'Unconscious transference' can be an instance of 'change blindness'

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 605-623

  Davis, Deborah ^a   Loftus, Elizabeth F ^b   Vanous, Samuel ^c   Cucciare, Michael ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATIVE MEMORY; ATTENTION; BRAIN FUNCTION; FALSE MEMORY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; UNCONSCIOUS TRANSFERENCE; UNCONSCIOUSNESS; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 48249156163     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1395     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Beck, M. R., Levin, D. T., & Angelone, B. (2007). Change blindness blindness: Beliefs about the roles of intention and scene complexity in change detection. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 31-51.
2. Christianson, S.-A. (1992). Emotional stress and eyewitness memory: A critical review. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 284-309.
3. Christianson, S.-A., & Safer, M. A. (1996). Emotional events and emotions in autobiographical memories. In D. C. Rubin (Ed.), Remembering our past: Studies in autobiographical memory (pp. 218-243). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Clifasefi, S. L., Takarangi, M. K. T., & Bergman, J. S. (2006). Blind drunk: The effects of alcohol on inattentional blindness. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 697-704.
5. Clifford, B. R., & Hollin, C. (1981). Effects of type of incident and the number of perpetrators on eyewitness memory. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 364-370.
6. Deffenbacher, K. A., Bornstein, B. H., & Penxod, S. D. (2006). Mugshot exposure effects: Retroactive interference, mugshot commitment, source confusion, and unconscious transference. Law and Human Behavior, 30, 287.
7. Johnson, M. K. (1988). Discriminating the origin of information. In T. F. Oltmanns, & B. A. Maher (Eds.), Delusional beliefs: Interdisciplinary perspectives (pp. 34-65). New York, NY: Wiley.
8. Levin, D. T. (2001). Visual metacognitions underlying change blindness blindness and estimates of picture memory. Poster presented at the Vision Sciences Conference, Sarasota, FL.
9. Levin, D. T. (2002). Change blindness blindness as visual metacognition. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9, 111-130.
10. Levin, D. T., Momen, N., Drivdahl, S. B., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Change blindness blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability. Visual Cognition. Special Issue: Change Blindness and Visual Memory, 7, 397-412.
11. Levin, D. R., Nausheen, M., Drivdahl, S. B., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Change blindness blindness: The metacognitive error of overestimating change-detection ability. Visual Cognition, 7, 397-412.
12. Levin, D. R., & Simons, D. J. (1997). Failure to detect changes to attended objects in motion pictures. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 501-506.
13. Levin, D. T., & Simons, D. J. (2000). Perceiving stability in a changing world: Combining shots and integrating views in motion pictures and the real world. Media Psychology, 2, 357-380.
14. Levin, D. T., Simons, D. J., Angelone, B. L., & Chabris, C. F. (2002). Memory for centrally attended changing objects in an incidental real-world change detection paradigm. British Journal of Psychology, 93, 289-302.
15. Lindsay, D. S. (1994). Memory source monitoring and eyewitness testimony. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and development (pp. 27-55). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
16. Loftus, E. F. (1976). Unconscious transference. Law and Psychology Review, 2, 93-98.
17. Loftus, E. F., Loftus, G. R., & Messo, J. (1987). Some facts about weapon focus. Law and Human Behavior, 11, 55-62.
18. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Pashler, H. (1988). Familiarity and visual change detection. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 369-378.
20. Phillips, M. R., Geiselman, R. E., Haghighi, D., & Lin, C. (1997). Some boundary conditions for bystander misidentification. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 24, 370-390.
21. Read, J. D., Tollestrup, P., Hammersley, R., McFadzen, E., & Christensen, A. (1990). The unconscious transference effect: Are innocent bystanders ever misidentified? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 4, 3-31.
22. Rensink, R. A. (2000). The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition, 7, 17-42.
23. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8, 368-373.
24. Ross, D. F., Ceci, S. J., Dunning, D., & Toglia, M. P. (1994). Unconscious transference and mistaken identity: When a witness misidentifies a familiar but innocent person. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 918-930.
25. Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York: Basic Books.
26. Schacter, D. L. (2001). The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Co.
27. Simons, D. J. (1996). In sight, out of mind: When object representations fail. Psychological Science, 7, 301-305.
28. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28, 1059-1074.
29. Simons, D. J., & Levin, D. T. (1998). Failure to detect changes to people during a real-world interaction. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 5, 644-649.
30. Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Science, 9, 16-20.
31. Sporer, S. L. (1993). Clothing as a contextual cue in facial recognition. German Journal of Psychology, 17, 183-199.
32. Steblay, N. M. (1992). A meta-analytic review of the weapon focus effect. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 413-424.
33. Thompson, D. M. (1988). Context and false recognition. In G. M. Davies, & D. M. Thompson (Eds.), Memory in context: Context in memory. New York, NY: Wiley.