Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation

JARO - Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 305-322

  Snyder, Russell L ^a,c   Bierer, Julie A ^a   Middlebrooks, John C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Auditory nervous system; Auditory prosthesis; Cochlear implant; Cochlear prosthesis; Deafness; Multichannel recording

Indexed keywords

ELASTOMER; SILICON;

ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; COCHLEA; COCHLEA PROSTHESIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRODE; ELECTROSTIMULATION; GUINEA PIG; HEARING IMPAIRMENT; INFERIOR COLLICULUS; MULTICHANNEL RECORDER; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TOPOGRAPHY; WAVEFORM;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ANIMALS; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; COCHLEA; COCHLEAR IMPLANTS; DEAFNESS; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTRODES, IMPLANTED; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; GUINEA PIGS; INFERIOR COLLICULUS;

EID: 4944241801     PISSN: 15253961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10162-004-4026-5     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. BIERER JA, MIDDLEBROOKS JC. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Dependence on electrode configuration. J. Neurophysiol. 87:478-492, 2002.
2. BLACK RC, CLARK GM. Differential electrical excitation of the auditory nerve. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 67:868-874, 1980.
3. BLACK RC, CLARK GM, PATRICK JF. Current distribution measurements with the human cochlea. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. BME-28:721-725, 1981.
4. BLACK RC, CLARK GM, TONG YC, PATRICK JF. Current distribution in cochlear stimulation. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 405:137-145, 1983.
5. BRIAIRE JJ, FRIJNS JHM. Field patterns in 3D tapered spiral model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear. Res. 148:18-30, 2000.
6. BUSBY PA, WHITFORD LA, BLAMEY PJ, RICHARDSON LM, CLARK GM. Pitch perception for different modes of stimulation using the cochlear multiple-electrode prosthesis. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 95:2658-2669, 1994.
7. CHATTERJEE M, SHANNON RV. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:2565-2572, 1998.
8. COLLINS LM, ZWOLAN TA, WAKEFIELD GH. Comparison of electrode discrimination, pitch ranking, and pitch scaling data in postlingually deaf adult cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 101:440-455, 1997.
9. DORMAN MF, SMITH L, MCCANDLESS G, DUNNAVANT G, PARKIN J, DANKOWSKI K. Pitch scaling and speech understanding by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear Hear. 11:310-315, 1990.
10. DRAKE KL, WISE KD, FARRAYE J, ANDERSON DJ, BEMENT SL. Performance of planar multisite microprobes in recording extracellular single-unit intracortical activity. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35:719-732, 1988.
11. EDDINGTON DK, DOBELLE WH, BRACKMAN DE, MLADEJOVSKY MG, PARKIN JL. Auditory prosthesis research with multiple channel intracochlear stimulation in Man. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 87(Suppl. 53):1-39, 1978.
12. FINLEY CC. A finite-element model of radial bipolar field patterns in the electrically stimulated cochlea-two and three dimensional approximations and tissue sensitivities. IEEE 11th Annu. Int. Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. pp 1059-1060, 1989.
13. FINLEY CC, WILSON BS, WHITE MW. A finite-element model of bipolar field patterns in the electrically stimulated cochlea-a two dimensional approximation. IEEE Ninth Annu. Conf. Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 1901-1903, 1987.
14. FINLEY CC, WILSON BS, WHITE MW. Models of neural responsiveness to electrical stimulation. In: MILLER JM, SPELMAN FA (eds) Cochlear Implants: Models of the Electrically Stimulated Ear Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 55-96, 1990.
