Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Trials: The Admissibility of Psychological Science

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 11, Issue 7, 1997, Pages

  Kovera, Margaret Bull ^a   Borgida, Eugene ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4143147437     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199712)11:73.0.co;2-%23     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Acker, J. R. (1990), Social science in Supreme Court criminal cases and beliefs: The actual and potential contribution of social scientists as amici curiae. Law and Human Behavior, 14, 25-42.
2. Berliner, L. and Conte, J. R. (1993). Sexual abuse evaluations: Conceptual and empirical obstacles. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 111-125.
3. Borgida, E., Gresham, A. W., Swim, J., Bull [Kovera], M. A. and Gray, E. (1989). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: An empirical investigation of partisan orientation. Family Law Quarterly, 23, 433-449.
4. Brekke, N. and Borgida, E. (1988). Expert psychological testimony in rape trials: A socialcognitive analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 372-386.
5. Ceci, S. J. and Bruck, M. (1993). Suggestibility of the child witness: A historical review and synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 403-439.
6. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A. and Eagly, A. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman and J. A. Bargh (Eds), Unintended thought (pp. 212-251). New York: Guilford Press.
7. Conte, J. R. (1993). Overview of child sexual abuse. Review of Psychiatry, 10, 283-307.
8. Corwin, D. L., Berliner, L., Goodman, G., Goodwin, J. and White, S. (1987). Child sexual abuse and custody disputes: No easy answers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 91-105.
9. Cutler, B. L., Dexter, H. R. and Penrod, S. D. (1989). Expert testimony and jury decision making: An empirical analysis. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 7, 215-225.
10. Cutler, B. L., Penrod, S. D. and Dexter, H. R. (1989). The eyewitness, the expert psychologist, and the jury. Law and Human Behavior, 13, 311-332.
11. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 113 S. Ct. 2786 (1993).
12. Dodge, M. and Greene, E. (1991). Jurors and expert conceptions of battered women. Victims and Violence, 6, 271-282.
13. Elliott, R. (1991). Social science data and the APA: the Lockhart brief as a case in point. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 59-76.
14. Faust, D. and Ziskin, J. (1 July 1988). The expert witness in psychology and psychiatry. Science, 241, 31-35.
15. Federal Rules of Evidence. United States Code. Title 28.
16. Finkelhor, D. (1979). Sexually victimized children. New York: The Free Press.
17. Finkelhor, D. (1984). Child sexual abuse: New theory and research. New York: The Free Press.
18. Finkelhor, D., Araji, S., Baron, L., Browne, A., Peters, S. D. and Wyatt, G. E. (1986). A sourcebook on child sexual abuse. Beverly Hills: Sage.
19. Fong, G. T., Krantz, D. H. and Nisbett, R. E. (1986). The effects of statistical training on thinking about everyday problems. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 253-292.
20. Frazier, P. A. and Borgida, E. (1988). Juror common understanding and the admissibility of rape trauma syndrome evidence in court. Law and Human Behavior, 12, 101-121.
21. Frazier, P. A. and Borgida, E. (1992). Rape trauma syndrome: A review of the case law and psychological research. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 293-311.
22. Frazier, P. A. and Borgida, E. (1997). Rape trauma syndrome. In D. L. Faigman, D. Kaye, M. J. Saks, and J. Sanders (Eds), Modern Scientific Evidence. St Paul, MN: West Publishing.
23. Frye v. United States, 54 App. D.C. 46. 293 F. 1013 (1923).
24. Goodman. G. S. (1991). On stress and accuracy in research on children's testimony. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 77-82). Washington. DC: American Psychological Association.
25. Goodman, G. S., Levine, M., Melton, G. B. and Ogden, D. W. (1991). Child witnesses and the confrontation clause: The American Psychological Association brief in Maryland v. Craig. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 13-30.
26. Green, A. H. (1986). True and false allegations of sexual abuse in child custody disputes. Journal of the American Academy of Child Psychiatry, 25, 449-456.
27. Greene, E., Raitz, A. and Lindblad, H. (1989). Jurors' knowledge of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 105-125.
28. Gresham, A., Borgida, E., Swim, J., French, S. and Bull [Kovera], M. (May 1989). Juror common understanding of child sexual abuse and children as witnesses. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicaco, Illinois.
29. Hall, M. D. (1989). The role of psychologists as experts in cases involving allegations of child sexual abuse. Family Law Quarterly, 23, 451-464.
30. Herbert, C. P. (1987). Expert medical assessment in determining probability of alleged child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 213-221.
31. Iacono, W. G. and Lykken, D. R. (1997). The validity of the lie detector. Two surveys of scientific opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 426-433.
32. Jepson, C., Krantz, D. H. and Nisbett, R. E. (1983). Inductive reasoning: Competence or skill? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6, 494-501.
33. Johnson, M. R. and Foley, M. A. (1984). Differentiating fact from fantasy: The reliability of children's memory. Journal of Social Issues, 40, 33-46.
34. Kassin, S. M., Ellsworth, P. C. and Smith, V. L. (1989). The 'general acceptance' of psychological research on eyewitness testimony: A survey of the experts. American Psychologist, 44, 1089-1098.
35. Kendall-Tackett, K. A. and Simon, A. F. (1987). Perpetrators and their acts: Data from 365 adults molested as children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 11, 237-245.
36. Kendall-Tackett, K. A., Williams, L. M. and Finkelhor, D. (1993). Impact of sexual abuse on children: A review and synthesis of recent empirical studies. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 164-180.
