Public spending on the arts as morality policy: The structure of public attitudes

Policy Studies Journal

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 131-138

  Lewis, Gregory B ^a,b  

^a GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLITICS; PUBLIC ATTITUDE;

EID: 33645050107     PISSN: 0190292X     EISSN: 15410072     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00149.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Bolton, Richard. 1992. Culture Wars: Documents from the Recent Controversies in the Arts. New York: New Press.
2. Brooks, Arthur C. 2001. "Who Opposes Government Arts Funding?" Public Choice 108: 355-67.
3. Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1980. "The Two Faces of Issue Voting." American Political Science Review 74: 78-91.
4. Chong, Dennis, and James N. Druckman. 2005. "Competitive Framing." Paper presented at annual meeting of American Political Science Association, Washington, DC, September 3, 2005.
5. Cummings, Milton C., Jr. 1991. "Government and the Arts: An Overview." In Public Money and the Muse: Essays on Government Funding for the Arts, ed. Stephen Benedict. New York: W.W. Norton.
6. Davis, James Allan, Tom W. Smith, and Peter V. Marsden. 2003. General Social Surveys, 1972-2002: Cumulative Codebook. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
7. DiMaggio, Paul, and Becky Pettit. 1999. Public Opinion and Political Vulnerability: Why Has the National Endowment for the Arts Been Such an Attractive Target? Working Paper 7, Center for Arts and Cultural Policy Studies, Princeton University, NJ.
8. Gormley, William T. 1986. "Regulatory Issue Networks in a Federal System." Polity 18: 595-620.
9. Heilbrun, James, and Charles M. Gray. 2001. The Economics of Art and Culture, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Hetherman, Luke. 1999. The National Endowment for the Arts: Essential for Cultural Growth, Democracy and Creative Expression in America [Online]. http://www.burbank.com/arts/nea.htm. Accessed September 22, 2005.
11. Jacoby, William G. 2000. "Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending." American Journal of Political Science 44: 750-67.
12. Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese. 2001. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. College Station TX: Stata Press.
13. Loth, Renee. 1992. "Buchanan says Bush Funded Obscene Art; Ad Uses Clip from Film on Gay Blacks." Boston Globe (February 27): 14.
14. Moen, Matthew C. 1997. "Congress and the National Endowment for the Arts: Institutional Patterns and Arts Funding, 1965-1994." Social Science Journal 34: 185-200.
15. Mooney, Christopher Z., ed. 2001. The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy. New York: Chatham House Publishers.
16. Nelson, Thomas E., Rosalee A. Clawson, and Zoe M. Oxley. 1997. "Media Framing of a Civil Liberties Conflict and its Effect on Tolerance." American Political Science Review 91: 567-84.
17. Throsby, David. 1994. "The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics." Journal of Economic Literature 32 (1): 1-29.
18. Wooldridge, Jeffrey M. 2003. Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach, 2nd ed. Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.