15. FRIJNS JHM, MOOIJ J, KATE JHT. A quantitative approach to modeling mammalian myelinated nerve fibers for electrical prosthesis design. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 41:556-566, 1994.
16. FRIJNS JHM, SNOO SLD, SCHOONHOVEN R. Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear. Res. 87:170-186, 1995.
17. FRIJNS JHM, SNOO SLD, KATE JHT. Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear. Res. 95: 33-48, 1996.
18. FURUKAWA S, Xu L, MIDDLEBROOKS JC. Coding of sound-source location by ensembles of cortical neurons. J. Neurosci. 20:1216-1228, 2000.
19. FUZESSERY ZM. Response selectivity for multiple dimensions of frequency sweeps in the pallid bat inferior colliculus. J. Neurophysiol. 72:1061-1079, 1994.
20. GIRZON G. Investigation of current flow in the inner ear during electrical stimulation of intracochlear electrodes. M.S.E.E. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Cambridge, MA, 1984.
21. HANEKOM JJ, SHANNON RV. Gap detection as a measure of electrode interaction in cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 104:2372-2384, 1998.
22. IFUKUBE T, WHITE RL. Current distributions produced inside and outside the cochlea from a scala tympani electrode array. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 34:883-890, 1987.
23. JOLLY CN, SPELMAN FA, CLOPMAN BM. Quadrapolar stimulation of cochlear prostheses: modeling and experimental data. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 43:857-865, 1996.
24. KASPER A, PELIZZONI M, MONTANDON P. Intracochlear potential distribution with intracochlear and extracochlear electrical stimulation in humans. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 100:812-816, 1991.
25. KLINKE R, KRAL A, HEID S, TILLEIN J, HARTMANN R. Recruitment of the auditory cortex in congenitally deaf cats by long-term cochlear electrostimulation. Science 285:1729-1733, 1999.
26. KRAL A, HARTMANN R, MORTAZAVI D, KLINKE R. Spatial resolution of cochlear implants: The electrical field and excitation of auditory afferents. Hear. Res. 121:11-28, 1998.
27. LEAKE PA, HRADEK GT, REBSCHER SJ, SNYDER RL. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation induces selective survival of spiral ganglion neurons in neonatally deafened cats. Hear. Res. 54:251-271, 1991.
28. LEAKE PA, SNYDER RL, HRADEK GT, REBSCHER SJ. Consequences of chronic extracochlear electrical stimulation in neonatally deafened cats. Hear. Res. 82:65-80, 1995.
29. LEAKE PA, SNYDER RL, REBSCHER SJ, MOORE CM, VOLLMER M. Plasticity in central representations in the inferior colliculus induced by chronic single- vs. two-channel electrical stimulation by a cochlear implant after neonatal deafness. Hear. Res. 147:221-241, 2000.
30. LIM HH, TONG YC, CLARK GM. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:971-980, 1989.
31. MCDERMOTT HJ, MCKAY CM. Pitch ranking with non-simultaneous dual-electrode electrical stimulation of the cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 96:155-162, 1994.
32. MCKAY CM, O'BRIEN A, JAMES CJ. Effects of current level on electrode discrimination in electrical stimulation. Hear. Res. 136:159-164, 1999.
33. MIDDLEBROOKS JC, BIERER JA. Auditory cortical images of cochlear-implant stimuli: Coding of stimulus channel and current level. J. Neurophysiol. 87:493-507, 2002.
34. NAJAFI K, WISE KD, MOCHIZUKI T. A high-yield IC-compatible multichannel recording array. IEEE Trans. Electron. Dev. 32:1206-1211, 1985.
35. NELSON DA, Van TASELL DJ, SCHRODER AC, SOLI S, LEVINE S. Electrode ranking of 'place pitch' and speech recognition in electrical hearing. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:1987-1999, 1995.
36. O'LEARY SJ, BLACK RC, CLARK GM. Current distributions in the cat cochlea: A modeling and electrophysiological study. Hear. Res. 18:273-281, 1985.
37. PAUKA CK. Place-pitch and vowel-pitch comparisons in cochlear implant patients using the Melbourne-Nucleus cochlear implant. J. Laryngol. Otol. Suppl. 19:1-31, 1989.
38. PFINGST BE, HOLLOWAY LA, ZWOLAN TA, COLLINS LM. Effects of stimulus level on electrode-place discrimination in human subjects with cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 134:105-115, 1999.
