Saccharomyces sensu stricto as a model system for evolution and ecology

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 494-501

  Replansky, Taissa ^a   Koufopanou, Vassiliki ^b   Greig, Duncan ^c   Bell, Graham ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EVOLUTION; GENOMICS; POPULATION GENETICS; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); YEAST;

CLASSIFICATION; CYTOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENETICS; GENOME; PHYSIOLOGY; REVIEW; SACCHAROMYCES;

ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; GENOME; SACCHAROMYCES;

SACCHAROMYCES; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 49049120999     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2008.05.005     Document Type: Review

References (92)

1. Jessup C.M., et al. Big questions, small worlds: microbial model systems in ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 19 (2004) 189-197
2. Ziemer C.J., et al. Comparison of microbial populations in model and natural rumens using 16S ribosomal RNA-targeted probes. Environ. Microbiol. 2 (2000) 632-643
3. 2 springs. Funct. Plant Biol. 31 (2004) 181-194
4. 2. Ecol. Lett. 9 (2006) 129-135
5. Goffeau A., et al. Life with 600 genes. Science 247 (1996) 546-567
6. Zeyl C. Budding yeast as a model organism for population genetics. Yeast 16 (2000) 773-784
7. Landry C.R., et al. Ecological and evolutionary genomics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Ecol. 15 (2006) 575-591
8. Martini A. Origin and domestication of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Wine Res. 4 (1993) 165-176
9. Vaughan-Martini A., and Martini A. Facts, myths and legends of the prime industrial microorganism. J. Ind. Microbiol. 14 (1995) 514-522
10. Naumov G., et al. Genetic identification of natural Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeasts from Finland, Holland, and Slovakia. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 61 (1992) 237-243
11. Johnson L.J., et al. Population genetics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Genetics 166 (2004) 43-52
12. Fay J., and Benadives J.A. Evidence for domesticated and wild populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 1 (2005) e5
13. Aa E., et al. Population structure and gene evolution in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 6 (2006) 702-715
14. Barnett J.A., et al. Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification (2000), Cambridge University Press
15. Sweeney J.Y., et al. Sympatric natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae and S. paradoxus populations have different thermal growth profiles. FEMS Yeast Res. 4 (2004) 521-525
16. Naumov G.I., et al. Saccharomyces paradoxus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae are associated with exudates of North American oaks. Can. J. Microbiol. 44 (1998) 1045-1050
17. Sniegowski P.D., et al. Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces paradoxus coexist in a natural woodland site in North America and display different levels of reproductive isolation from European conspecifics. FEMS Yeast Res. 1 (2002) 299-306
18. van der Walt J.P. The genus Saccharomyces emend. Reess. In: Lodder J. (Ed). The Yeasts: A Taxomic Study. 2nd edn (1970), North-Holland 575-618
19. Naumov G.I., et al. Three new species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex: Saccharomyces cariocanus, Saccharomyces kydriavzevii, and Saccharomyces mikatae. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50 (2000) 1931-1942
20. Kellis M., et al. Sequencing and comparison of yeast species to identify genes and regulatory elements. Nature 423 (2003) 241-254
21. Goddard M.R., and Burt A. Recurrent invasion and extinction of a selfish gene. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96 (1999) 13880-13885
22. Koufopanou V., et al. The spatial scale of genetic differentiation in a model organism: the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 361 (2006) 1941-1946
23. Kuehne H.A., et al. Allopatric divergence, secondary contact, and genetic isolation in wild yeast populations. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) 407-411
24. Yoneyama M. Studies on natural habitats of yeasts-bark-inhabiting yeasts. J. Sci. Hiroshima Univ. Ser. B Div. 2 (1957) 19-38
25. Kodama K. Ascosporogenous yeasts isolated from tree exudates in Japan. Ann. Microbiol. 24 (1974) 215-231
26. Banno I., and Mikata K. Ascomycetous yeasts isolated from forest materials in Japan. IFO Res. Comm. 10 (1981) 10-19
27. Morais P.B., et al. Yeasts associated with Drosophila in tropical forests of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Can. J. Microbiol. 38 (1992) 1150-1155
