Recording focal macular photopic negative response (PhNR) from monkeys

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 49, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 3544-3550

  Kondo, Mineo ^a   Kurimoto, Yukihide ^a   Sakai, Takao ^a   Koyasu, Toshiyuki ^a   Miyata, Kentaro ^a   Ueno, Shinji ^a   Terasaki, Hiroko ^a  

^a NAGOYA UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TETRODOTOXIN; SODIUM CHANNEL BLOCKING AGENT;

AMPLITUDE MODULATION; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; B WAVE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; INFRARED PHOTOGRAPHY; LASER COAGULATION; MACULA PHOTOPIC NEGATIVE RESPONSE; NONHUMAN; PHOTOLUMINESCENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETINA MACULA LUTEA; RHESUS MONKEY; STIMULUS; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECT; EYE FUNDUS; INJECTION; MACACA; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RETINA; VITREOUS BODY;

ANIMALS; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; FUNDUS OCULI; INJECTIONS; LASER COAGULATION; MACACA MULATTA; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PHOTOGRAPHY; RETINA; SODIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS; TETRODOTOXIN; VITREOUS BODY;

EID: 49049121078     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.08-1798     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, et al. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1124-1136.
2. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. The uniform field and pattern ERG in macaques with experimental glaucoma: removal of spiking activity. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2797-2810.
3. Rangaswamy NV, Shirato S, Kaneko M, et al. Effects of spectral characteristics of Ganzfeld stimuli on the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:4818-4828.
4. Narahashi T, Moore JW, Scott WR. Tetrodotoxin blockage of sodium conductance increase in lobster giant axons. J Gen Physiol. 1964;47:965-974.
5. Bloomfield SA. Effect of spike blockade on the receptive-field size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:1878-1893.
6. Stafford DK, Dacey DM. Physiology of the A1 amacrine: a spiking, axon-bearing interneuron of the macaque monkey retina. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14:507-522.
7. Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, et al. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: Losses associated with glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;41:2205-2211.
8. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, et al. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:514-522.
9. Drasdo N, Aldebasi YH, Chiti Z, et al. The S-cone PhNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1266-1272.
10. Gotoh Y, Machida S, Tazawa Y. Selective loss of the photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:341-346.
11. Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo EU, et al. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacologic blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3827-3837.
12. Miyata K, Nakamura M, Kondo M, et al. Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:820-824.
13. Machida S, Gotoh Y, Tanaka M, Tazawa Y. Predominant loss of the photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:938-940.
14. Kizawa J, Machida S, Kobayashi T, et al. Changes of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with early diabetic retinopathy. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2006;50:367-373.
15. Chen H, Wu D, Huang S, Yan H. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion. Doc Ophthalmol. 2006;113:53-59.
16. Ueno S, Kondo M, Piao CH, et al. Selective amplitude reduction of the PhNR after macular hole surgery: ganglion cell damage related to ICG-assisted ILM peeling and gas tamponade. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3545-3549.
17. Rangaswamy NV, Hood DC, Frishman LJ. Regional variations in local contributions to the primate photopic flash ERG: revealed using the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3233-3247.
18. Fortune B, Wang L, Bui BV, et al. Local ganglion cell contributions to the macaque electroretinogram revealed by experimental nerve fiber layer bundle defect. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:4567-4579.
19. Ueno S, Kondo M, Niwa Y, et al. Luminance dependence of neural components that underlies the primate photopic electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1033-1040.
20. Ueno S, Kondo M, Ueno M, et al. Contribution of retinal neurons to d-wave of primate photopic electroretinograms. Vision Res. 2006;46:658-664.
21. Brindley GS, Westheimer G. The spatial properties of the human electroretinogram. J Physiol. 1965;179:518-537.
22. Aiba TS, Alpern M, Maaseidvaag F. The electroretinogram evoked by the excitation of human foveal cones. J Physiol. 1967;189:43-62.
23. Jacobson JH, Kawasaki K, Hirose T. The human electroretinogram and occipital potential in response to focal illumination of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol. 1969;8:545-556.
24. Biersdorf WR, Diller DA. Local electroretinogram in macular degeneration. Am J Ophthalmol. 1969;68:296-303.
25. Hirose T, Miyake Y, Hara A. Simultaneous recording of electroretinogram and visual evoked response: focal stimulation under direct observation. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:1205-1208.
26. Sandberg MA, Ariel M. A hand-held, two-channel stimulator-ophthalmoscope. Arch Ophthalmol. 1977;95:1881-1882.
27. Seiple WH, Siegel IM, Carr RE, Mayron C. Evaluating macular function using the focal ERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:1123-1130.
28. Miyake Y, Shiroyama N, Horiguchi M, Ota I. Asymmetry of focal ERG in human macular region. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:1743-1749.
29. Rolls ET, Cowey A. Topography of the retina and striate cortex and its relationship to visual acuity in rhesus monkeys and squirrel monkeys. Exp Brain Res. 1970;10:298-310.
30. Webb SV, Kaas JH. The sizes and distribution of ganglion cells in the retina of the owl monkey Aotus trivirgatus. Vision Res. 1976;16:1247-1254.
31. DeBruyn EJ, Wise VL, Casagrande VA. The size and topographic arrangement of retinal ganglion cells in the galago. Vision Res. 1980;20:315-327.
32. Stone J, Johnston E. The topography of primate retina: a study of the human, bushbaby, and new-and old-world monkeys. J Comp Neurol. 1981;196:205-224.
33. Perry VH, Cowey A. The ganglion cell and cone distributions in the monkey's retina: implications for central magnification factors. Vision Res. 1985;25:1795-1810.
34. Curcio CA, Allen KA. Topography of ganglion cells in human retina. J Comp Neurol. 1990;300:5-25.
35. Sutter EE, Bearse MA Jr. The optic nerve head component of the human ERG. Vision Res. 1999;39:419-436.
36. Hood DC, Bearse MA Jr, Sutter EE, et al. The optic nerve head component of the monkey's (Macaca mulatta) multifocal electroretinogram (mERG). Vision Res. 2001;41:2029-2041.