Computed tomography diagnosis utilizing compressed image data: An ROC analysis using acute appendicitis as a model

Journal of Digital Imaging

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 84-90

  Megibow, Alec J ^a,b   Rusinek, Henry ^a   Lisi, Virna ^a   Bennett, Genevieve L ^a   Macari, Michael ^a   Israel, Gary M ^a   Krinsky, Glenn A ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Appendix CT; Computed tomography; Image compression; Image processing

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOGRAPHY; IMAGE COMPRESSION; MEDICAL IMAGING; RADIOLOGY; SURGERY; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

IMAGE DATA; RADIOLOGISTS; RECEIVER-OPERATING CHARACTERISTICS (ROC); WAVELET COMPRESSION;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ACUTE APPENDICITIS; ALGORITHM; AREA UNDER THE CURVE; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; COMPUTER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; ILEOCECAL VALVE; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MONITOR; PAIN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RANDOMIZATION; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; SAMPLE SIZE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; WAVEFORM; ACUTE DISEASE; APPENDICITIS; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; ROC CURVE;

ACUTE DISEASE; ALGORITHMS; APPENDICITIS; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0036616980     PISSN: 08971889     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10278-002-0009-4     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aberie DR, Gleeson F, Sayre JW, et al: The effect of irreversible image compression on diagnostic accuracy in thoracic imaging. Invest Radiol 28:398-403, 1993
2. Bae KT, Whiting BR: CT data storage reduction by means of compressing projection data instead of images: Feasibility study. Radiology 219:850-855, 2001
3. Baker WA, Hearne SE, Spero LA, et al: Lossy (15:1) JPEG compression of digital coronary angiograms does not limit detection of subtle morphological features. Circulation 96:1157-1164, 1997
4. Balthazar EJ, Birnbaum BA, Yee J, et al: Acute appendicitis: CT and US correlation in 100 patients. Radiology 190:31-35, 1994
5. Beall DP, Shelton PD, Kinsey TV, et al: Image compression and chest radiograph interpretation: Image perception comparison between uncompressed chest radiographs and chest radiographs stored using 10:1 JPEG compression. J Digit Imaging 13:33-38, 2000 (suppl 1)
6. Birnbaum BA, Jeffrey RB Jr: CT and sonographic evaluation of acute right lower quadrant abdominal pain. AJR Am J Roentgenol 170:361-371, 1998
7. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR: Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology 215:337-348, 2000
8. Buccigrossi RW, Simoncelli EP: Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain. IEEE Trans Image Processing 8:1688-1701, 1999
9. Cosman PC, Davidson HC, Bergin CJ, et al: Thoracic CT images: Effect of lossy image compression on diagnostic accuracy. Radiology 190:517-524, 1994
10. Goldberg MA: Image data compression. J Digit Imaging 10:9-11, 1997 (suppl 1)
11. Goldberg MA, Gazelle GS, Boland GW, et al: Focal hepatic lesions: Effect of three-dimensional wavelet compression on detection at CT. Radiology 202:159-165, 1997
12. Goldberg MA, Pivovarov M, Mayo-Smith WW, et al: Application of wavelet compression to digitized radiographs. AJR Am J Roentgenol 163:463-468, 1994
13. Good WF, Maitz GS, Gur D: Joint photographic experts group (JPEG) compatible data compression of mammograms. J Digit Imaging 7:123-132, 1994
14. Jacobs JE, Birnbaum BA, Macari M, Megibow AJ, et al: Acute appendicitis: Comparison of helical CT diagnosis focused technique with oral contrast material versus non-focused technique with oral and intravenous contrast material. Radiology 220:683-690, 2001
15. Kajiwara K: JPEG compression for PACS. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 37:343-351, 1992
16. Kalyanpur A, Neklesa VP, Taylor CR, et al: Evaluation of JPEG and wavelet compression of body CT images for direct digital teleradiologic transmission. Radiology 217:772-779, 1992
17. Kerensky RA, Cusma JT, Kubilis P, et al: American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology International Study of Angiographic Data Compression Phase I: The effect of lossy data compression on recognition of diagnostic features in digital coronary angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol 35:1370-1379, 2000
18. MacMahon H, Doi K, Sanada S, et al: Data compression: Effect on diagnostic accuracy in digital chest radiography. Radiology, 178:175-179, 1991
19. Olshausen BA, Field DJ: Natural image statistics and efficient coding. Network Computation in Neural Systems 7:333-339, 1996
20. Powell KA, Mallasch PG, Obuchowski NA, Kerczewski RJ, et al: Clinical evaluation of wavelet-compressed digitized screen-film mammography. Acad Radiol 7:311-316, 2000
21. Reiter E: Wavelet compression of medical imagery. Telemed J 2:131-137, 1996
22. Savcenko V, Erickson BJ, Palisson PM, et al: Detection of subtle abnormalities on chest radiographs after irreversible compression. Radiology 206:609-616, 1998
23. Schomer DF, Elekes AA, Hazle JD, et al: Introduction to wavelet-based compression of medical images. Radiographics 18:469-481, 1998
24. Shapiro J: Embedded image encoding using zerotrees of wavelet coefficients. IEEE Trans Image Processing 8:1688-1701, 1993
25. Slone RM, Foos DH, Whiting BR, et al: Assessment of visually lossless irreversible image compression: Comparison of three methods by using an image-comparison workstation. Radiology 215:543-553, 2000
26. Yamamoto LG: Using JPEG image compression to facilitate telemedicine. Am J Emerg Med 13:55-57, 1995
27. Zalis ME, Hahn PF, Arellano RS, et al: CT Colonography with teleradiology: Effect of lossy wavelet compression on polyp detection - Initial observations. Radiology 220:387-392, 2001
28. Zheng LM, Sone S, Itani Y, et al: Effect of of CT digital image compression on detection of coronary artery calcification. Acta Radiol 41:116-121, 2000