28. Naumov G.I., et al. A new genetically isolated population of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex from Brazil. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 67 (1995) 351-355
29. Naumov G.I., et al. Two new genetically isolated populations of the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex from Japan. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 41 (1995) 499-505
30. McGovern P.E., et al. Neolithic resinated wines. Nature 381 (1996) 480-481
31. Rose A.H., and Vijayalakshmi G. Baker's yeasts. In: Rose A.H., and Harrison J.S. (Eds). The Yeasts Vol. 5 (1993), Academic Press 357-397
32. Bell P.J.L., et al. Comparison of fermentative capacities of industrial baking and wild-type yeasts of the species Saccharomyces cerevisiae in different sugar media. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 32 (2001) 224-229
33. Kunkee R.E., and Bisson L.F. Wine-making yeasts. In: Rose A.H., and Harrison J.S. (Eds). The Yeasts Vol. 5 (1993), Academic Press 69-126
34. Ganter P.F., and Starmer W.T. Killer factor as a mechanism of interference competition in yeasts associated with cacti. Ecology 73 (1992) 54-67
35. Starmer W.T., et al. Geographic distribution and genetics of killer phenotypes for the yeast Pichia kluyveri across the United States. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 58 (1992) 990-997
36. Bussey H., et al. Mutual antagonism among killer yeast: competition between killers and a novel cDNA-based K1-K2 killer strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Can. J. Microbiol. 34 (1988) 38-44
37. Hammond J.R.M., and Eckersley K.W. Fermentation properties of brewing yeast with killer character. J. Inst. Brew. 90 (1984) 167-177
38. Greig D., and Travisano M. Density-dependent effects on allelopathic interactions in yeast. Evolution Int. J. Org. Evolution 62 (2008) 521-527
39. Mortimer R., and Polsinelli M. On the origins of wine yeast. Res. Microbiol. 150 (1999) 199-204
40. Tsai I.J., et al. Population genomics of the wild yeast Saccharomyces paradoxus: quantifying the life cycle. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 105 (2008) 4957-4962
41. Mortimer R.K. Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. Genome Res. 10 (2000) 403-409
42. Mortimer R.K., et al. Genome renewal: a new phenomenon revealed from a genetic study of 43 strains of Saccharomyces cerevisiae derived from natural fermentation of grape musts. Yeast 10 (1994) 1543-1552
43. Ruderfer D.M., et al. Population genomic analysis of outcrossing and recombination in yeast. Nat. Genet. 38 (2006) 1077-1081
44. Phaff H.J., and Knapp E.P. The taxonomy of yeasts found in exudates of certain trees and other natural breeding sites of some species of Drosophila. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 22 (1956) 117-130
45. Shehata A.M.E.T., et al. Yeasts isolated from Drosophila and from their suspected feeding places in southern and central California. Mycologia 47 (1955) 799-811
46. Carson H.L., et al. The yeast flora of the natural breeding sites of some species of Drosophila. Ecology 37 (1956) 538-544
47. Reuter M., et al. Increased outbreeding in yeast in response to dispersal by an insect vector. Curr. Biol. 17 (2007) R81-R83
48. Quispel A. Lourens G. M. Baas Becking (1895-1963), inspirator for many (micro)biologists. Int. Microbiol. 1 (1998) 69-72
49. Finlay B.J. Global dispersal of free-living microbial eukaryote species. Science 296 (2002) 1061-1063
50. Fenchel T., and Finlay B.J. The ubiquity of small species: patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54 (2004) 777-784
51. Finlay B.J., and Clarke K.J. Ubiquitous dispersal of microbial species. Nature 400 (1999) 828
52. Sampaio J.P., and Gonçalves P. Natural populations of Saccharomyces kudriavzevii in Portugal are associated with oak bark and are sympatric with S. cerevisiae and S. paradoxus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74 (2008) 2144-2152
53. Dujon B., et al. Genome evolution in yeasts. Nature 430 (2004) 35-44
54. Butler G., et al. Evolution of the MAT locus and its Ho endonuclease in yeast species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 101 (2004) 1632-1637
55. Koufopanou V., and Burt A. Degeneration and domestication of a selfish gene in yeast: molecular evolution versus site-directed mutagenesis. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22 (2005) 1535-1538
56. Kellis M., et al. Proof and evolutionary analysis of ancient genome duplication in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature 428 (2004) 617-624
57. Thomson J.M., et al. Resurrecting ancestral alcohol dehydrogenases from yeast. Nat. Genet. 37 (2005) 630-635
