Business giving, the tsunami and corporates as rock stars: Some implications for arts funding?

Cultural Trends

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 299-323

  Harrow, Jenny ^a   Palmer, Paul ^b   Bogdanova, Mariana ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Arts Funding; Corporate Giving; Corporate Philanthropy; Disaster Grant Making; Employee Giving

Indexed keywords

EID: 47949114012     PISSN: 09548963     EISSN: 14693690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09548960600922640     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abshire, M., 2004. Surviving ‘corporate adversity’. Corporate Philanthropy Report, 19 (4): 2–3.
2. Aronson, J., 1992. A pragmatic view of thematic analysis. The Qualitative Report, 2 (1) Retrieved from www.nova.edu.sss/QR/BackIssues?QR-2?aronson.html
3. Arts & Business. 2006. Private Investment Benchmarking Survey 2004/5: Summary report, Retrieved 27 February, 2006, from www.aandb.org.uk
4. Bennett, R., 2003. Factors underlying the inclination to donate to particular types of charity. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 8 (1): 12–29.
5. Burlingame, D. F., and Smith, C., 1999. The future of corporate giving. New Directions for Philanthropic Fundraising, 26: 59–77.
6. Business in the Community (BITC). 2005. Company support for the Tsunami Appeal., Retrieved 1 February, 2005, from www.bitc.org
7. Business in the Community. 2006. 2005 percent standard results, Retrieved 18 April, 2006, from www.bitc.org.uk/ptogrammes/programme_directory/percent_club/results_2005.html
8. Cavicchio, C., 2005. Responding to the Asian Tsunami disaster: Applying the lessons of 9/11. onPhilanthropy, Retrieved from www.onphilanthropy.com/bestpract/bp2005-01-12.html
9. Company support for the Tsunami appeal. 2005. Retrieved 1 February, 2005, from the BITC website www.bitc.org.uk/news/news_directory/tsunami_support.html
10. Cosgrave, J., 2005, December. Tsunami Evaluation Coalition: Interim findings, Active Learning Network for Accountability and Performance in Humanitarian Action (ALNAP). Retrieved from www.odi.org.uk/ALNAP
11. Cullingford and M. 2005, 21 September. Royal Opera House Drops ‘Vilar’ from Floral Hall. The Gramophone, Retrieved from http://www.gramophone.co.uk/newsMainTemplate.asp?storyID = 2459&newssectionID = 1
12. De Colle, S., and Gonella, C., 2002. The social and ethical alchemy: An integrative approach to social and ethical accountability. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11 (1): 86–96.
13. Doward, J., 2005, 13 February. Charities face closure after tsunami effect: Headlines lead to dip in donations. Guardian Unlimited, Retrieved 2 May 2005 from http://www.guardian.co.uk/tsunami/story/0,15671,1411849,00.htmlpage
14. Economic and Social Research Council/National Council for Voluntary Organizations. 2005, 24 June. Charitable giving and donor motivation, ESRC seminar series, ‘Mapping the Public Policy Landscape’. Retrieved from www.ncvo-org.uk/policy/index
15. Elsdon, R., 2002. Affiliation in the workplace: Value creation in the new organization, Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing.
16. European Foundation Centre (EFC). 2001. Disaster Grantmaking: a practical guide for foundations and corporations, The Report of Joint working group European Foundation Centre and The Council on Foundations (November). Retrieved 8 November 2004 from http://www.efc.be/ftp/public/IC/DisasterGrant-Making.pdf#search = %22EFC%20guide%20to%20disaster%22
17. Fishel, D., 2002. Australian philanthropy and the arts: How does it compare?. International Journal of Arts Management, 4 (2): 9–15.
18. Flynn, P., and Hodgkinson, V. A., 2002. Measuring the impact of the nonprofit sector, Edited by: Flynn, P., and Hodgkinson, V. A., New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
19. Glazebrook, M., 2005. The social construction of corporate citizenship. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 17: 53–67.
20. Global Compact Office. 2005, 7 January. “ Executive summary ”. In Briefing on global private sector response to Tsunami disaster, 1–4). New York: The Global Compact Office, United Nations Organisation, New York.
21. Greene, E., 2003, 9 June. Metropolitan Opera says Alberto Vilar has not honored donation pledge. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, Retrieved from www.philanthropy.com/free/update/2003/06/2003060901.htm
