Lossy 3D JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images in patients with acute abdominal complaints: Effect of compression ratio on diagnostic confidence and accuracy

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 476-484

  Ringl, Helmut ^a   Schernthaner, Ruediger ^a   Sala, Evis ^b   El Rabadi, Karem ^a   Weber, Michael ^a   Schima, Wolfgang ^a   Herold, Christian J ^a   Dixon, Adrian K ^b  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; COMPRESSION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; FRIEDMAN TEST; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOSSY THREE DIMENSIONAL JOINT PHOTOGRAPHIC EXPERTS GROUP 2000 COMPRESSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARAMETER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TECHNIQUE; ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ABDOMEN, ACUTE; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTIFACTS; DATA COMPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 49049115376     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482071586     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Reiner BI, Siegel EL, Hooper FJ, Pomerantz S, Dahlke A, Rallis D. Radiologists' productivity in the interpretation of CT scans: a comparison of PACS with conventional film. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001;176:861-864.
2. Rubin GD. Data explosion: the challenge of multidetector-row CT. Eur J Radiol 2000;36:74-80.
3. Fang YC, Yang MC, Hsueh YS. Financial assessment of a picture archiving and communication system implemented all at once. J Digit Imaging 2006;19(suppl 1):44-51.
4. Pratt HM, Langlotz CP, Feingold ER, Schwartz JS, Kundel HL. Incremental cost of department-wide implementation of a picture archiving and communication system and computed radiography. Radiology 1998;206:245-252.
5. Kalyanpur A, Weinberg J, Neklesa V, Brink JA, Forman HP. Emergency radiology coverage: technical and clinical feasibility of an international teleradiology model. Emerg Radiol 2003;10:115-118.
6. Brennecke R, Burgel U, Rippin G, Post F, Rupprecht HJ, Meyer J. Comparison of image compression viability for lossy and lossless JPEG and Wavelet data reduction in coronary angiography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2001;17:1-12.
7. Skodras A, Christopoulos C, Ebrahimi T. JPEG2000: the upcoming still image compression standard. Pattern Recognit Lett 2001;22:1337-1345.
8. Erickson BJ, Manduca A, Palisson P, et al. Wavelet compression of medical images. Radiology 1998;206:599-607.
9. Christopoulos C, Skodras A, Ebrahimi T. The JPEG2000 still image coding system: an overview. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 2000;46:1103-1127.
10. Persons K, Palisson P, Manduca A, Erickson BJ, Savcenko V. An analytical look at the effects of compression on medical images. J Digit Imaging 1997;10:60-66.
11. DICOM Standards Committee Working Group 4: compression - JPEG2000 transfer syntaxes. Rosslyn, Va: National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 2000; supp 61.
12. Goldberg MA, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, et al. Focal hepatic lesions: effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. Radiology 1997;202:159-165.
13. Zalis ME, Hahn PF, Arellano RS, Gazelle GS, Mueller PR. CT colonography with teleradiology: effect of lossy wavelet compression on polyp detection - initial observations. Radiology 2001;220:387-392.
14. Ringl H, Schernthaner RE, Kulinna-Cosentini C, et al. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality. Radiology 2007;245:467-474.
15. Dähnert W. Radiology review manual. 4th ed. Philadelphia, Pa: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 1999.
16. Wallace GK. The JPEG still picture compression standard. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 1992;38:xviii-xxxiv.
17. Skodras A, Christopoulos C, Ebrahimi T. The JPEG 2000 still image compression standard. IEEE Signal Process Mag 2001;9:36-58.
18. Bruce KTH, Vincent YT, Marco M, Doris TC. Mathematical model to quantify JPEG block artifacts. In: Kim Y, ed. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 1993 - image capture, formatting, and display. Vol 1897. Newport Beach, Calif: International Society for Optical Engineering, 1993; 269-275.
19. Sheikh HR, Bovik AC, Cormack L. No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000. IEEE Trans Image Process 2005;14:1918-1927.
20. Kalyanpur A, Neklesa VP, Taylor CR, Daftary AR, Brink JA. Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission. Radiology 2000;217:772-779.
21. Megibow AJ, Rusinek H, Lisi V, et al. Computed tomography diagnosis utilizing compressed image data: an ROC analysis using acute appendicitis as a model. J Digit Imaging 2002;15:84-90.
22. Lee KH, Kim YH, Kim BH, et al. Irreversible JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT for primary interpretation: assessment of visually lossless threshold. Eur Radiol 2007;17:1529-1534.
23. Woo HS, Kim KJ, Kim TJ, et al. JPEG 2000 compression of abdominal CT: difference in tolerance between thin- and thick-section images. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;189:535-541.
24. Siegel EL, Siddiqui K, Johnson J, et al. Compression of multislice CT: 2D vs. 3D JPEG2000 and effects of slice thickness. In: Ratib OM, Horii SC, eds. Proceedings of SPIE: medical imaging 2005 - PACS and imaging informatics. Vol 5748. Bellingham, Wash: International Society for Optical Engineering, 2005; 162-170.
25. Kim B, Lee KH, Kim KJ, et al. Prediction of perceptible artifacts in JPEG 2000 compressed chest CT images using mathematical and perceptual quality metrics. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2008;190:328-334.