58. Conant G.C., and Wolfe K.H. Increased glycolytic flux as an outcome of whole-genome duplication in yeast. Mol. Syst. Biol. 3 (2007) 1-12
59. Wagner A. Inferring lifestyle from gene expression patterns. Mol. Biol. Evol. 17 (2000) 1985-1987
60. Tautz D. Redundancies, development and the flow of information. Bioessays 14 (1992) 263-266
61. Smith V., et al. Functional analysis of the genes of yeast chromosome V by genetic footprinting. Science 274 (1996) 2069-2074
62. Wagner A. The role of pleiotropy, population size fluctuations, and fitness effects of mutations in the evolution of redundant gene functions. Genetics 154 (2000) 1389-1401
63. Peña-Castillo L., and Hughes T.R. Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes?. Genetics 176 (2007) 7-14
64. Landry C.R., et al. Genetic properties influencing the evolvability of gene expression. Science 317 (2007) 118-121
65. Maclean C.J., and Greig D. Prezygotic reproductive isolation between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Saccharomyces bayanus. BMC Evol. Biol. 8 (2008) 1
66. Naumov G.I. Genetic identification of biological species in the Saccharomyces sensu stricto complex. J. Ind. Microbiol. 17 (1996) 295-302
67. Greig D., et al. A role for the mismatch repair system during incipient speciation in Saccharomyces. J. Evol. Biol. 16 (2003) 429-437
68. Coyne J.A., and Orr H.A. Speciation (2004), Sinauer
69. Muller H.J. Isolating mechanisms, evolution, and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6 (1942) 71-125
70. Wu C.I., and Palopoli M.F. Genetics of postmating reproductive isolation in animals. Annu. Rev. Genet. 28 (1994) 283-308
71. Greig D., et al. Epistasis and hybrid sterility in Saccharomyces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 269 (2002) 1167-1171
72. Greig D. A screen for recessive speciation genes expressed in the gametes of F1 hybrid yeast. PLoS Genet. 3 (2007) 281-286
73. Greig D., et al. Hybrid speciation in experimental populations of yeast. Science 298 (2002) 1773-1775
74. Masneuf I., et al. New hybrids between Saccharomyces sensu stricto yeast species found among wine and cider production strains. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 64 (1998) 3887-3892
75. Groth C., et al. A natural chimeric yeast containing genetic material from three species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 49 (1999) 1933-1938
76. Dettman J.R., et al. Incipient speciation by divergent adaptation and antagonistic epistasis in yeast. Nature 447 (2007) 585-588
77. Leu J.Y., and Murray A.W. Experimental evolution of mating discrimination in budding yeast. Curr. Biol. 16 (2006) 280-286
78. Bevan E.A., and Makower M. The physiological basis of the killer character in yeast. Proc. 11th Int. Congr. Genet. 1 (1963) 203
79. Woods D.R., et al. A new killer factor produced by a killer/sensitive yeast strain. J. Gen. Microbiol. 81 (1974) 285-289
80. Young T.W., and Yagiu M. A comparison of the killer character in different yeasts and its classification. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 44 (1978) 59-77
81. Extremera A.L., et al. A new killer toxin produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Curr. Genet. 5 (1982) 17-19
82. Pfeiffer P., and Radler F. Purification and characterization of extracellular and intracellular killer toxins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain 28. J. Gen. Microbiol. 128 (1982) 2699-2706
83. Starmer W.T., et al. The ecological role of killer yeasts in natural communities of yeasts. Can. J. Microbiol. 33 (1987) 783-796
84. Herskowitz I. Life cycle of the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Rev. 52 (1988) 536-553
85. Zakharov I.A. Intratetrad mating and its genetic and evolutionary consequences. Russ. J. Genet. 41 (2005) 402-411
86. Knop M. Evolution of the hemiascomycete yeasts: on life styles and the importance of inbreeding. Bioessays 28 (2006) 696-708
87. Kwast K.E., et al. Genomic analyses of anaerobically induced genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: functional roles of Rox1 and other factors in mediating the anoxic response. J. Bacteriol. 184 (2002) 250-265
88. Geladé R., et al. Multi-level response of the yeast genome to glucose. Gen. Biol. 4 (2003) 233
89. Piskur J., and Langkjaer R.B. Yeast genome sequencing: the power of comparative genomics. Mol. Microbiol. 53 (2004) 381-389
90. Fleet G.H. Yeast interactions and wine flavour. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 86 (2003) 11-22
91. Harkins H.A., et al. Bud8p and Bud9p, proteins that may mark the sites for bipolar budding in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 12 (2001) 2497-2518
92. Fischer G., et al. Chromosomal evolution in Saccharomyces. Nature 405 (2000) 451-454