Diabetes in Europe: Role and contribution of primary care-position paper of the European Forum for Primary Care

Quality in Primary Care

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 197-207

  Maier, Manfred ^a   Knopp, Astrid ^b   Pusarning, Susanne ^c   Rurik, Imre ^d   Orozco Beltran, Domingo ^e   Yaman, Hakan ^f   van Eygen, Luk ^g  

^a Medical University of Vienna and Wiener Werkstaette for Suicide Research   (Austria)

^b Medical Quality Assurance   (Austria)

^c Semmelweis University ^*

^d SEMMELWEIS UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

^e MIGUEL HERNÁNDEZ UNIVERSITY   (Spain)

^f Department of Family Medicine   (Belgium)

^g GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ARTICLE; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; EUROPE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOLISTIC CARE; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MEDICAL INFORMATION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PREVALENCE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF CARE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STAFF TRAINING;

EID: 47749108629     PISSN: 14791072     EISSN: 14791064     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. de Grauw WJ, van de Lisdonk EH, van den Hoogen HJ and van Weel C. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in type 2 diabetic patients: a 22-year historical cohort study in Dutch general practice. Diabetic Medicine 1995;12:117-22.
2. de Grauw WJ, van de Lisdonk EH, Behr RR et al. The impact of type 2 diabetes mellitus on daily functioning. Family Practice 1999;16:133-9.
3. Silink M. United Nations Resolution 61/225 - what does it mean to the diabetes world? International Journal of Clinical Practice Supplement 2007;157:5-8.
4. International Diabetes Federation. Diabetes Atlas. IDF: Brussels, 2006.
5. World Health Organization. European Health Report 2002. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Publications, European Series, 2002.
6. (ÖDG) ÖD-G. Diabetes Mellitus - Leitlinien für die Praxis. Acta Medica Austriaca 2005;31:155-84.
7. American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes - 2008. Diabetes Care 2008;31(suppl 1):S12-54.
8. 1c in U.S. adolescents: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Diabetes Care 2001; 24:834-7.
9. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes, 2005;28:S4-36.
10. Wong KC and Wang Z. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus of Chinese populations in Mainland China, Hong Kong, and Taiwan. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2006;73:126-34.
11. Weijman I, Ros WJ, Rutten GE et al. Fatigue in employees with diabetes: its relation with work characteristics and diabetes related burden. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2003;60(suppl 1):i93-8.
12. Muller IS, de Grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH et al. Foot ulceration and lower limb amputation in type 2 diabetic patients in Dutch primary health care. Diabetes Care 2002;25:570-4.
13. Starfield B. New paradigms for quality in primary care. British Journal of General Practice 2001;51:303-9.
14. Shaughnessy AF and Slawson DC. Blowing the whistle on review articles. BMJ 2004;328:E280-2.
15. Winocour PH. Effective diabetes care: a need for realistic targets. BMJ 2002;324:1577-80.
16. Hirsch IB. The burden of diabetes (care). Diabetes Care 2003;26:1613-14.
17. Goyder EC, McNally PG, Drucquer M, Spiers N and Botha JL. Shifting of care for diabetes from secondary to primary care, 1990-5: review of general practices. BMJ 1998;316:1505-6.
18. Virally M, Blickle JF, Girard J et al. Type 2 diabetes mellitus: epidemiology, pathophysiology, unmet needs and therapeutical perspectives. Diabetes and Metabolism 2007;33:231-44.
19. Khunti K, Ganguli S and Lowy A. Inequalities in provision of systematic care for patients with diabetes. Family Practice 2001;18:27-32.
20. Khunti K, Ganguli S, Baker R and Lowy A. Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes. British Journal of General Practice 2001;51:356-60.
21. Cleveringa FG, Gorter KJ, van den Donk M, Pijman PL and Rutten GE. Task delegation and computerized decision support reduce coronary heart disease risk factors in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care. Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics 2007;9:473-81.
22. McBean AM, Jung K and Virnig BA. Improved care and outcomes among elderly medicare managed care beneficiaries with diabetes. American Journal of Managed Care 2005;11:213-22.
23. Jencks SF, Huff ED and Cuerdon T. Change in the quality of care delivered to Medicare beneficiaries, 1998-1999 to 2000-2001. Journal of the American Medical Association 2003;289:305-12.
24. Saaddine JB, Engelgau MM, Beckles GL et al. A diabetes report card for the United States: quality of care in the 1990s. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002;136:565-74.
25. Van Eygen L SP, Borgermans L and Feyen L and De Maeseneer J (eds). The Management of Chronic Care Conditions in Europe with Special Reference to Diabetes: the privotal role of primary care. Position Paper 2006. European Forum for Primary Care, 2006.
26. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH and Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. Journal of the American Medical Association 2002;288(14):1775-9.
27. Bodenheimer T, Wagner EH and Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness: the chronic care model, Part 2. Journal of the American Medical Association 2002;288:1909-14.
28. Rurik I. Primary care diabetes in Hungary. Primary Care Diabetes 2007;1:177-9.
29. Department of Health. National Service Framework for Diabetes: standards. London: Department of Health, 2001.
