College faculty use and perceptions of electronic mail to communicate with students

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 53, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 159-176

  Duran, Robert L ^a   Kelly, Lynne ^a   Keaten, James A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Faculty use of e mail; Faculty student communication; Out of class communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 48949088334     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463370500090118     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Atamian, R, and DeMoville, W. (1998). Office hours—none. College Teaching, 46: 31–35.
2. Bailey, EK, and Cotlar, M. (1994). Teaching via the Internet. Communication Education, 43: 184–193.
3. D'Souza, PV. (1992). E-mail's role in the learning process: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25: 254–64.
4. Fusani, DS. (1994). “Extra-class” communication: Frequency, immediacy, self-disclosure, and satisfaction in student–faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 232–255.
5. Holsti O, (1969) Content analysis for the social sciences and humanities Reading MA Addison-Wesley
6. Jaasma, MA, and Koper, RJ. (1999). The relationship of student–faculty out-of-class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48: 41–47.
7. Hartman, K, Neuwirth, CM, Kiesler, S, Sproull, L, Cochran, C, Palmquist, M, and Zubrow, D. (1991). Patterns of social interaction and learning to write: Some effects of network technologies. Written Communication, 8: 79–113.
8. Haworth, B. (1999). An analysis of the determinants of student e-mail use. Journal of Education for Business, 75: 55–59.
9. Kelly, L, Duran, RL, and Zolten, JJ. (2001). The effect of reticence on college students’ use of electronic mail to communicate with faculty. Communication Education, 50: 170–176.
10. Kelly, L, Keaten, JA, and Finch, C. (2004). Reticent and non-reticent college students’ preferred communication channels for interacting with faculty. Communication Research Reports, 21: 197–209.
11. Kuehn, SA. (1994). Computer-mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education, 43: 171–183.
12. Manning, LM. (1996). Economics on the Internet: Electronic mail in the classroom. Journal of Economic Education, 27: 201–204.
13. Martin, MM, Myers, SA, and Mottet, TP. (1999). Students’ motives for communicating with their instructors. Communication Education, 48: 155–164.
14. McComb, M. (1994). Benefits of computer-mediated communication in college courses. Communication Education, 43: 159–170.
15. Milem, JF, and Berger, JB. (1997). A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38: 387–400.
16. O'Sullivan, PB. (2000). What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26: 403–431.
17. Pascarella ET, Terenzini PT, (1991) How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
18. Sitkin, SB, Sutcliffe, KM, and Barrios-Choplin, JR. (1992). A dual-capacity model of communication media choice in organizations. Human Communication Research, 18: 563–598.
19. Strauss A, (1987) Qualitative analysis for the social sciences New York Cambridge University Press
20. Terenzini, PT, Pascarella, ET, and Blimling, GS. (1996). Students’ out-of-class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37: 149–162.
21. Waldeck, JH, Kearney, P, and Plax, TG. (2001). Teacher e-mail message strategies and students’ willingness to communicate online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29: 54–70.
22. Woods RH, Jr (2002) How much communication is enough in online courses?—Exploring the relationship between frequency of instructor-initiated personal email and learners’ perceptions of and participation in online learning International Journal of Instructional Media 29 377 394
23. Zagorsky, JL. (1997). E-mail, computer usage and college students: A case study. Education, 118: 47–55.
24. Zolten JJ, (1997, November) E-mail bonding: Making the most of electronic communication between teacher and student Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Communication Association Chicago