Contrapower sexual harassment: A survey of students and faculty members

Sex Roles

Volumn 48, Issue 11-12, 2003, Pages 529-542

  DeSouza, Eros ^a   Fansler, A Gigi ^b  

^a ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Lincoln College   (United States)

Author keywords

Coping skills; Gender differences; Mental health consequences; Sexual harassment

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038365190     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1023527329364     Document Type: Review

References (54)

1. Benson, K. (1984). Comments on Crocker's "An analysis of university definitions of sexual harassment." Signs, 9, 516-519.
2. Blumenthal, J. A. (1998). The reasonable woman standard: A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 33-59.
3. Buchanan, N. T. (2002, August). Integrating qualitative methods in examining racialized sexual harassment among African American women. In C. A. Bulger (Chair), Refining, expanding, and integrating knowledge of sexual harassment. Symposium conducted at the meeting of the International Coalition Against Sexual Harassment, Chicago, IL.
4. Carroll, L., & Ellis, K. (1989). Faculty attitudes toward sexual harassment: Survey results, survey process. Initiatives, 52, 35-41.
5. Cochran, C. C., Frazier, P. A., & Olson, A. M. (1997). Predictors of responses to unwanted sexual attention. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 207-226.
6. Dansky, B. S., & Kilpatrik, D. G. (1997). The effects of sexual harassment. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 152-174). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
7. Davis v. Monroe County Board of Education. 526 U.S. 629 (1999).
8. De Coster, S., Estes, S. B., & Mueller, C. W. (1999). Routine activities and sexual harassment in the workplace. Work and Occupations, 26, 21-49.
9. Dillman, D. A. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: Wiley.
10. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (2002, February). Sexual Harassment Charges EEOC & FEPAs Combined: FY 1992 - FY 2001. Washington, D.C. Retrieved August 9, 2002, from http://www.eeoc.gov/stats/harass.html
11. Ellerth v. Burlington Industries, Inc. 524 U.S. 742 (1998).
12. Faragher v. City of Boca Raton. 524 U.S. 725 (1998).
13. Fitzgerald, L. F. (1990). Sexual harassment: The definition and measurement of a construct. In M. A. Paludi (Ed.), Ivory power: Sexual harassment on campus (pp. 21-44). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Fitzgerald, L. F., Buchanan, N. T., Collinsworth, L. L. Magley, V. J., Ramos, A. M. (1999). Junk logic: The abuse defense in sexual harassment litigation. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 5, 730-759.
15. Fitzgerald, L. F., Drasgow, F., Hulin, C. L., Gelfand, M. J., & Magley, V. J. (1997). The antecedents and consequences of sexual harassment in organizations: A test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 578-589.
16. Fitzgerald, L. F., Gelfand, M. J., & Drasgow, F. (1995). Measuring sexual harassment: Theoretical and psychometric advances. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 17, 425-445.
17. Fitzgerald, L., & Ormerod, M. (1991). Perceptions of sexual harassment: The influence of gender and academic context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 15, 281-294.
18. Fitzgerald, L. F., Shullman, S., Bailey, N., Richards, M., Swecker, J., Gold, Y., et al. (1988). The incidence and dimensions of sexual harassment in academia and the workplace. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 32, 152-175.
19. Fitzgerald, L. F., Swan, S., & Magley, V. J. (1997). But was it really sexual harassment? Legal, behavioral, and psychological definitions of the workplace victimization of women. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 5-28). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
20. Fitzgerald, L. F., Weitzman, L. M., Gold, Y., & Ormerod, M. (1988). Academic harassment: Sex and denial in scholarly garb. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 12, 329-340.
21. Frazier, P. A., Cochran, C. C., & Olson, A. M. (1995). Social science research on lay definitions of sexual harassment. Journal of Social Issues, 51, 21-31.
22. Gelfand, M., Fitzgerald, L., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment: A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47, 164-177.
23. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491-512.
24. Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1997). Hostile and benevolent sexism: Measuring ambivalent sexist attitudes toward women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 119-135.
