Patterns of genetic variation between the checkered skippers Pyrgus communis and Pyrgus albescens (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae)

Annals of the Entomological Society of America

Volumn 101, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 794-800

  Fordyce, James A ^a   Forister, Matthew L ^b   Nice, Chris C ^c   Burns, John M ^d   Shapiro, Arthur M ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^c Texas State University   (United States)

^d DEPARTMENT OF PALEOBIOLOGY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Genitalia; Introgression; Phylogeography; Sibling species; Sierra Nevada

Indexed keywords

BUTTERFLY; GENETIC VARIATION; INTROGRESSION; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; TAXONOMY;

CALIFORNIA; NORTH AMERICA; SIERRA NEVADA [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

HESPERIIDAE; LEPIDOPTERA; PYRGUS; PYRGUS COMMUNIS;

EID: 49149121004     PISSN: 00138746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/0013-8746(2008)101[794:POGVBT]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Austin, G. T. 1986. Pyrgus communis and P. albescens (Hesperiidae) in Nevada. J. Lepid. Soc. 40: 55-58.
2. Austin, G. T., and D. D. Murphy. 1987. Zoogeography of great basin butterflies-patterns of distribution and differentiation. Great Basin Nat. 47: 186-201.
3. Brower, A.V.Z., and R. DeSalle. 1998. Patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA sequence divergence among nymphalid butterflies: the utility of wingless as a source of characters for phylogenetic inference. Insect Mol. Biol. 7: 73-82.
4. Burns, J. M. 2000. Pyrgus communis and Pyrgus albescens (Hesperiidae: Pyrginae) are separate transcontinental species with variable but diagnostic valves. J. Lepid. Soc. 54: 52-71.
5. Calhoun, J. V. 2002. Sibling rivalry in Florida: the displacement of Pyrgus communis by Pyrgus albescens (Hesperiidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 56: 98-103.
6. Calsbeek, R., J. N. Thompson, and J. E. Richardson. 2003. Patterns of molecular evolution and diversification in a biodiversity hotspot: the California Floristic Province. Mol. Ecol. 12: 1021-1029.
7. Caterino, M. S., R. D. Reed, M. M. Kuo, and F.A.H. Sperling. 2001. A partitioned likelihood analysis of swallowtail butterfly phylogeny (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae). Syst. Biol. 50: 106-127.
8. Caterino, M. S., and F.A.H. Sperling. 1999. Papilio phylogeny based on mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I and II genes. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 11: 122-137.
9. Chatzimanolis, S., and M.S. Caterino. 2007. Toward a better understanding of the "Transverse Range Break": lineage diversification in southern California. Evolution 61:2127-2141.
10. Clement, M., D. Posada, and K. A. Crandall. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9: 1657-1659.
11. Degnan, J. H., and N. A. Rosenberg. 2006. Discordance of species trees with their most likely gene trees. PLoS Genet. 2: 762-768.
12. Dupanloup, I., S. Schneider, and L. Excoffier. 2002. A simulated annealing approach to define the genetic structure of populations. Mol. Ecol. 11: 2571-2581.
13. Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse, and J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131: 479-491.
14. Forister, M. L., J. A. Fordyce, and A. M. Shapiro. 2004. Geological barriers and restricted gene flow in the holarctic skipper Hesperia comma (Hesperiidae). Mol. Ecol. 13: 3489-3499.
15. Forister, M. L., C. C. Nice, J. A. Fordyce, Z. Gompert, and A. M. Shapiro. 2008. Considering evolutionary processes in the use of single-locus genetic data for conservation, with examples from the Lepidoptera. J. Insect Conserv. 12: 37-51.
16. Gompert, Z., J. A. Fordyce, M. L. Forister, A. M. Shapiro, and C. C. Nice. 2006a. Homoploid hybrid speciation in an extreme habitat. Science (Wash., D.C.) 314:1923-1925.
17. Gompert, Z., C. C. Nice, J. A. Fordyce, M. L. Forister, and A. M. Shapiro. 2006b. Identifying units for conservation using molecular systematics: the cautionary tale of the Karner blue butterfly. Mol. Ecol. 15: 1759-1768.
18. Hein, J., M. H. Schierup, C. Wiuf. 2005. Gene genealogies, variation and evolution: a primer in coalescent theory. Oxford University Press, New York.
19. Hillis, D. M., B. K. Mable, A. Larson, S. K. Davis, and E. A. Zimmer. 1996. Nucleic acids. IV. Sequencing and cloning, pp. 321-384. In D. M. Hillis, C. Moritz, and B. K. Mable [eds.], Molecular systematics. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
20. Knowles, L. L., and B. C. Carstens. 2007. Delimiting species without monophyletic gene trees. Syst. Biol. 56: 887-895.
21. Kubatko, L. S., and J. H. Degnan. 2007. Inconsistency of phylogenetic estimates from concatenated data under coalescence. Syst. Biol. 56: 17-24.
22. Layberry, R. A., P. W. Hall, and J. D. Lafontaine, 1998. The butterflies of Canada. University of Toronto Press, in association with NRC Research Press, Toronto, ON, Canada.
23. Nice, C. C., N. Anthony, G. Gelembiuk, D. Raterman, and R. ffrench-Constant. 2005. The history and geography of diversification within the butterfly genus Lycaeides in North America. Mol. Ecol. 14: 1741-1754.
24. Nice, C. C., and A. M. Shapiro. 2001. Population genetic evidence of restricted gene flow between host races in the butterfly genus Mitoura (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94: 257-267.
25. Oliver, J. C., and A. M. Shapiro. 2007. Genetic isolation and cryptic variation within the Lycaena xanthoides species group (Lepidoptera: Lycaenidae). Mol. Ecol. 16: 4308-4320.
26. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817-818.
27. Powell, J. A. 1958. Additions to the knowledge of the butterfly fauna of Baja California Norte. Lepid. News 12: 26-32.
28. Rosenberg, N. A., and M. Nordborg. 2002. Genealogical trees, coalescent theory and the analysis of genetic polymorphisms. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 380-390.
29. Schneider, S. D., D. Roessli, and L. Excoffier. 2000. Arlequin. Vers. 2.0 A software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
30. Shapiro, A. M. 1992. Genetics and the evolution and biogeography of some Klamath butterflies in a regional context, pp. 237-248. In R. R. Harris, D. C. Erman, and H. M. Kerner [eds.], Proceedings, Symposium on biodiversity of northwestern California, Oct. 28-30, 1991, Santa Rosa, CA. Wildland Resources Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA.
31. Slowinski, J. B., and R. D. Page. 1999. How should species phylogenies be inferred from sequence data? Syst. Biol. 48: 814-825.
32. Swenson, N. G., and D. J. Howard. 2005. Clustering of contact zones, hybrid zones, and phylogeograpbic breaks in North America. Am. Nat. 166: 581-591.
33. Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b.10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
34. Tilden, J. W. 1965. A note on Pyrgus communis and Pyrgus albescens (Hesperiidae). J. Lepid. Soc. 19: 91-94.