37. Kovera, M. B. and Borgida, E. (1992). Children on the witness stand: A persuasion analysis of jurors' perceptions. Paper presented at the meetings of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
38. Kovera, M. B. and Borgida, E. (in press). Expert scientific testimony on child witnesses in the age of Daubert. In S. J. Ceci and H. Hembrooke (Eds). What can (and should) an expert tell the court? The art, science, and ethics of being an expert witness. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39. Kovera, M. B., Borgida, E., Gresham, A. W., Swim, J. and Gray, E. (1993). Do child sexual abuse experts hold pro-child beliefs? A survey of the International Society for Traumatic Stress Studies. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 6, 383-404.
40. Kovera, M. B., Gresham, A. W., Borgida, E., Gray, E. and Regan, P. C. (1997). Does expert psychological testimony inform or influence juror decision making? A social cognitive analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 178-191.
41. Kovera, M. B., Levy, R. J., Borgida, E. and Penrod, S. D. (1994). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse cases: Effects of expert evidence type and cross-examination. Law and Human Behavior, 18, 653-674.
42. Kovera, M. B., McAuliff, B. D. and Hebert, K. S. (August 1997). Juror evaluations of expert evidence validity. Paper presented at the 105th annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Chicago.
43. Lehman, D. R., Lempert, R. O. and Nisbett, R. E. (1988). The effects of graduate training on reasoning: Formal discipline and thinking about everyday life events. American Psychologist, 42, 431-443.
44. Levy, R. J. (1989). Using 'scientific' testimony to prove child sexual abuse: The Dorsey & Witney professorship lecture. Family Law Quarterly, 23, 383-409.
45. Loftus, E. F. (1993). The reality of repressed memories. American Psychologist, 48, 518-537.
46. Maryland v. Craig, 497 US 836 (1990).
47. McCloskey, M. and Egeth, H. E. (1983). Eyewitness identification: What can a psychologist tell a jury? American Psychologist. 38, 550-563.
48. McCord, D. (1986). Expert psychological testimony about child complainants in sexual abuse prosecutions: A foray into the admissibility of novel psychological evidence. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 77, 1-68.
49. Mian, M., Wehrspann, W., Klajner-Diamond, H., LeBaron, D. and Winder, C. (1986). Review of 125 children 6 years of age and under who were sexually abused. Child Abuse and Neglect, 10, 223-229.
50. Morison, S. and Greene, E. (1992). Juror and expert knowledge of child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 595-613.
51. Myers, J. E. B. (1993). Expert testimony regarding child sexual abuse. Child Abuse and Neglect, 17, 175-185.
52. Myers, J. E. B. (1995). New era of scepticism regarding children's credibility. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 1, 387-398.
53. Myers, J. E. B., Bays, J., Becker, J., Berliner, L., Corwin, D. L. and Saywitz, K. J. (1989). Expert testimony in child sexual abuse litigation. Nebraska Law Review, 68, 1-145.
54. Nisbett, R. E., Fong, G. T., Lehman, D. R. and Cheng, P. W. (1987). Teaching reasoning. Science, 238, 625-631.
55. Parker, H. and Parker, S. (1986). Father-daughter sexual abuse: An emerging perspective. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 56, 531-547.
56. Penrod, S. D., Fulero, S. and Cutler, B. L. (1995). Expert psychological testimony and eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: The state of the law and the science. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 13, 229-259.
57. Peters, D. P. (1991). The influence of stress and arousal on the child witness. In J. Doris (Ed.), The suggestibility of children's recollections: Implications for eyewitness testimony (pp. 60-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
58. Ratneshwar, S. and Chaiken, S. (1991). Comprehension's role in persuasion: The case of its moderating effects on the persuasive impact of source cues. Journal of Consumer Research, 18, 52-62.
59. Roesch, R., Golding, S. L., Hans, V. P. and Repucci, N. D. (1991). Social science and the courts: The role of amicus curiae briefs. Law and Human Behavior, 15, 1-12.
60. Rudy, L. and Goodman, G. S. (1991). Effects of participation on children's reports: Implications for children's testimony. Developmental Psychology, 27, 527-538.
61. Russell, D. E. H. (1983). The incidence and prevalence of intrafamilial and extrafamilial sexual abuse of female children. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 133-146.
62. Saywitz, K. J., Goodman, G. S., Nicholas, E. and Moan, S. F. (1991). Children's memories of a physical examination involving genital touch: Implications for reports of child sexual abuse. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 59, 682-691.
63. Summit, R. C. (1983). The child sexual abuse accommodation syndrome. Child Abuse and Neglect, 7, 177-193.
64. Schuller, R. A. (1992). The impact of battered woman syndrome evidence on jury decision processes. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 597-620.
65. Tamarelli, A. W., Jr (1994). Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals: Pushing the limits of scientific reliability - The questionable wisdom of abandoning the peer review standard for admitting expert testimony. Vanderbilt Law Review, 47, 1175-1203.
66. Tobey, A. E. and Goodman, G. S. (1992). Children's eyewitness memory: Effects of participation and forensic context. Child Abuse and Neglect, 16, 779-296.
67. Underwager, R. and Wakefield, H. (1992). Poor psychology produces poor law. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 233-243.
68. Widom, C. S. (1989a). The cycle of violence. Science, 244, 160-166.
69. Widom, C. S. (1989b). Does violence beget violence? A critical examination of the literature. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 3-28.
70. Wells, G. (1984). How adequate is human intuition for judging eyewitness testimony? In G. Wells and E. Loftus (Eds), Eyewitness testimony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.