Hemodynamic performance during maximum exercise in adult patients with the Ross operation and comparison with normal controls and patients with aortic bioprostheses

American Journal of Cardiology

Volumn 86, Issue 9, 2000, Pages 982-988

  Pibarot, Philippe ^a   Dumesnil, Jean G ^a   Briand, Martin ^a   Laforest, Isabelle ^a   Cartier, Paul ^a  

^a LAVAL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DOBUTAMINE;

ADULT; AORTA VALVE REGURGITATION; AORTA VALVE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; AUTOGRAFT; BIOPROSTHESIS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; AORTIC VALVE; ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, DOPPLER; EXERCISE TOLERANCE; FEMALE; HEART VALVE DISEASES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESIS; HEMODYNAMIC PROCESSES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROGNOSIS; PULMONARY ARTERY; REFERENCE VALUES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TRANSPLANTATION, AUTOLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 0034332788     PISSN: 00029149     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9149(00)01134-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Replacement of aortic and mitral valves with a pulmonary autograft
2. Pulmonary autograft replacement in children. The ideal solution?
3. Replacement of the aortic root with a pulmonary autograft in children and young adults with aortic valve disease
4. Pulmonary autograft procedure for aortic valve disease; long-term results of the pioneer series
5. Cardiopulmonary response to maximal exercise in young athletes following the Ross procedure
6. Rest and exercise hemodynamics after the Ross procedure; an echocardiography study
7. Exercise hemodynamic performance of the pulmonary autograft following the Ross procedure
8. Hemodynamic and physical performance during maximal exercise in patients with an aortic bioprosthetic valve. Comparison of stentless versus stented bioprostheses
9. Pulmonary autograft-the optimal substitute for the aortic valve?
10. Usefulness of the indexed effective orifice area at rest in predicting an increase in gradient during maximum exercise in patients with a bioprosthesis in the aortic valve position
11. Differing mechanisms of exercise flow augmentation at the mitral and aortic valves
12. The effect of patient-prosthesis mismatch on aortic bioprosthetic valve hemodynamic performance and patient clinical status
13. Impact of prosthesis-patient mismatch on hemodynamic and symptomatic status, morbidity, and mortality after aortic valve replacement with a bioprosthetic heart valve
14. Rest and exercise hemodynamics of 20 to 23 mm allograft, Medtronic intact (porcine), and St. Jude medical valves in the aortic position
15. Value of exercise Doppler echocardiography in patients with prosthetic or bioprosthetic cardiac valves
16. Exercise hemodynamics in small (≤21mm) aortic valve prostheses assessed by Doppler echocardiography
17. Comparative rest and exercise hemodynamics of allograft and prosthetic valves in the aortic position
18. Effects of exercise on Doppler-derived pressure difference, valve resistance, and effective orifice area in different aortic valve prostheses of similar size
19. Evaluation of cryopreserved homografts in the right ventricular outflow tract after the Ross procedure; intermediate-term follow-up
20. Geometric mismatch of the aortic and pulmonary roots causes aortic insufficiency after the Ross procedure
21. Calcification of aortic homografts used for reconstruction of the right ventricular outflow tract
22. Outcome of pulmonary and aortic homografts for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction
23. Factors influencing medium-term performance of right-sided cryopreserved homografts
24. Histopathologic comparison of a pulmonary autograft and pulmonary homograft in a patient 17 months after a Ross procedure; an autopsy study
25. Effects of valve substitute on changes in left ventricular function and hypertrophy after aortic valve replacement
26. Changes in LV mass and function after aortic valve replacement; a comparison between stentless and stented bioprosthetic valves
27. Prospectively randomized evaluation of stentless versus conventional biological aortic valves. Impact on early regression of LV hypertrophy