22. Greening, D. W., and Turban, D. B., 2000. Corporate social performance as a competitive advantage in attracting a quality workforce. Business and Society, 39 (3): 254–280.
23. Griffin, J., 2004. Corporate restructurings: Ripple effects on corporate philanthropy. Journal of Public Affairs, 4 (1): 27–43.
24. Hamil, S., 1999. Corporate community involvement: A case for regulatory reform. Business Ethics: A European Review, 8 (1): 14–25.
25. Hibbert, S., Chatzidakis, A., and Smith, A., 2005, 24 June. Help, Who? Me? In Economic and Social Research Council/National Council for Voluntary Organizations. Charitable giving and donor motivation, ESRC seminar series, ‘Mapping the Public Policy Landscape’. Retrieved from www.ncvo-org.uk/policy/index
26. Hornborg, A., 11 April 2005. “Beyond Control-Risk and Learning after the Tsunami”. 11 April, Sweden: Swedish South Asian Studies Network Seminar, Lund University. Retrieved 14 October 2005 from http://www.sasnet.lu.se/tsuamisemref.html. Retrieved 14 October, 2005, from http://www.sasnet.lu.se/tsunamisemref.html
27. Howe, P., and Devereux, S., 2004. Famine intensity and magnitude scales: A proposal for an instrumental definition of famine. Disasters, 28 (4): 353–372.
28. Höijer, B., 2004. The discourse of global compassion: The audience and media reporting of human suffering. Media, Culture and Society, 26 (4): 513–531.
29. Husted, B. W., 2003. Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or internalise?. Long Range Planning, 36 (5): 481–498.
30. International Children's Art Foundation. 2005. Healing arts for tsunami survivors: Overview, Retrieved from www.icaf.org/programs/healingarts/tsunami/index_tsunami.html
31. Jones, P., and Wilks-Heeg, S., 2004. Capitalising culture: Liverpool 2008. Local Economy, 19 (4): 341–360.
32. Keefe, J., 2005. Grant aims payroll giving at SMEs. Employee Benefits, March: 66–66.
33. Kirchberg, V., 1995. Arts sponsorship and the state of the city: The impact of local socio-economic conditions on corporate arts support. Journal of Cultural Economics (Historical Archive), 19 (4): 305–320.
34. Kirchberg, V., 2003. “ Corporate arts sponsorship ”. In A handbook of cultural economics, Edited by: Towse, R., 143–151. Cheltenham, MA, UK/Northampton: Edward Elgar.
35. Kreps, G. A., 1984. Sociological inquiry and disaster research. American Review of Sociology, 10: 309–330.
36. Kressner Cobb, N., 2002. The new philanthropy: Its impact on funding arts and culture. Journal of Arts Management, Law and Society, 32 (3): 125–143.
37. LeClair, M. S., and Gordon, K., 2000. Corporate support for artistic and cultural activities: What determines the distribution of corporate giving?. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24 (3): 225–241.
38. Lewis, G., and Brooks, A., 2005. A question of morality: Artists' values and public funding for the arts. Public Administration Review, 65 (1): 8–17.
39. Lewis, G. B., 2006. Public spending on the arts as morality policy: The structure of public attitudes. Policy Studies Journal, 34 (1): 131–138.
40. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., and Braig, B. M., 2004. The effect of CSR on customer donation to corporate-sponsored nonprofits. Journal of Marketing, 68 (4): 16–32.
41. MacEntire, D. A., 2004. Development, disasters and vulnerability: A discussion of divergent theories and the need for their integration. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 13 (3): 193–198.
42. Mohan, A., 2001. Corporate citizenship: Perspectives from India. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2: 107–117.
43. Moir, L., and Taffler, R., 2004. Does corporate philanthropy exist? Business giving to the arts in the U.K. Journal of Business Ethics,: 149–161.
44. Mullen, J., 1997. Performance-based corporate philanthropy: How giving smart can further corporate goals. Public Relations Quarterly, 42 (2): 42–48.
45. National Council for Voluntary Organizations and Charities Aid Foundation. 2005. UK Giving 2004/5, Retrieved from www.ncvo-vol.org.uk/giving
46. O'Hagan, J., and Harvey, D., 2000. Why do companies sponsor arts events? Some evidence and a proposed classification. Journal of Cultural Economics, 24 (3): 205–224.
47. O'Regan, T., 2001, 26 July. Cultural policy: Rejuvenate or wither, Queensland, Australia: Professorial lecture, Griffith University. Retrieved from www. gu.edu.au/ins/collections/proflects/oregan01.PDF
