An Integrated Approach to Instructional Technology

Action in Teacher Education

Volumn 22, Issue sup2, 2000, Pages 1-13

  Di, Xu ^a   Dunn, Denise ^a   Lee, S J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WEST FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 49149106256     PISSN: 01626620     EISSN: 21586098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01626620.2000.10463034     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Beaver, J., 1990. A profile of undergraduate educational technology in (competence): Are we preparing today's education graduates for teaching in the 1990's ?, Buffalo, NY: SUNY at Buffalo. Research report, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 332 985)
2. Bliss, T., and Mazur, J., 1996. Common thread case project: Developing associations of experienced and novice educators through technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 47 (3): 185–190
3. Brooks, D., 1989. Technology in education. Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (4): 2–8
4. Brooks, D., and Kopp, T., 1989. Technology in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 9 (1): 20–24
5. Cole, G., 1996. Civil answers. (Information technology in British schools). Times Educational Supplement, April, 5 (4162): B18
6. Daniel, P., 1996. Helping beginning teachers link theory to practice: An interactive multimedia environment for mathematics and science teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 47 (3): 197–204
7. Dewey, J., 1964. “ My pedagogic creed ”. In John Dewey on Education, Edited by: Archambault, R. D., Chicago: University of Chicago Press
8. Duckworth, E., 1989. The having of wonderful ideas, NY: Teachers College Press
9. Goldberg, M., 1997. Arts and learning: An integrated approach to teaching and learning in multicultural and multilingual settings, NY: Longman Publishing Co
10. Harrington, H., 1993. The essence of technology and the education of teachers. Journal of Teacher Education, 44 (1): 5–15
11. Hatfield, M., 1996. Using multimedia in preservice education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47 (3): 223–228
12. Hill, R., and Somers, J., 1996. A process for initiating change: Developing technology goals for a college of education. Journal of Teacher Education, 47 (4): 300–306
13. International Society for Technology and Education. 1993. Curriculum guidelines for accreditation of educational computing and technology programs, Eugene, OR: International Society for Technology in Education
14. National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education. 1992. NCATE approved curriculum guidelines, Washington, DC: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education
15. Nicklin, J., 1992. Teachers' use of computers stressed by education colleges. Chronicle of Higher Education, 38 (43): A15–17
16. Niederhauser, D., 1996. Using computers in an information age classroom: What teachers need to know. NASSP Bulletin, 80 (582): 71–80
17. Northrup, P. T., and Little, W., 1996. Establishing instructional technology benchmarks for teacher preparation programs. Journal of Teacher Education, 47 (3): 213–222
18. Roblyer, M. D., 1994. Creating technology using teachers: A model for preservice technology training Report of a Florida DOE-funded project, Tallahassee, FL
19. Schmeltzer, T., 1995. Adding another piece to the staff development puzzle: Some products and services you should know about. Technology and Learning, 16 (1): 44–49
20. Seminoff, N. E., and Wepner, S. B., Does the use of technology for scholarship and teaching really interface with tenure and promotion?. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association of Colleges for Teacher Education. Chicago. February
21. Shaw, R. E., 1995. Military experience as preparation for teaching a technology rich high school navy science curriculum, Pensacola: University of West Florida. Unpublished specialist thesis
22. Shelton, M., 1996. Staff development that works! A tale of four t's. NASSP Bulletin, 80 (582): 99–105
23. Southeastern Regional Vision for Education (SERVE). 1993. Using technology to improve teaching and learning, Tallahassee: Florida Department of Education. Report of an Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Educational funded project (Contract # RP 91002010)
24. U.S. Congress. 1988. “ Office of Technology Assessment ”. In Power on! New tools for teaching and learning, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
25. U.S. Congress. 1995. Teachers and technology: Making the connection, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office
26. Wilson, D., 1993. Producing computer literate teachers. Chronicle of Higher Education, 40 (15): A21–22