Task delegation and computerized decision support reduce coronary heart disease risk factors in type 2 diabetes patients in primary care

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 473-481

  Cleveringa, Frits G W ^a   Gorter, Kees J ^a   Van Den Donk, Maureen ^a   Pijman, Peter L W ^b   Rutten, Guy E H M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b Diagnosis 4 Health   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHOLESTEROL; HEMOGLOBIN A1C;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE; CARDIOVASCULAR RISK; CHOLESTEROL BLOOD LEVEL; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CORONARY RISK; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; DIABETES MELLITUS; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; GENERAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIC HEART DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NURSE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE;

AGED; AUTOMATIC DATA PROCESSING; BLOOD PRESSURE; CORONARY DISEASE; DELEGATION, PROFESSIONAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DIABETIC ANGIOPATHIES; ETHNIC GROUPS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 35348883842     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2007.0210     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Huxley R, Barzi F, Woodward M: Excess risk of fatal coronary heart disease associated with diabetes in men and women: meta-analysis of 37 prospective cohort studies. BMJ 2006;332:73-78.
2. Whiteley L, Padmanabhan S, Hole D, Isles C: Should diabetes be considered a coronary heart disease risk equivalent?: results from 25 years of follow-up in the Renfrew and Paisley survey. Diabetes Care 2005;28:1588-1593.
3. Dahlöf B, Sever PS, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers DG, Caulfield M, Collins R, Kjeldsen SE, Kristinsson A, McInnes GT, Mehlsen J, Nieminen M, O'Brien E, Ostergren J; ASCOT Investigators: Prevention of cardiovascular events with an antihypertensive regimen of amlodipine adding perindopril as required versus atenolol adding bendroflumethiazide as required, in the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial-Blood Pressure Lowering Arm (ASCOT-BPLA): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2005;366:895-906.
4. Costa J, Borges M, David C, Carneiro AV: Efficacy of lipid lowering drug treatment for diabetic and non-diabetic patients: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2006;332:1115-1124.
5. Gaede P, Vedel P, Larsen N, Jensen GV, Parving HH, Pedersen O: Multifactorial intervention and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2003;348:383-393.
6. Stevens RJ, Kothari V, Adler AI, Stratton IM: The UKPDS risk engine: a model for the risk of coronary heart disease in Type II diabetes (UKPDS 56). Clin Sci (Lond) 2001;101:671-679.
7. National Institute for Clinical Excellence: Clinical Guideline H. Management of Type 2 Diabetes - Management of Blood Pressure and Blood Lipids. London: National Health Service, 2002.
8. Song SH, Brown PM: Coronary heart disease risk assessment in diabetes mellitus: comparison of UKPDS risk engine with Framingham risk assessment function and its clinical implications. Diabet Med 2004;21:238-245.
9. Ubink-Veltmaat LJ, Bilo HJ, Groenier KH, Rischen RO, Meyboom-de Jong B: Shared care with task delegation to nurses for type 2 diabetes: prospective observational study. Neth J Med 2005;63:103-110.
10. Shah BR, Hux JE, Laupacis A, Zinman B, van Walraven C: Clinical inertia in response to inadequate glycemic control: do specialists differ from primary care physicians? Diabetes Care 2005;28:600-606.
11. Ostbye T, Yarnall KS, Krause KM, Pollak KI, Gradison M, Michener JL: Is there time for management of patients with chronic diseases in primary care? Ann Fam Med 2005;3:209-214.
12. Renders CM, Valk GD, Griffin S, Wagner EH, Eijk JT, Assendelft WJ: Interventions to improve the management of diabetes mellitus in primary care, outpatient and community settings. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2001;(1):CD001481.
13. Shojania KG, Ranji SR, McDonald KM, Grimshaw JM, Sundaram V, Rushakoff RJ, Owens DK: Effects of quality improvement strategies for type 2 diabetes on glycemic control: a meta-regression analysis. JAMA 2006;296:427-440.
14. Garg AX, Adhikari NK, McDonald H, Rosas-Arellano MP, Devereaux PJ, Beyene J, Sam J, Haynes RB: Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. JAMA 2005;293:1223-1238.
15. Montani S, Bellazzi R, Quaglini S, d'Annunzio G: Meta-analysis of the effect of the use of computer-based systems on the metabolic control of patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther 2001;3:347-356.
16. Meigs JB, Cagliero E, Dubey A, Murphy-Sheehy P, Gildesgame C, Chueh H, Barry MJ, Singer DE, Nathan DM: A controlled trial of web-based diabetes disease management: the MGH diabetes primary care improvement project. Diabetes Care 2003;26:750-757.
17. Montori VM, Dinneen SF, Gorman CA, Zimmerman BR, Rizza RA, Bjornsen SS, Green EM, Bryant SC, Smith SA; Translation Project Investigator Group: The impact of planned care and a diabetes electronic management system on community-based diabetes care: the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project. Diabetes Care 2002;25:1952-1957.
18. Hetlevik I, Holmen J, Kruger O, Kristensen P, Iversen H, Furuseth K: Implementing clinical guidelines in the treatment of diabetes mellitus in general practice. Evaluation of effort, process, and patient outcome related to implementation of a computer-based decision support system. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2000;16:210-227.
19. Rutten GEHM, Verhoeven S, Heine RJ, de Grauw WJC, Cromme PVM, Reenders K: NHG-standard Diabetes Mellitus type 2 (first revision). Huisarts Wet 1999;42:67-84.
20. Registratie beroepen gezondheidszorg: percentages huisartsen naar praktijkvorm. www.nivel.nl (accessed January 1, 2004).
21. Houweling ST, Kleefstra N, Meyboom-de Jong B, Bilo HJG: Diabetes specialist nurse-led intervention to treat and control glycaemic regulation, hypertension and hyperlipidemia in patients with diabetes mellitus Type 2: a randomised controlled trial [abstract]. Diabetologia 2004;47:A72.
22. Benjamin EM: Case study: glycemic control in the elderly: risks and benefits. Clin Diabetes 2002;20:118-121.
23. Lee JD, Morrissey JR, Patel V: Recalculation of cardiovascular risk score as a surrogate marker of change in clinical care of diabetes patients: the Alphabet POEM project (Practice Of Evidence-based Medicine). Curr Med Res Opin 2004;20:765-772.
24. Winocour PH: Effective diabetes care: a need for realistic targets. BMJ 2002;324:1577-1580.
25. Lehmann ED: Computerised decision-support tools in diabetes care: hurdles to implementation. Diabetes Technol Ther 2004;6:422-429.
26. Goudswaard AN, Lam K, Stolk RP, Rutten GE: Quality of recording of data from patients with type 2 diabetes is not a valid indicator of quality of care. A cross-sectional study. Fam Pract 2003;20:173-177.