48. Ostrower, F., 2002. Trustees of culture: Power, wealth, and status on elite arts boards, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R., 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80 (12): 56–68.
50. Post, J. E., 2000. Meeting the challenge of global corporate citizenship, Boston, MA: Center for Corporate Citizenship, Boston College.
51. Pryce, V., 2002. CSR—Should it be the preserve of the usual suspects?. Business Ethics: A European Review, 11 (2): 140–142.
52. Quinn, B., 2005. Changing festival places: Insights from Galway. Social and Cultural Geography, 6 (2): 237–252.
53. Ricks, J., and Williams, J., 2005. Strategic Corporate Philanthropy: Addressing frontline talent needs through an educational giving program. Journal of Business Ethics, 60 (2) August: 147–157.
54. Romney-Alexander, D., 2002. Payroll giving in the UK: Donor incentives and influences on giving behaviour. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7 (1): 84–92.
55. Seifert, B., Morris, S. A., and Bartkus, B., 2004. Having, giving and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy and firms' financial performance. Business and Society, 43 (2): 135–161.
56. Shaluf, I. M., Ahmadun, F., and Said, A. M., 2003. A review of disasters and crises. Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 12 (1): 24–32.
57. Smith, N. C., 2003. Corporate social responsibility: Whether or how?. California Management Review, 45 (4): 52–76.
58. Steinberg, K. S., and Rooney, P. M., 2005. America gives: A survey of American generosity after September 11. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 34 (1): 110–135.
59. Strom, E., 2003. Cultural policy as development policy: Evidence from the United States. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 9 (3): 247–263.
60. Suparamaniam, N., and Dekker, S., 2003. Paradoxes of power: The separation of knowledge and authority in international disaster relief work. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 12 (4): 312–318.
61. Takeda, M. B., and Helms, M. M., 2006. Bureaucracy, meet catastrophe? Analysis of the Tsunami disaster relief efforts and their implications for global emergency governance. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19 (2): 204–217.
62. Thornton, E., 2002, 21 January. The sorrow and the purse strings. Business Week, 3766: 66
63. Tierney and K. 1993. Disaster preparedness and response: Research findings and guidance from the social science literature, Newark, DE: Disaster Research Centre and Department of Sociology, University of Delaware.
64. Twigg, J., 2001. Corporate social responsibility and disaster reduction: A global overview, London: Benfield Grieg Hazard Research Centre, University College London, and Department for International Development (DFID).
65. Uyangoda, J., 2005. Ethnic conflict, the state and the tsunami disaster in Sri Lanka. Inter-Asia Cultural Studies, 6 (3): 341–352.
66. Walker, C., 2002. Philanthropy, social capital or strategic alliance? The involvement of senior UK business executives with the voluntary sector and implications for corporate fundraising. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 7 (3): 219–228.
67. Walker, C., and Goodey, L., Paper presented at the 11th Researching the Voluntary Sector conference. 31 August– 1 September. The state of donations in the 21st century, National Council for Voluntary Organizations and the Voluntary Sector Studies Network, University of Warwick, Coventry. Unpublished
68. Waterman, S., 1998. Carnivals for elites? The cultural politics of arts festivals. Progress in Human Geography, 22 (1): 54–74.
69. Watson, F., 2002. Why are there no longer ‘war famines’ in contemporary Europe? The case of the besieged areas of Bosnia 1992–1995. IDS Bulletin, 33 (4): 39–47.
70. White, P., 2005. Tsunami focuses pay giving. Employee Benefits, February: 7
71. Williams, I., and Harrow, J., 2005, 25 April. First do no harm: An exploratory critique of the EFC/Council on Foundation's ‘guide to disaster grantmaking’, London: Cass Business School, City University. Economic and Social Research Council Research seminars series, ‘Grantmaking and grantmakers: Their roles, organization and impact’
72. Young, D., and Burlingame, D. F., 1996. “ Paradigm lost ”. In Corporate philanthropy at the crossroads, Edited by: Burlingame, D. F., and Young, D. R., 158–176. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.