25. Glomb, T. M., Munson, L. J., Hulin, C. L., Bergman, M. E., & Drasgow, F. (1999). Structural equation models of sexual harassment: Longitudinal explorations and cross-sectional generalizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 14-28.
26. Grauerholz, E. (1989). Sexual harassment of women professors by students: Exploring the dynamics of power, authority, and gender in a university setting. Sex Roles, 21, 789-801.
27. Gutek, B. (1985). Sex and the workplace. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
28. Gutek, B. A., & Done, R. S. (2001). Sexual harassment. In R. K. Unger (Ed.), Handbook of the psychology of women and gender (pp. 367-387). New York: Wiley.
29. Hay, M. S., & Elig, T. W. (1999). The 1995 Department of Defense Sexual Harassment Survey: Overview and methodology. Military Psychology, 11, 233-242.
30. Hitlan, R. T., Schneider, K. T., Berggren, A., & Estrada, A. X. (2000, August). Coping with social-sexual behaviors in the military: An examination of female officers in the Swedish armed forces, Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
31. Katz, R. C., Hannon, R., & Whitten, L. (1996). Effects of gender and situation on the perception of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 34, 35-42.
32. Kelley, M. (2000), Sexual harassment in the 1990s. Journal of Higher Education, 71, 548-568.
33. LaRocca, M. A., & Kromrey, J. D. (1999). Perception of sexual harassment in higher education: Impact of gender and attractiveness. Sex Roles, 40, 921-940.
34. Matchen, J., & DeSouza, E. (2000). The sexual harassment of faculty members by students. Sex Roles, 42, 295-306.
35. McKinney, K. (1990). Sexual harassment of university faculty by colleagues and students. Sex Roles, 23, 421-438.
36. McKinney, K. (1992). Contrapower sexual harassment: The effects of student sex and type of behavior on faculty perception. Sex Roles, 27, 1-17.
37. McKinney, K. (1994). Sexual harassment and college faculty members. Deviant Behavior, 15, 171-191.
38. Munson, L. J., Hulin, C., & Drasgow, F. (2000), Longitudinal analysis of dispositional influences and sexual harassment: Effects on job and psychological outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 43, 21-46.
39. Powell, G. N. (1986). Effects of sex-role identity and sex on definitions of sexual harassment. Sex Roles, 14, 9-19.
40. Pryor, J. B. (1987). Sexual harassment proclivities in men. Sex Roles, 17, 269-290.
41. Pryor, J. B. (1998). The Likelihood to Sexually Harass scale. In C. M. Davis, W. H., Yarber, R. Bauserman, G., Schreer, & L. Davis (Eds.), Sexuality-related measures: A compendium (pp. 295-298). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
42. Pryor, J. B., Lavite, C. M., & Stoller, L. M. (1993). A social psychological analysis of sexual harassment: The person situation interaction. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 42, 68-83.
43. Pryor, J. B., & Meyers, A. B. (2000). Men who sexually harass women. In L. B. Schlesinger (Ed.), Serial offenders: Current thought, recent findings, unusual syndromes (pp. 201-228). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
44. Pryor, J. B., & Whalen, N. J. (1997). A typology of sexual harassment: Characteristics of harassers and the social circumstances under which sexual harassment occurs. In W. O'Donohue (Ed.), Sexual harassment: Theory, research, and treatment (pp. 130-151). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
45. Rospenda, K. M., Richman, J. A., & Nawyn, S. J. (1998). Doing power: The confluence of gender, race, and class in centrapower sexual harassment. Gender and Society, 12, 40-60.
46. Rotundo, M., Nguyen, D. H., & Sackett, P. R. (2001). A meta-analytic review of gender differences in perceptions of sexual harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 914-922.
47. Sundt, M. (1996). Understanding the characteristics of the sexual harasser. Initiatives, 57, 27-35.
48. Tangri, S. S., Burt, M. R., & Johnson, L. B. (1982). Sexual harassment at work: Three explanatory models. Journal of Social Issues, 38, 33-54.
49. Terpstra, D. E., & Baker, D. D. (1987). A hierarchy of sexual harassment. Journal of Psychology, 121, 599-605.
50. Timmerman, G., & Bajema, C. (1999). Sexual harassment in northwest Europe: A cross-cultural comparison. European Journal of Women's Studies, 6, 419-439.
51. Title IX. 20 U. S. C. § 1681-1688 (1972).
52. Veit, C. T., & Ware, J. E., Jr. (1983). The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, 51, 730-742.
53. Waldo, C. R., Berdahl, J. L., & Fitzgerald, L. F. (1998). Are men sexually harassed? If so by whom? Law and Human Behavior, 22, 59-79.
54. West, C., & Fensternmaker, S. (1997). Doing difference. In M. R. Walsh (Ed.), Women, men and gender: Ongoing debates (pp. 58-72). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.