Graduate students' perceptions of contrapower sexual harassment

Journal of Interpersonal Violence

Volumn 23, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1258-1276

  Mohipp, Charmaine ^a   Senn, Charlene Y ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WINDSOR   (Canada)

Author keywords

Academia; Graduate students; Sexual harassment; Social power; Unwanted sexual experiences

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CONTROL; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PERSUASIVE COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL HARASSMENT; STUDENT;

ADULT; COERCION; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNAL-EXTERNAL CONTROL; MALE; POWER (PSYCHOLOGY); QUESTIONNAIRES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL HARASSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STUDENTS;

EID: 48849108599     PISSN: 08862605     EISSN: 15526518     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0886260508314299     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Benson, K. (1984). Comments on Crockers' "An analysis of university definitions of sexual harassment." Signs, 6, 516-519.
2. Bradburn, N.M. (1992). A response to the nonresponse problem. Public Opinion Quarterly, 56, 391-397.
3. DeSouza, E., & Fansler, A.G. (2003). Contrapower sexual harassment: A survey of students and faculty members. Sex Roles, 48, 529-542.
4. Fassinger, R. (1994). Development and testing of the Attitudes toward Feminism and the Women's Movement (FWM) scale. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 389-402.
5. Grauerholz, F. (1989). Sexual harassment of women professors by students: Exploring the dynamics of power, authority and gender in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21, 789-801.
6. Gruber, J. E. (1997). An epidemiology of sexual harassment: Evidence from North America and Europe. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, & treatment (pp. 84-98). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Gutek, B., & Koss, M.P. (1993). Changed women and changed organizations: Consequences of and coping with sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 28-48.
8. Kelchtermans, G. (1996). Teacher vulnerability: Understanding its moral and political roots. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 307-323.
9. Matchen, J., & DeSouza, E. (2000). The sexual harassment of faculty members by students. Sex Roles, 42, 295-306.
10. Mazer, D.B., & Percival, E.F. (1989). Ideology or experience? The relationship among perceptions, attitudes, and experiences of sexual harassment in university students. Sex Roles, 20, 135-147.
11. McCabe, M.P., & Hardman, L. (2005). Attitudes and perceptions of workers to sexual harassment. Journal of Social Psychology, 145, 719-740.
12. McKinney, K. (1990). Sexual harassment of university faculty by colleagues and students. Sex Roles, 23, 421-438.
13. McKinney, K. (1992). Contrapower sexual harassment: The effects of student sex and type of behavior on faculty perceptions. Sex Roles, 27, 627-643.
14. McKinney, K., & Crittendon, K. (1992). Contrapower sexual harassment: The offender's viewpoint. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology, 20, 3-10.
15. McKinney, K., Olson, C., & Satterfield, A. (1988). Graduate students' experiences with and responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 3, 319-325.
16. Pryor, J.B. (1985). The layperson's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 13, 273-286.
17. Pryor, J.B., & Day, J.D. (1988). Interpretations of sexual harassment: An attributional analysis. Sex Roles, 18, 405-417.
18. Rosch, E., Mervis, C.B., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8, 382-439.
19. Rospenda, K.M., Richman, J.A., & Nawyn, S.J. (1998). Doing power: The confluence of gender, race, and class in contrapower sexual harassment. Gender and Society, 12, 40-60.
20. Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D.H., & Sackett, P.R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914-922.
21. Saunders, D.M., Fisher, W.A., Hewitt, E.C., & Clayton, J.P. (1985). A method for empirically assessing volunteer selection effects: Recruitment procedures and responses to erotica. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49 (6). 1703-1712.
22. Schneider, B.E. (1987). Graduate women, sexual harassment, and university policy. Journal of Higher Education, 58, 46-65.
23. Senn, C.Y., Desmarais, S., Verberg, N., & Wood, E. (2000). Sampling the reluctant participant: A random-sample response-rate study of men and sexual coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 96-105.
24. Tangri, S., Burt, M., & Johnson, L. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33-54.
25. Wayne, J.H. (2000). Disentangling the power bases of sexual harassment: Comparing gender, age, and position power. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57, 301-325.