A prospective randomized comparison of the Medtronic Advantage Supra and St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valves in the aortic position: Is there an additional benefit of supra-annular valve positioning?

Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery

Volumn 136, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 462-471

  Guenzinger, Ralf ^a   Eichinger, Walter Benno ^a   Hettich, Ina ^a   Bleiziffer, Sabine ^a   Ruzicka, Daniel ^a   Bauernschmitt, Robert ^a   Lange, Ruediger ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ADVERSE OUTCOME; AORTA STENOSIS; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; ENDOCARDITIS; FEMALE; GASTROINTESTINAL HEMORRHAGE; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE MASS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; ISCHEMIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MITRAL VALVE REGURGITATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STRESS ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; TRANSTHORACIC ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY;

AORTIC VALVE; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, STRESS; FEMALE; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 48649085251     PISSN: 00225223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.018     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Peterseim D.S., Cen Y.-Y., Cheruvu S., Landolfo K., Bashore T.M., Lowe J.E., et al. Long-term outcome after biologic versus mechanical aortic valve replacement in 841 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117 (1999) 890-897
2. Autschbach R., Walther T., Falk V., Kostelka M., Rosler A., Langebartels G., et al. Prospectively randomized comparison of different mechanical aortic valves. Circulation 102 (2000) III1-III4
3. Zellner J.L., Kratz J.M., Crumbley III A.J., Stroud M.R., Bradley S.M., Sade R.M., et al. Long-term experience with the St. Jude Medical valve prosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 68 (1999) 1210-1218
4. Bach D.S., Sakwa M.P., Goldbach M., Petracek M.R., Emery R.W., and Mohr F.W. Hemodynamics and early clinical performance of the St. Jude Medical Regent mechanical aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg 74 (2002) 2003-2009
5. Gelsomino S., Morocutti G., Da Col P., Masullo G., Carella R., Guzzi G., et al. Early in vivo hemodynamic results after aortic valve replacement with the St Jude Medical Regent mechanical heart valve in patients with pure aortic stenosis. J Card Surg 18 (2003) 125-132
6. Replacement Heart Valve Guidance. Food and Drug Administration, Version 4.1, October 1994.
7. Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Günzinger R., Bleiziffer S., Keithahn A., Bauernschmitt R., et al. The effective orifice area/patient aortic annulus area ratio: a better way to compare different bioprostheses? A prospective randomized comparison of the Mosaic and Perimount bioprostheses in the aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 13 (2004) 382-389
8. Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Gunzinger R., Kemkes B.M., Sosnowski A., Maiza D., et al. European experience with the Mosaic bioprosthesis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 124 (2002) 333-339
9. Devereux R.B., Alonso D.R., Lutas E.M., Gottlieb G.J., Campo E., Sachs I., et al. Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular hypertrophy: comparison to necropsy findings. Am J Cardiol 57 (1986) 450-458
10. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Briand M., Laforest I., and Cartier P. Hemodynamic performance during maximum exercise in adult patients with the Ross operation and comparison with normal controls and patients with aortic bioprostheses. Am J Cardiol 86 (2000) 982-988
11. Eriksson M.J., Rosfors S., Radegran K., and Brodin L.A. Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size. Am J Cardiol 83 (1999) 619-622 A10
12. Pibarot P., Dumesnil J.G., Lemieux M., Cartier P., Metras J., and Durand L.G. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve. J Heart Valve Dis 7 (1998) 211-218
13. Rahimtoola S.H. Perspective on valvular heart disease: an update. J Am Coll Cardiol 14 (1989) 1-23
14. Guenzinger R., Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Bleiziffer S., Wagner I., Bauernschmitt R., et al. Rest and exercise performance of the Medtronic Advantage bileaflet valve in the aortic position. Ann Thorac Surg 80 (2005) 1319-1326
15. O'Rourke LGC, Ghosh CP, Shu M. Unsteady 3-D computational fluid dynamic simulation of Medtronic model 7760 prosthetic mechanical heart valves. Adaptive Research Report, March 1999.
16. Yoganathan A. Laser Doppler Velocimetry Studies Within the Hinge Region of a Clear Medtronic Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valve (1999), Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA
17. Eichinger W.B., Wagner I., Bleiziffer S., von Canal F., and Lange R. Occasional single-beat regurgitation observed with the new Medtronic ADVANTAGE bileaflet heart valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 131 (2006) 730-731
18. Wagner I.M., Eichinger W.B., Bleiziffer S., Botzenhardt F., Gebauer I., Guenzinger R., et al. Influence of completely supra-annular placement of bioprostheses on exercise hemodynamics in patients with a small aortic annulus. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133 (2007) 1234-1241
19. Izzat M.B., Birdi I., Wilde P., Bryan A.J., and Angelini G.D. Comparison of hemodynamic performances of St. Jude Medical and CarboMedics 21 mm aortic prostheses by means of dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 111 (1996) 408-415
20. Eichinger W.B., Botzenhardt F., Wagner I., Bleiziffer S., Ruzicka D., Guenzinger R., et al. Hemodynamic evaluation of the Sorin Soprano bioprosthesis in the completely supra-annular aortic position. J Heart Valve Dis 14 (2005) 822-827
21. Chambers J., Roxburgh J., Blauth C., O'Riordan J., Hodson F., and Rimington H. A randomized comparison of the MCRI On-X and CarboMedics Top Hat bileaflet mechanical replacement aortic valves: early postoperative hemodynamic function and clinical events. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 130 (2005) 759-764
22. Blais C., Dumesnil J.G., Baillot R., Simard S., Doyle D., and Pibarot P. Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 108 (2003) 983-988
23. Frapier J.M., Rouviere P., Razcka F., Aymard T., Albat B., and Chaptal P.A. Influence of patient-prosthesis mismatch on long-term results after aortic valve replacement with a stented bioprosthesis. J Heart Valve Dis 11 (2002) 543-551
24. Rao V., Jamieson W.R., Ivanov J., Armstrong S., and David T.E. Prosthesis-patient mismatch affects survival after aortic valve replacement. Circulation 102 (2000) III5-III9
25. Pibarot P., and Dumesnil J.G. Hemodynamic and clinical impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch in the aortic valve position and its prevention. J Am Coll Cardiol 36 (2000) 1131-1141
26. Tasca G., Brunelli F., Cirillo M., Amaducci A., Mhagna Z., Troise G., et al. Mass regression in aortic stenosis after valve replacement with small size pericardial bioprosthesis. Ann Thorac Surg 76 (2003) 1107-1113
27. Orsinelli D.A., Aurigemma G.P., Battista S., Krendel S., and Gaasch W.H. Left ventricular hypertrophy and mortality after aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. A high risk subgroup identified by preoperative relative wall thickness. J Am Coll Cardiol 22 (1993) 1679-1683
28. Dellgren G., Eriksson M.J., Blange I., Brodin L.A., Radegran K., and Sylven C. Angiotensin-converting enzyme gene polymorphism influences degree of left ventricular hypertrophy and its regression in patients undergoing operation for aortic stenosis. Am J Cardiol 84 (1999) 909-913
29. Scharhag J., Urhausen A., Schneider G., Rochette V., Kramann B., and Kindermann W. [Left ventricular mass in endurance-athletes with athlete's heart and untrained subjects-comparison between different echocardiographic methods and MRI]. Z Kardiol 92 (2003) 309-318
30. Baumgartner H., Khan S., DeRobertis M., Czer L., and Maurer G. Discrepancies between Doppler and catheter gradients in aortic prosthetic valves in vitro. A manifestation of localized gradients and pressure recovery. Circulation 82 (1990) 1467-1475