A performance model interchange format

Journal of Systems and Software

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 63-80

  Smith, C U ^a   Williams, L G ^b  

^a Performance Engineering Services   (United States)

^b Software Engineering Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING; RESPONSE TIME (COMPUTER SYSTEMS);

PERFORMANCE MODEL INTERCHANGE FORMAT (PMIF);

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 0033322309     PISSN: 01641212     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0164-1212(99)00067-9     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Baldassari, M., et al., 1989. PROTOB: A Hierarchical Object-Oriented CASE Tool for Distributed Systems. Proceedings European Software Engineering Conference - 1989, Coventry, England.
2. Beilner, H., 1990. Structured Modelling and Tool Support, International Conference Performance of Computer and Computer Networks, Johannesburg and Stellenbosch, South Africa.
3. Beilner, H., Mater, J., Weissenburg, N., 1988. Towards a performance modeling environment: news on HIT. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, Plenum press, New York.
4. Bell, T.E. (Ed.), 1988. Special Issue on Software Performance Engineering, Computer Measurement Group Transactions.
5. Browne, J.C., et al., 1985. Graphical programming for simulation models of computer systems. Proceedings of the 18th Annual Simulation Symposium, Tampa, FL.
6. Buhr, R.J., et al., 1989. Software CAD: A Revolutionary Approach. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 15(3), 234-249.
7. Butler, J., (Ed.), 1995. Software Performance Engineering for Client/Server, Managing System Development. Applied Computer Research, Phoenix 15(10).
8. Crawford, J., Smith, R., 1984. An electronic design interchange format - EDIF. Proceedings of the IEEE ICCD 84, Rye Town Hilton, NY, pp. 82-86.
9. EDIF, EDIF Users "Group," Design Automation Department, Texas Instruments, P.O. Box 225474, MS-3668, Dallas, TX 75265.
10. EIA, 1994. CDIF - CASE Data Interchange Format Overview, No. EIA/IS-106, Engineering Department, Electronics Industries Association, Airlington, VA.
11. Franks, R.G., et al., 1995. A toolset for performance engineering and software design of client-server systems. Performance Evaluation 24 (1-2), 117-135.
12. Goettge, R.T., 1990. An expert system for performance engineering of time-critical software. Proceedings Computer Measurement Group Conference, Orlando, FL, pp. 313-320.
13. Götz, N., Herzog, U., Rettelbach, M., 1993. Multiprocessor and Distributed System Design: The Integration of Functional Specification and Performance Analysis using Stochastic Process Algebras. Proceedings of the Performance 93, Rome.
14. Grummit, A., 1991. A performance engineer's view of systems development and trials. Proceedings Computer Measurement Group Conference, Nashville, TN, pp. 455-463.
15. Hillston, J., 1992. A Tool to Enhance Model Exploitation. In: Pooley, R., Hillston, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International of Conference Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.
16. Jain, R., 1990. Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis. Wiley, New York.
17. Lor, K., Berry, D.M., 1991. Automatic synthesis of SARA design models from system requirements. IEEE Trans, on Software Eng. 17 (12), 1229-1240.
18. Menascè, D.A., Almeida, V.A.F., Dowdy, L.W., 1994. Capacity planning and Performance Modeling. PTR Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Molloy, M.K., 1994. Fundamentals of Performance Modeling. MacMillan.
19. Opdahl, A., Solvberg, A., 1992. Conceptual integration of information system and performance modeling. Proceedings Working Conference on Information System Concepts: Improving the Understanding.
20. Rolia, J.A., 1992. Predicting the Performance of Software Systems, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
21. Rolia, J.A., Servick, K.C., 1995. The Method of Layers. IEEE Trans, on Software Eng. 21 (8), 689-700.
22. Rumbaugh, J., et al., 1991. Object-Oriented Modeling and Design. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
23. Shen, V., et al., 1990. VERDI: A Visual Environment for Designing Distributed Systems, J. Parallel and Distributed Systems 18(6).
24. Smith, C.U., 1990. Performance Engineering of Software Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
25. Smith, C.U., 1991. Integrating new and "Used" modeling tools for performance engineering. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, Torino, Italy.
26. Smith, C.U., 1994. Definition of A Performance Model Interchange Format, Technical Report No. PES-1001-94, Performance Engineering Services, Santa Fe, NM.
27. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G., 1995a. Panel presentation: A performance model interchange format. In: Bause, F., Beilner, H. (Eds.), International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, Heidelberg, Germany, Universitat Dortmund, Germany.
28. Smith, C.U., Williams, L.G., 1995b. A performance model interchange format. In: Bause, F., Beilner, H. (Eds.), Performance Tools and Model Interchange Formats, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 581, D-44221 Dortmund, Germany, Universitat Dortmund, Informatik IV, pp. 67-85.
29. Smith, C.U., 1996. Designing high-performance distributed applications using software performance engineering: A tutorial, Proceedings of the Computer Measurement Group, San Diego, pp. 498-507.
30. Turner, M., Neuse, D., Goldgar, R., 1992. Simulating optimizes move to client/server applications. Proceedings Computer Measurement Group Conference, Reno, NV, pp. 805-814.
31. Valderruten, A., et al., 1992. Deriving Queueing Networks Performance Models from Annotated LOTOS Specifications. In: Pooley, R., Hillston, J. (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Modelling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, Edinburgh Press, pp. 167-178.
32. Williams, L.G., 1994. Definition of the Information Requirements for Software Performance Engineering, Technical Report No. SERM-021-94, Software Engineering Research, Boulder, CO.
33. Williams, L.G., Smith, C.U., 1995. Information requirements for software performance engineering. Proceedings 1995 International Conference on Modeling Techniques and Tools for Computer Performance Evaluation, Heidelburg, Germany, Springer.
34. Woodside, C.M., et al., 1995. The Stochastic Rendezvous Network Model for Performance of Synchronous Client-Server-like Distributed Software, IEEE Trans. Comput. 44(1), 20-34.