Reticent and non‐reticent college students’ preferred communication channels for interacting with faculty

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 197-209

  Kelly, Lynne ^a   Keaten, James A ^b   Finch, Cynthia ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HARTFORD   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTHERN COLORADO   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250182130     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090409359981     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cahn, D. D., 1999. Computer mediated communication as a teaching method: Editorial preface. The Electronic Journal of Communication,: 9 Retrieved January 11, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.cios.org/www/ejc/v9n199.htm
2. Carlson, R. E., and Wright, D. G., 1993. Computer anxiety and communication apprehension: Relationship and introductory college course effects. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9: 329–338.
3. D'Souza, P. V., 1992. E‐mail's role in the learning process: A case study. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25: 254–64.
4. Frymier, A. B., and Houser, M. L., 2000. The teacher‐student relationship as an interpersonal relationship. Communication Education, 49: 207–219.
5. Fusani, D. S., 1994. “Extra‐class”; communication: Frequency, immediacy, self‐disclosure, and satisfaction in student‐faculty interaction outside the classroom. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 22: 232–255.
6. Jaasma, M. A., and Koper, R. J., 1999. The relationship of student‐faculty out‐of‐class communication to instructor immediacy and trust and to student motivation. Communication Education, 48: 41–47.
7. Keaten, J.A., and Kelly, L., 2000. Reticence: An affirmation and revision. Communication Education, 49: 165–177.
8. Keaten, J. A., Kelly, L., and Finch, C., 1997. Development of an instrument to measure reticence. Communication Quarterly, 45: 37–54.
9. Keaten, J.A., Kelly, L., and Finch, C., Effects of the Penn State Reticence Program on beliefs about communication and fear of negative evaluation. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association. Chicago, IL. November.
10. Kelly, L., Duran, R. L., and Zolten, J. J., 2001. The effect of reticence on college students’ use of electronic mail to communicate with faculty. Communication Education, 50: 170–176.
11. Kuehn, S. A., 1994. Computer‐mediated communication in instructional settings: A research agenda. Communication Education, 43: 171–183.
12. Kumari, S., 1999. Technological change and its impact on teaching in higher education institutions. The Electronic Journal of Communication,: 9 Retrieved January 11, 2002 from the World Wide Web: http://www.cios.org/getfile\Kumari_v9n199
13. Milem, J. F., and Berger, J. B., 1997. A modified model of college student persistence: Exploring the relationship between Astin's theory of involvement and Tinto's theory of student departure. Journal of College Student Development, 38: 387–400.
14. O'Sullivan, P. B., 2000. What you don't know won't hurt me: Impression management functions of communication channels in relationships. Human Communication Research, 26: 403–431.
15. Pascarella, E. T., and Terenzini, P. T., 1991. How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research, San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass.
16. Patterson, B. R., and Gojdycz, T. K., 2000. The relationship between computer‐mediated communication and communication related anxieties. Communication Research Reports, 17: 278–287.
17. Prusank, D. T., Duran, R. L., and Kelly, L., Communication apprehension and teacher‐student communication outside the classroom. Paper presented at the meeting of the Speech Communication Association. San Antonio, TX. November.
18. Scott, C. R., and Rockwell, S. C., 1997. The effect of communication, writing, and technology apprehension on likelihood to use new communication technologies. Communication Education, 46: 44–62.
19. Sitkin, S. B., Sutcliffe, K. M., and Barrios‐Choplin, J. R., 1992. A dual‐capacity model of communication media choice in organizations. Human Communication Research, 18: 563–598.
20. Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T., and Blimling, G. S., 1996. Students’ out‐of‐class experiences and their influence on learning and cognitive development: A literature review. Journal of College Student Development, 37: 149–162.
21. Waldeck, J. H., Kearney, P., and Plax, T. G., 2001. Teacher e‐mail message strategies and students’ willingness to communicate online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29: 54–70.
22. Walther, J. B., 1994. Anticipated ongoing interaction versus channel effects on relational communication in computer‐mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 20: 473–501.
23. Walther, J. B., 1996. Computer‐mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 23: 3–43.
24. Zolten, J. J., E‐mail bonding: Making the most of electronic communication between teacher and student. Paper presented at the meeting of the National Communication Association. Chicago. November.