Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or internalize?

Long Range Planning

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2003, Pages 481-498

  Husted, Bryan W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; COSTS; INVESTMENTS;

ORGANIZATIONAL ECONOMICS;

SOCIAL ASPECTS;

CORPORATE STRATEGY; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INVESTMENT;

EID: 0141924211     PISSN: 00246301     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0024-6301(03)00115-8     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. K. Davis, The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities, Academy of Management Journal 16, 312-322 (1973).
2. O. E. Williamson, The Mechanisms of Governance in Oxford University Press, New York, NY (1996)p. 12.
3. Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, 2002 Report to the Nation: Occupational Fraud and Abuse. Available for download at http://marketplace.cfenet.com/media/2002RttN/.
4. J. J. Griffin and J. F. Mahon, The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: Twenty-five years of incomparable research, Business & Society 36(1), 5-31 (1997).
5. L. Burke and J. M. Logsdon, How corporate social responsibility pays off, Long Range Planning 29(4), 495-502 (1996).
6. N. N. Tichy, A. R. McGill and L. St. Clair (eds.), 1997. Corporate Global Citizenship: Doing Business in the Public Eye, The New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA (1997).
7. Joseph Galaskiewicz enumerates many kinds of CSR activities, but they can all be summarized by these three basic types (J. Galaskiewicz, 1997, An urban grants economy revisited: Corporate charitable contributions in the Twin Cities, 1979-81, 1987-89, Administrative Science Quarterly 42, 445-471.
8. V. Brudney and A. Ferrell, Corporate charitable giving, University of Chicago Law Review 69 (3), 1191-1218 (2002).
9. J. Mullen, Performance-based corporate philanthropy: How 'giving smart' can further corporate goals, Public Relations Quarterly 42(2), 42-48 (1997).
10. P. Milgrom and J. Roberts, Economics, Organization & Management in Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ (1992).
11. O. E. Williamson, Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives, Administrative Science Quarterly 36, 269-296 (1991).
12. O. E. Williamson, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism in Free Press, New York (1985).
13. P. Navarro, Why do corporations give to charity?, Journal of Business 61(1), 65-93 (1988).
14. J. G. March and H. A. Simon, Organizations in John Wiley, New York (1958).
15. L. Witham, Episcopalians seek New York probe of church trust funds, Washington Times, March 11:A2 (1997)
16. accesed by internet on April 9, 2003 at www.episcopalian.org/cclec/paper-ny-probe.htm. Associated Press,
17. J. D. Werbel and S. M. Carter, The CEO's influence on corporate foundation giving, Journal of Business Ethics 40(1,3), 47-60 (2002).
18. R. Jerome, M. Birkbeck and D. E. Leger, Fallen hero, People 58(7), 111-112 (2002).
19. S. Douglas and K. Mills, Nonprofit fraud: What are the key indicators? Canadian Fund Raiser, August 16 (2000).
20. J. W. Meyer and B. Rowan, Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony, American Journal of Sociology 83, 340-363 (1977).
21. K. R. Andrews, The Concept of Corporate Strategy in , 3rd edition, Irwin, Homestead, IL (1987).
22. B. Nooteboom, Research note: An analysis of specificity in transaction cost economics, Organization Studies 14(3), 443-451 (1993).
23. A. McWilliams and D. Siegel, Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective, Academy of Management Review 26(1), 117-127 (2001).
24. J. B. Barney, Strategic factor markets, expectations, luck, and business strategy, Management Science 32(10), 1231-1241 (1986).
25. D. J. Teece, Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets, California Management Review 40(3), 55-79 (1998).
26. P. R. G. Layard and A. A. Walters, Microeconomic Theory in McGraw-Hill, New York (1978).
27. M. Porter and C. Van der Linde, Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship, Journal of Economic Perspectives 9, 97-118 (1995). Long Range Planning, vol 36 2003 497
28. N. Mendelson and M. J. Polonsky, Using strategic alliances to develop credible green marketing, Journal of Consumer Marketing 12(2), 4-18 (1995).
29. K. M. File and R. A. Prince, Cause related marketing and corporate philanthropy in the privately held enterprise, Journal of Business Ethics 17, 1529-1539 (1998).
30. P. R. Varadarajan and A. Menon, Cause related marketing: A coalignment of marketing strategy and corporate philanthropy, Journal of Marketing 52(3), 58-74 (1988).
31. M. Granovetter, Economic action and social structure: A theory of embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology 91(3), 481-510 (1985).
32. N. Foss, Strategy, bargaining, and economic organization: Some thoughts on the transaction cost foundations of firm strategy, Working paper Copenhagen Business School (2000).
33. D. Burlingame, Corporate giving, International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing 6(1), 4-5 (2001).