Perceptions of children during a police interrogation: Guilt, confessions, and interview fairness

Psychology, Crime and Law

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 201-223

  Redlich, Allison D ^a   Quas, Jodi A ^b   Ghetti, Simona ^c  

^a Policy Research Associates Inc   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Child suspects; Confessions; Perceptions; Police interrogation

Indexed keywords

EID: 47749147684     PISSN: 1068316X     EISSN: 14772744     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10683160701652542     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bornstein, B.H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75-91.
2. Bottoms, B.L. (1993). Individual differences in perceptions of child sexual assault victims. In G.S. Goodman & B.L. Bottoms (Eds), Child victims, child eyewitnesses: Understanding and improving children's eyewitness testimony (pp. 229-261). New York: Guilford.
3. Burn, S.M. (1996). The social psychology of gender. New York: McGraw Hill.
4. Cashmore, J., & Bussey, K. (1996). Judicial perceptions of child witness competence. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 313-334.
5. Crosby, C.A., Britner, P.A., Jodl, K.M., & Portwood, S.G. (1995). The juvenile death penalty and the Eight Amendment: An empirical investigation of societal consensus. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 245-261.
6. Drizin, S., & Colgan, B. (2004). Tales from the juvenile confession front: A guide to how standard police interrogation tactics can produce coerced and false confessions from juvenile suspects. In G.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 127-162). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
7. Drizin, S.A., & Leo, R.A. (2004). The problem of false confessions in the post-DNA world. North Carolina Law Review, 82, 891-1008.
8. Everington, C. & Fulero, S. (1999). Competence to confess: Measuring understanding and suggestibility of dependants with mental retardation. Mental Retardation, 37, 212-220.
9. Fagan, J., & Zimring, FE. (2000) (Eds). The changing borders of juvenile justice: Transfer of adolescents to the criminal court. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
10. Fiske, S.T., & Taylor, S.E. (1991). Social cognition, 2nd edn. New York: McGraw Hill.
11. Ghetti, S., & Redlich, A.D. (2001). Reactions to youth crime: Perceptions of accountability and competency. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 19, 33-52.
12. Goldstein, N., Condie, L., Kalbeitzer, R., Osman, D., Geier, J. (2003). Juvenile offenders' Miranda rights comprehension and self-reported likelihood of offering false confessions. Assessment, 10, 359-369.
13. Grisso, T. (1981). Juvenile's waiver of rights: Legal and psychological competence. New York: Plenum.
14. Grisso, T., Steinberg, L., Woolard, J., Cauffman, E., Scott, E., Graham, S. et al. (2003). Juveniles' competence to stand trial: A comparison of adolescents' and adults' capacities as trial defendants. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 333-363.
15. Gudjonsson, G.H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. Chichester: Wiley.
16. Gudjonsson, G.S. (1989). Compliance in an interrogative situation: A new scale. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 535-540.
17. Haegerich, T.M., & Bottoms, B.L. (2000). Empathy and jurors' decisions in patricide trials involving child sexual assault allegations. Law and Human Behavior, 24, 421-448.
18. Inbau, F.E., Reid, J.E., Buckley, J.P., & Jayne, B.C. (2001). Criminal interrogation and confessions, 4th edn. Gaithersburg, MD: Aspen Publishers.
19. Kassin, S.M. (2005). On the psychology of confessions: Does innocence put innocents at risk? American Psychologist, 60, 215-228.
20. Kassin, S.M. (1997). The psychology of confession evidence. American Psychologist, 52, 221-233.
21. Kassin, S.M., Goldstein, C.C., & Savitsky, K. (2003). Behavioral confirmation in the interrogation room: On the dangers of presuming guilt. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 187-203.
22. Kassin, S.M., & Gudjonsson, G.H. (2004). The psychology of confessions: A review of the literature and issues. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5, 33-67.
23. Kassin, S.M., & Kiechel, K.L. (1996). The social psychology of false confessions: Compliance, internalization, and confabulation. Psychological Science, 7, 125-128.
24. Kassin, S.M., & McNall, K.(1991). Police interrogations and confessions: Communicating promises and threats by pragmatic implication. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 233-251.
25. Kassin, S.M., & Norwick, R.J. (2004). Why people waive their Miranda rights: The power of innocence. Law and Human Behavior, 28, 211-221.
26. Kassin, S.M., & Sukel, H. (1997). Coerced confessions and the jury: An experimental test of the 'Harmless Error' rule. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 27-46.
27. Kassin, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1980). Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 10, 133-146.
