Disentangling the Power Bases of Sexual Harassment: Comparing Gender, Age, and Position Power

Journal of Vocational Behavior

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 301-325

  Wayne, Julie Holliday ^a  

^a WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0006745936     PISSN: 00018791     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jvbe.1999.1750     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Baird C., Bensko N., Bell P., Viney W., Woody W. Gender influence on perceptions of hostile environment sexual harassment. Psychological Reports. 77:1995;79-82.
2. Baker D., Terpstra D., Cutler B. Perceptions of sexual harassment: A reexamination of gender differences. The Journal of Psychology. 124:1990;409-416.
3. Baker D., Terpstra D., Larntz K. The influence of individual characteristics and severity of harassing behavior on reactions to sexual harassment. Sex Roles. 22:1990;305-325.
4. Barak A., Pitterman Y., Yitzhaki R. An empirical test of the role of power differential in originating sexual harassment. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 17:1995;497-517.
5. Bornstein B. David, Goliath, and Reverend Bayes: Prior beliefs about defendants' status in personal injury cases. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 8:1994;233-258.
6. Bursik K. Perceptions of sexual harassment in an academic context. Sex Roles. 27:1992;401-412.
7. Cigoy P. Harmless amusement or sexual harassment?: The reasonableness of the reasonable woman standard. Pepperdine Law Review. 20:1993;1071-1110.
8. Cleveland J., Kerst M. Sexual harassment and perceptions of power: An underarticulated relationship. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 42:1993;49-67.
9. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 1977;Academic Press, New York.
10. Cohen A., Gutek B. Dimensions of perceptions of social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Sex Roles. 13:1985;317-327.
11. DuBois C., Knapp D., Faley R., Kustis G. An empirical examination of same- and other-gender sexual harassment in the workplace. Sex Roles. 39:1998;731-749.
12. Ellis S., Barak A., Pinto A. Moderating effects of personal cognitions on experienced and perceived sexual harassment of women at the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 21:1991;1320-1337.
13. Ellison v. Brady, 1991. 924 F. 2d 872, 881-82.
14. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, 1999, Sexual harassment charges EEOC & FEPAs combined: FY 1991-FY 1997. Retrieved January 2, 1999 from the World Wide Web, http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/harass.html.
15. Fain T., Anderton D. Sexual harassment: Organizational context and diffuse status. Sex Roles. 5-6:1987;291-311.
16. Fitzgerald L., Drasgow F., Hulin C., Gelfand M., Magley V. Antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology. 82:1997;578-589.
17. Fitzgerald L., Shullman S. Sexual harassment: A research analysis and agenda for the 1990's. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 42:1993;5-27.
18. Frazier P., Cochran C., Olson A. Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues. 51:1995;21-37.
19. Gowan M., Zimmerman R. Impact of ethnicity, gender, and previous experience on juror judgments in sexual harassment cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 26:1996;596-617.
20. Gutek B. How subjective is sexual harassment? An examination of rater effects. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 17:1995;447-467.
21. Gutek B., Morasch B., Cohen A. G. Interpreting social-sexual behavior in a work setting. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 22:1983;30-48.
22. Gutek B., O'Connor M. The empirical basis for the reasonable woman standard. Journal of Social Issues. 51:1995;151-166.
23. Hartnett J., Robinson D., Singh B. Perceptions of males and females toward sexual harassment and acquiescence. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 4:1989;291-298.
24. Hendrix W., Rueb J., Steel R. Sexual harassment and gender differences. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality. 13:1998;235-252.
25. Hunter C., McClelland K. Honoring accounts for sexual harassment: A factorial survey analysis. Sex Roles. 24:1991;725-752.
26. Hymes R., Leinart M., Rowe S., Rogers W. Acquaintance rape: The effect of race of defendant and race of victim on White juror decisions. The Journal of Social Psychology. 133:1993;627-634.
27. Johnson P. The reasonable woman in sexual harassment law: Progress or illusion? Wake Forest Law Review. 28:1993;619-669.
28. Katz R., Hannon R., Whitten L. Effects of gender and situation on perception of sexual harassment. Sex Roles. 34:1996;35-42.
29. Leeser J., O'Donohue W. Normative issues in defining sexual harassment. O'Donohue W. Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment. 1997;Allyn & Bacon, Needham Heights.
30. Littler-Bishop S., Seidler-Feller D., Opaluch R. E. Sexual harassment in the workplace as a function of initiator's status: The case of airline personnel. Journal of Social Issues. 38:1982;137-148.
31. Loredo C., Reid A., Deaux K. Judgments and definitions of sexual harassment by high school students. Sex Roles. 32:1995;29-45.
32. Marks M. A., Nelson E. S. Sexual harassment on campus: Effects of professor gender on perception of sexually harassing behavior. Sex Roles. 28:1993;207-217.
33. Matsui T., Kakuyama T., Onglatco M., Ogutu M. Women's perceptions of social-sexual behavior: A cross-cultural replication. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 46:1995;203-215.
34. McQueen I. The management view: Sexual harassment in the workplace. 1982;McQueen & Son, Citrus Heights.
35. Popovich P., Gehlauf D., Jolton J., Everton W., Godinho R., Mastrangelo P., Somers J. Physical attractiveness and sexual harassment: Does every picture tell a story or every story draw a picture? Journal of Applied Social Psychology. 26:1996;520-542.
36. Popovich P., Gehlauf D., Jolton J., Somers J., Godinho R. Perceptions of sexual harassment as a function of sex of rater and incident form and consequence. Sex Roles. 27:1992;609-625.
37. Popovich P., Licata B., Nokovich D., Martelli T., Zoloty. Assessing the incidence and perceptions of sexual harassment behaviors among American undergraduates. Journal of Psychology. 120:1986;387-396.
38. Pryor J. B. The lay person's understanding of sexual harassment. Sex Roles. 13:1985;273-286.
39. Reilly M., Lott B., Gallogly S. Sexual harassment of university students. Sex Roles. 15:1986;333-358.
40. Rospenda K., Richman J., Nawyn S. Doing power: The confluence of gender, race, and class in contrapower sexual harassment. Gender & Society. 12:1998;40-60.
41. Stevens J. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. 1992;Erlbaum, Hillsdale.
42. Summers R. J. Effect of harasser performance status and complainant tolerance on reactions to a complaint of sexual harassment. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 49:1996;53-67.
43. Tangri S., Burt M., Johnson L. Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues. 38:1982;33-54.
44. Terpstra D., Baker D. A hierarchy of sexual harassment. Journal of Psychology. 121:1987;599-605.
45. Treger T. The reasonable woman? Unreasonable!!! Ellison v. Brady. Whittier Law Review. 14:1993;675-694.
46. Westman B. The reasonable woman standard: Preventing sexual harassment in the workplace. William Mitchell Law Review. 18:1992;795-828.