Peer Assessment for Action Learning of Data Structures and Algorithms

Conferences in Research and Practice in Information Technology Series

Volumn 42, Issue , 2005, Pages 73-82

  Machanick, Philip ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACTION LEARNING; COMPUTER SCIENCE EDUCATION; DEEP LEARNING; EFFICIENT LEARNING; FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT; KEY PARTS; PEER ASSESSMENT;

CURRICULA; DATA STRUCTURES; LEARNING ALGORITHMS; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; SURVEYS;

TEACHING;

EID: 49149107947     PISSN: 14451336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Adams, W. A. (1980): The Experience of Teaching and Learning: A Phenomenology of Education, Psychological Press, Seattle.
2. Berger, P. L. (1966): The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge, Doubleday, New York.
3. Biggs, J. (1999): 'What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning', Higher Education Research $ Development 18(1): 57-75.
4. Boehm, B. W. (1988): 'A spiral model of software development and enhancement', Computer 21(5): 61-72.
5. Bradley, C. & Oliver, M. (2002): 'The evolution of pedagogic models for work-based learning within a virtual university', Computers & Education 38(1-3): 37-52.
6. Brookes, W. & Indulska, J. (1996): Teaching internet literacy to a large and diverse audience, in 'Proc. second Australasian Conf. on Computer Science Education', The Univ. of Melbourne, Australia, pp. 7-15.
7. Brookshear, J. G. (1985): The university computer science curriculum: education versus training, in 'Proc. sixteenth SIGCSE Tech. Symp. on Computer Science Education', New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, pp. 23-30.
8. Brown, S. (1999): Institutional strategies for assessment, in S. Brown & A. Glasner, eds, 'Assessment Matters in Higher Education', Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, pp. 3-13.
9. Bunning, C. (2001): Turning experience into learning, in L. Steffe & J. Gale, eds, 'Action learning at work', Gower, Aldershot, Hampshire.
10. Clanchy, M. (1993): From memory to written record, England 1066-1307, 2nd edn, Blackwell, Oxford.
11. Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1985): Research Methods in Education, 2nd edn, Croom Helm, London.
12. Denning, P. J. (1999): Computing the profession, in 'The Proc. thirtieth SIGCSE Tech. Symp. on Computer Science Education', New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, pp. 1-2.
13. Director, S., Khosla, P., Rohrer, R. & Rutenbar, R. (1995): 'Reengineering the curriculum: design and analysis of a new undergraduate electrical and computer engineering degree at Carnegie Mellon University', Proc. of the IEEE 83(9): 1246-1269.
14. Gehringer, E. F. (2001): Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses, 'Proc. thirty second SIGCSE Tech. Symp. on Computer Science Education', Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, pp. 139-143.
15. Gibbs, G. (1999): Using assessment strategically to change the way students learn, in S. Brown & A. Glasner, eds, 'Assessment Matters in Higher Education', Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press, Buckingham, UK, pp. 41-53.
16. Ḧubscher-Younger, T. & Narayanan, N. (2003): Constructive and collaborative learning of algorithms, in 'Proc. SIGCSE Tech. Symp. on Computer Science Education', pp. 6-10.
17. Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991): Legitimate peripheral participation in communities of practice 'Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation', Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 89-117.
18. Moore, J. W. (1998): 'Education versus training', J. Chemical Education 75: 135.
19. Naps, T. L., Rling, G., Almstrum, V., Dann, W., Fleischer, R., Hundhausen, C., Korhonen, A., Malmi, L., McNally, M., Rodger, S. & ngel Velzquez-Iturbide, J. (2003): 'Exploring the role of visualization and engagement in computer science education', ACM SIGCSE Bulletin 35(2): 131-152.
20. Papert, S. (1993): Mindstorms, 2nd edn, Basic Books, New York.
21. Preiss, B. R. (2000): Data Structures and Algorithms with Object-Oriented Design Patterns in Java, Wiley, New York.
22. Ramsden, P. (1988): Studying learning: Improving teaching, in P. Ramsden, ed., 'Improving Learning: New Perspectives', Kogan Page, London, pp. 13-31.
23. Ruehr, F. & Orr, G. (2002): 'Interactive program demonstration as a form of student program assessment', The J. Computing in Small Colleges 18(2): 65-78.
24. Sanders, I. (2002): Teaching empirical analysis of algorithms, in 'Proc. 33rd SIGCSE Tech. Symp. on Computer Science Education', Cincinnati, Kentucky, pp. 321-325.
25. Sanders, I. & Mueller, C. (2000): A fundamentals-based curriculum for first year computer science, in 'Proc. 31st SIGCSE Tech. Symp. on Computer Science Education', Austin, TX, pp. 227-231.
26. Scḧon, D. (1995): 'The new scholarship requires a new epistemology', Change 27(6): 27-34 (2003): 'Economic indicators May 2003'. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgidbname=economicindic%atorsdocid=00my03.txt.pdf.
27. Vat, K. H. (2000): Training e-commerce support personnel for enterprises through action learning, 'Proc. 2000 ACM SIGCPR Conf. on Computer personnel research', Chicago, Illinois, United States, pp. 39-44.
28. von Glasersfeld, E. (1995): Constructivist approach to teaching, in L. Steffe & J. Gale, eds, 'Constructivism in Education', Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 3-15.
29. Wilson, B. C. & Shrock, S. (2001): Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: a study of twelve factors, 'Proc. 32nd SIGCSE Tech. Symp. on Computer Science Education', Charlotte, North Carolina, United States, pp. 184-188.
30. Wilson, J., Aiken, R. & Katz, I. (1996): Review of animation systems for algorithm understanding, 'Proc. 1st Conf. on Integrating technology into Computer Science Education', Barcelona, Spain, pp. 75-77.