Effects of spectral characteristics of ganzfeld stimuli on the photopic negative response (PhNR) of the ERG

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 48, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 4818-4828

  Rangaswamy, Nalini V ^a   Shirato, Suguru ^a,b   Kaneko, Muneyoshi ^a,c   Digby, Beth I ^a   Robson, John G ^a   Frishman, Laura J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c IWATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

2,3 PIPERIDINEDICARBOXYLIC ACID; TETRODOTOXIN; 2,3-PIPERIDINEDICARBOXYLIC ACID; GLUTAMATE RECEPTOR; PIPECOLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; COLOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; GLAUCOMA; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LASER; MONKEY; NEUROTRANSMISSION; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOPIC VISION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL STIMULATION; ANIMAL; DRUG EFFECT; MACACA; METABOLISM; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RETINA; RETINA CONE;

ADULT; ANIMALS; CONES (RETINA); ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; GLAUCOMA; HUMANS; MACACA MULATTA; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PIPECOLIC ACIDS; RECEPTORS, GLUTAMATE; RETINA; TETRODOTOXIN;

EID: 35748971500     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.07-0218     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Harwerth RS, Smith EL III. The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram is reduced by experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40:1124-1136.
2. Frishman LJ, Shen FF, Du L, et al. The scotopic electroretinogram of macaque after retinal ganglion cell loss from experimental glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1996;37:125-141.
3. Hare WA, Ton H, Ruiz G, Feldmann B, Wijono M, WoldeMussie E. Characterization of retinal injury using ERG measures obtained with both conventional and multifocal methods in chronic ocular hypertensive primates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:127-136.
4. Bloomfield SA. Effect of spike blockade on the receptive field size of amacrine and ganglion cells in the rabbit retina. J Neurophysiol. 1996;75:1878-1893.
5. Stafford DK, Dacey DM. Physiology of the A1 amacrine: a spiking axon-bearing interneuron of the macaque monkey retina. Vis Neurosci. 1997;14:507-522.
6. Colotto A, Falsini B, Salgarello T, Iorossi G, Galan ME, Scullica L. Photopic negative response of the human ERG: losses associated with glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2000;42:2205-2211.
7. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG, Walters, JW. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:514-522.
8. Drasdo N, Aldebasi YH, Chiti Z, Mortlock KE, Morgan JE, North RV. The s-cone PhNR and pattern ERG in primary open angle glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1266-1272.
9. Gotoh Y, Machida S, Tazawa Y. Selective loss of photopic negative response in patients with optic nerve atrophy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004;122:341-346.
10. Rangaswamy NV, Frishman LJ, Dorotheo U, Tang RA. Photopic ERGs in patients with optic neuropathies: comparison with primate ERGs after pharmacological blockade of inner retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:3827-3837.
11. Miyata K, Nakamura M, Kondo M, et al. Reduction of oscillatory potentials and photopic negative response in patients with autosomal dominant optic atrophy with OPA1 mutations. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:820-824.
12. Machida S, Gotoh Y, Tanaka M, Tazawa Y. Predominant loss of photopic negative response in central retinal artery occlusion. Am J Ophthalmol. 2004;137:938-940.
13. Ueno S, Kondo M, Piao CH, Ikenoya K, Miyake Y, Terasaki H. Selective amplitude reduction of the PhNR after macular hole surgery: ganglion cell damage related to ICG-assisted ILM peeling and gas tamponade. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3545-3549.
14. Chen H, Wu D, Huang S, Yan H. The photopic negative response of the flash electroretinogram in retinal vein occlusion. Doc Ophthalmol. 2006;113:53-59.