28. Kassin, S.M., & Wrightsman, L.S. (1983). The construction and validation of a juror bias scale. Journal of Research in Personality, 17, 423-442.
29. Kovera, M.B., & Borgida, E. (1997). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse trials: The admissibility of psychological science. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 11, 105-129.
30. Lassiter, G.D. (2002). Illusory causation in the courtroom. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 204-208.
31. Lassiter, G.D., Beers, M.J., Geers, A.L., Handley, I.M., Munhall, P.J., & Weiland, P.E. (2002). Further evidence for a robust point-of-view bias in videotaped confessions. Current Psychology, 21, 265-288.
32. Lassiter, G.D., & Irvine, A.A. (1986). Videotaped confessions: The impact of camera point of view on judgments of coercion. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 268-276.
33. Lassiter, G.D., Slaw, R.D., Briggs, M.A., & Scanlan, C.R. (1992). The potential for bias in videotaped confessions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1838-1851.
34. Leo, R.A. (1996). Inside the interrogation room. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 86, 266-303.
35. Loftus, E.F. (1979). Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
36. McCormick, C.T. (1972). Handbook of the law of evidence, 2nd edn, St Paul, MN: West.
37. Meissner, C.A., & Kassin, S.M. (2004). 'You're guilty, so just confess!' Cognitive and behavioral confirmation biases in the interrogation room. In G.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 85-106). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
38. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York: Harper and Row.
39. Owen-Kostelnik, J., Reppucci, N.D., & Meyer, J.R. (2006). Testimony and interrogation of minors: Assumptions about maturity and morality. American Psychologist, 61, 286-304.
40. Quas, J.A., Thompson, W.C., & Clarke-Stewart, K.A. (2005). Do jurors know what isn't so about child witnesses. Law and Human Behavior, 29, 425-456.
41. Ratcliffe, H. (2004). Police step up taped interrogations. St Louis Post Dispatch, 12 June 2004.
42. Redlich, A.D. (2004). Mental illness, police interrogations, and the potential for false confession. Psychiatric Services, 55, 19-21.
43. Redlich, A.D., Ghetti, S., & Quas, J.A. (in press). Perceptions of children during a police interview: A comparison of suspects and alleged victims. Journal of Applied Psychology.
44. Redlich, A.D., & Goodman, G.S. (2003). Taking responsibility for an act not committed: The influence of age and suggestibility. Law and Human Behavior, 27, 141-156.
45. Redlich, A.D., Silverman, M., & Steiner, H. (2003). Factors affecting pre-adjudicative and adjudicative competence in juveniles and young adults. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 1-17.
46. Redlich, A.D., Silverman, M., Chen, J., & Steiner, H. (2004). The police interrogation of children and adolescents. In G.D. Lassiter (Ed.), Interrogations, confessions, and entrapment (pp. 107-126). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
47. Ridgeway, C.L. (2001). Gender, status, and leadership. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 637-655.
48. Rozas, A., & Howes, J. (2003). Two juries dubious over confession tapes' merit: They wanted interrogations included. Chicago Tribune, p. 1, August 17, 2003.
49. Saltzman, J. (2004). Acquittal stuns courthouse: Jury finds no 'joint venture' in killing of pregnant teen. The Boston Globe, Metro/Region, 30 April 2004.
50. Schmidt, C.W., & Brigham, J.C. (1996). Jurors' perceptions of child victim-witnesses in a simulated sexual abuse trial. Law and Human Behavior, 20, 581-606.
51. Schutte, J.W., & Hosch, H.M. (1997). Gender differences in sexual assault verdicts: A meta-analysis. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 759-772.
52. Sigurdsson, & Gudjonsson, G.S. (1996). The psychological characteristics of 'false confessors': A study among Icelandic prison inmates and juvenile offenders. Personality and Individual Differences, 20, 321-329.
53. Stalans, L., & Henry, G. (1994). Societal views of justice for adolescents accused of murder: Inconsistency between community sentiment and automatic legislative transfers. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 675-696.
54. Steinberg, L., & Cauffman, E. (2001). Adolescents as adults in court: A developmental perspective on the transfer of juveniles to criminal court. Social Policy Report, XV, 3-14.
55. Sullivan, T.P. (2004). Police experiences with recording custodial interrogations. Special report from the Northwestern University School of Law, Center on Wrongful Convictions.
56. Tang, C.M., & Nunez, N. (2003). Effects of defendant age and juror bias on judgment of culpability: What happens when a juvenile is tried as an adult? American Journal of Criminal Justice, 28, 37-52.
57. Warling, D., & Peterson-Badali, M. (2003). The verdict on jury trials for juveniles: The effects of defendant's age on trial outcomes. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 21, 63-82.