39. RAGGIO MW, SCHREINER CE. Neuronal responses in cat primary auditory cortex to electrical cochlear stimulation. III. Activation patterns in short- and long-term deafness. J. Neurophysiol. 82:3506-3526, 1999.
40. RATTAY R. Analysis of models for extracellular fiber stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 36:676-692, 1989.
41. RATTAY R, RICHARDSON NL, FELIX H. A model of the electrically excited cochlear neuron. I. Contribution of neural substructures to the generation and propagation of spikes. Hear. Res. 153:43-63, 2001a.
42. RATTAY R, RICHARDSON NL, FELIX H. A model of the electrically excited cochlear neuron. II. Influence of the three-dimensional cochlear structure on neural excitability. Hear. Res. 153:64-79, 2001b.
43. REBSCHER SJ, SNYDER RL, LEAKE PA. The effect of electrode orientation on threshold and selectivity of responses to intracochlear electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 109:2035-2048, 2001.
44. SCHREINER CE, LANGNER G. Periodicity coding in the inferior colliculus of the cat. II. Topographical organization. J. Neurophysiol. 60:1823-1840, 1988.
45. SHANNON RV. Multi-channel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:157-189, 1983.
46. SHEPHERD RK, BAXI JH, HARDIE NA. Response of inferior colliculus neurons to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in neonatally deafened cats. J. Neurophysiol. 82:1363-1380, 1999.
47. SNYDER RL, SINEX DG. Immediate changes in tuning of cat inferior colliculus (IC) neurons following acute spiral ganglion lesions. J. Neurophysiol. 87:434-452, 2002.
48. SNYDER RL, REBSCHER SJ, CAO K, LEAKE PA, KELLY K. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. I. Expansion of central representation. Hear. Res. 50:7-33, 1990.
49. SNYDER RL, REBSCHER SJ, LEAKE PA, KELLY K, CAO K. Chronic intracochlear electrical stimulation in the neonatally deafened cat. II. Temporal properties of neurons in the inferior colliculus. Hear. Res. 56:246-264, 1991.
50. SNYDER RL, SINEX DG, WALSH E, MCGEE J. Acute spiral ganglion lesions change the tuning and topographic organization of inferior colliculus neurons. Hear. Res. 147:200-220, 2000.
51. STRELIOFF D. A computer simulation of the generation and distribution of cochlear potentials. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54:620-629, 1973.
52. SUESSERMAN M, SPELMAN FA. Lumped-parameter model for in vivo cochlear stimulation. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 40:237-245, 1992.
53. TANIGUCHI I, HORIKAWA J, HOSOKAWA Y, NASU M. Optical imaging of neural activity in auditory cortex induced by intracochlear electrical stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol. Suppl. 532:83-88, 1997.
54. TONG YC, CLARK GM. Absolute identification of electric pulse rates and electrode positions by cochlear implant patients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 77:1881-1888, 1985.
55. TONG YC, CLARK GM, BLAMEY PJ, BUSBY PA, DOWELL RC. Psychophysical studies for two multichannel cochlear implant patients. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71:153-180, 1982.
56. TOWNSHEND B, COTTER N, COMPERNOLLE N, WHITE RL. Pitch perception by cochlear implant subjects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 82:106-115, 1987.
57. VAN DEN HONERT C, STYPULKOWSKI PH. "Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulates auditory nearve" Hear. Res. 29:195-206, 1987.
58. WARDROP P, REBSCHER SJ, ROLAND JT, LEAKE PA (2003) A temporal bone study of insertion trauma, intracochlear position of cochlear implant electrodes. I: comparison of Cochlear banded and Cochlear Contour electrodes, 2003.
59. WARMAN EN, GRILL WM, DURANT D. Modeling the effects of electrical fields on nerve fibers: Determination of excitation thresholds. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 39:1244-1254, 1992.
60. WOOLSEY CN, WALZL EM. Topical projections of the nerve fibers from local regions of the cochlea to the cerebral cortex of the cat. Bull. Johns Hopkins Hosp. 71:315-344, 1943.