15. Sieving PA, Murayama K, Naarendorp F. Push-pull model of the primate photopic electroretinogram: a role for hyperpolarizing neurons in shaping the b-wave. Vis Neurosci. 1994;11:519-532.
16. Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA. Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979;18:988-991.
17. Slaughter MM, Miller RF. An excitatory amino acid antagonist blocks cone input to sign-conserving second-order retinal neurons. Science. 1983;219:1230-1232.
18. Slaughter MM, Miller RF. Bipolar cells in mudpuppy retina use an excitatory amino acid neurotransmitter. Nature. 1983;303:537-538.
19. Stockton RA, Slaughter MM. B-wave of the electroretinogram: a reflection of on bipolar cell activity. J Gen Physiol. 1989;93:101-122.
20. Viswanathan S, Frishman LJ, Robson JG. Inner retinal contributions to the photopic flicker electroretinogram of macaques. Doc Ophthalmol. 2002;105:223-242.
21. Rangaswamy NV, Hood DC, Frishman LJ. Regional variations in local contributions to the primate photopic flash ERG: revealed using the slow-sequence mfERG. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:3233-3247.
22. Smith EL III, Chino YM, Harwerth RS, Ridder WH, Crawford ML, DeSantis L. Retinal inputs to the monkey's lateral geniculate nucleus in experimental glaucoma. Clin Vis Sci. 1993;8:113-139.
23. Harwerth RS, Smith EL III, DeSantis L. Behavioral perimetry in monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1993;34:31-40.
24. Harwerth RS, Vilupuru AS, Rangaswamy NV, Smith EL III. The relationship between nerve fiber layer and perimetry measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:763-773.
25. Stockman A, MacLeod DI, Johnson NE. Spectral sensitivities of human cones. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 1993;10:2491-2521.
26. Dobkins K, Thiele A, Albright TD. Comparison of red-green equiluminance points in humans and macaques: evidence for different L:M cone ratios between species. J Opt Soc Am A. 2000;17:545-556.
27. Bush RA, Sieving PA. A proximal retinal component in the primate photopic ERG a-wave. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35:635-645.
28. Robson JG, Frishman LJ. Dissecting the dark-adapted electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol. 1999;1998-95:187-215.
29. Hood DC, Greenstein V, Frishman LJ, et al. Identifying inner retinal contributions to the human multifocal ERG. Vision Res. 1999;39:2285-2291.
30. Evers HU, Gouras P. Three cone mechanisms in the primate electroretinogram: two with, one without off- center bipolar responses. Vis Res. 1986;26:245-254.
31. Kasuga T. Effect of glutamate analogues on red-green opponent interaction in monkey electroretinograms. Exp Eye Res. 2001;73:311-320.
32. Jacobs GH, Deegan JF 2nd. Spectral sensitivity of macaque monkeys measured with ERG flicker photometry. Vis Neurosci. 1997;114:921-928.
33. Marc RE, Sperling HG. Chromatic organization of primate cones. Science. 1977;196:454-456.
34. Bowmaker JK, Mollon JD, Jacobs GH. Microspectrophotometric results for old and new world primates. In: Mollon JD, Sharpe LT, eds. Colour Vision. London: Academic Press; 1983:57-68.
35. Harosi FI. Cynomolgus and rhesus monkey visual pigments: application of Fourier transform smoothing and statistical techniques to the determination of spectral parameters. J Gen Physiol. 1987;89:717-743.
36. Mollon JD, Bowmaker JK. The spatial arrangement of cones in the primate fovea. Nature. 1992;360:677-679.
37. Roorda A, Williams DR. The arrangement of the three cone classes in the living human eye. Nature. 1999;397:520-522.
38. Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M. Estimates of L:M cone ratio from ERG flicker photometry and genetics. J Vision. 2002;2:531-542.
39. Hofer H, Carroll J, Neitz J, Neitz M, Williams DR. Organization of the human trichromatic cone mosaic. J Neurosci. 2005;25:9669-9679.
40. Kremers J, Scholl HP, Knau H, Berendschot TT, Usui T, Sharpe LT. L/M cone ratios in human trichromats assessed by psychophysics, electroretinography and retinal densitometry. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis. 2000;17:517-526.