30. Valdes S, Botas P, Delgado E, Alvarez F and Cadorniga FD. Population-based incidence of type 2 diabetes in northern Spain: the Asturias Study. Diabetes Care 2007; 30:2258-63.
31. Valdes S, Rojo-Martinez G and Soriguer F. Evolution of prevalence of type 2 diabetes in adult Spanish population. Medicina Clinica 2007;129:352-5.
32. Jorgensen LG, Petersen PH, Heickendorff L et al. Glycemic control in diabetes in three Danish counties. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine 2005;43: 1366-72.
33. Gorter K, van Bruggen R, Stolk R et al. Overall quality of diabetes care in a defined geographic region: different sides of the same story. British Journal of General Practice 2008;58(550):339-45.
34. Edwards R, Burns JA, McElduff P, Young RJ and New JP. Variations in process and outcomes of diabetes care by socio-economic status in Salford, UK. Diabetologia 2003;46:750-9.
35. Satman I, Yilmaz T, Sengul A et al. Population-based study of diabetes and risk characteristics in Turkey: results of the Turkish diabetes epidemiology study (TURDEP). Diabetes Care 2002; 25:1551-6.
36. Janssen P, Gorter K, Stolk R and Rutten G. Low yield of population-based screening for Type 2 diabetes in the Netherlands: the ADDITION Netherlands study. Family Practice 2007;24:555-61.
37. Khunti K and Ganguli S. Who looks after people with diabetes: primary or secondary care? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 2000;93:183-6.
38. Nocon A, Rhodes PJ, Wright JP et al. Specialist general practitioners and diabetes clinics in primary care: a qualitative and descriptive evaluation. Diabetic Medicine 2004;21:32-8.
39. Dunkelberg S, Noack A, Sperber S et al. Disease Management Program for diabetes mellitus type 2: cooperation or resistance of the general practitioner. Gesundheitswesen 2006;68:26-31.
40. http://diabetes.therapie-aktiv.at/esvapps/page/ page.jsp?p_menuid=64393&p_pageid=232&p_id=4 (accessed 9 April 2008).
41. Funnel MM and Anderson RM. Patient empowerment. In: Snoek F and Skinner T (eds) Psychology in Diabetes Care. Wiley, 2005.
42. Stimson G WB. Going to see the Doctor. Consultation process in general practice. London/Boston: Routledge and Kegan, 1975.
43. Hansen LJ, Olivarius Nde F, Siersma V, Drivsholm T and Andersen JS. Individualised treatment goals in diabetes care. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 2004;22:71-7.
44. Wonca Europe. The European definition of general practice/family medicine. www.woncaeurope.org, 2002.
45. Van Dam H, Van der Horst F, Metsers I, Crebolder H and Van den Borne H. Obstacles in the management of type 2 diabetes: the perspectives of patients and experts. In: H van Dam (ed) Studies and Reflections on Type 2 Diabetes Care in General Practice. Personal Communication (Thesis Maastricht 2005).
46. Vermeire EHH, Rätsep A, Levasseur G et al. Obstacles to adherence in living with type-2 diabetes: an international qualitative study using meta-ethnography (Eurobstacle). Primary Care Diabetes 2007;1:25-33.
47. Anderson B and Funnell M. The Art of Empowerment. Stories and strategies for diabetes educations. 2nd edn., American Diabetes Association, 2005.
48. de Grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH, van de Lisdonk EH et al. Outcomes of audit-enhanced monitoring of patients with type 2 diabetes. Journal of Family Practice 2002; 51:459-64.
49. Goudswaard AN, Stolk RP, Zuithoff P and Rutten GE. Patient characteristics do not predict poor glycaemic control in type 2 diabetes patients treated in primary care. European Journal of Epidemiology 2004;19:541-5.
50. Horst-Schrivers ANA, van der Ubink-Veltmaat LJ, Horst ICC, van der Bilo HJG and Lambert J. Matige bloeddrukregulatie bij patiënten met diabetes mellitus type 2 in de eerste en tweede lijn. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2004;148:570-4.
51. Seddon ME, Marshall MN, Campbell SM and Roland MO. Systematic review of studies of quality of clinical care in general practice in the UK, Australia and New Zealand. Quality in Health Care 2001;10:152-8.
52. Khunti K, Gadsby R, Millett C, Majeed A and Davies M. Quality of diabetes care in the UK: comparison of published quality-of-care reports with results of the Quality and Outcomes Framework for Diabetes. Diabetic Medicine 2007;24:1436-41.
53. Orozco-Beltran D, Gil-Guillen VF, Quirce F et al. Control of diabetes and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care. The gap between guidelines and reality in Spain. International Journal of Clinical Practice 2007;61:909-15.
54. Varroud-Vial M, Charpentier G, Vaur L et al. Effects of clinical audit on the quality of care in patients with type 2 diabetes: results of the DIABEST pilot study. Diabetes and Metabolism 2001; 27:666-74.
55. http://diabetes.therapie-aktiv.at/esvapps/page/ page.jsp?p_pageid=232&p_menuid=64351&p_id=1 (accessed 9 April 2008).
56. www.diabetespas.be(accessed 9 April 2008).
57. Mendis K and Solangaarachchi I. PubMed perspective of family medicine research: where does it stand? Family Practice 2005;22:570-5.
58. De Maeseneer JM, van Driel ML, Green LA and van Weel C. The need for research in primary care. The Lancet 2003;362:1314-19.
59. Rutten G and Munro N. Promoting research in primary care. Primary Care Diabetes 2007;1:1-2.
60. Bensing JM, Tromp F, van Dulmen S et al. Shifts in doctor-patient communication between 1986 and 2002: a study of videotaped general practice consultations with hypertension patients. BMC Family Practice 2006;7:62.
61. Griffin S and Kinmonth AL. Diabetes care: the effectiveness of systems for routine surveillance for people with diabetes (Cochrane Review). The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2000.
62. Klein Woolthuis EP, de Grauw WJ, van Gerwen WH et al. Identifying people at risk for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes using the GP's electronic medical record. Family Practice 2007;24:230-6.