Variations in process and outcomes of diabetes care by socio-economic status in Salford, UK

Diabetologia

Volumn 46, Issue 6, 2003, Pages 750-759

  Edwards, R ^a   Burns, J A ^b   McElduff, P ^a   Young, R J ^b   New, J P ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b HOPE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Diabetes mellitus; Information systems; Quality of care; Socio economic status; Structured care

Indexed keywords

ACETYLSALICYLIC ACID; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; ANTILIPEMIC AGENT; CHOLESTEROL; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; INSULIN; ORAL ANTIDIABETIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETIC ANGIOPATHY; DIABETIC HYPERTENSION; DIABETIC MICROANGIOPATHY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEMOGLOBIN DETERMINATION; HUMAN; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LIPID ANALYSIS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT MONITORING; PRESCRIPTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPHYLAXIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIAL STATUS; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; URBAN AREA;

ADULT; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; ENGLAND; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS; HISTORY, 17TH CENTURY; HUMANS; MALE; MEDICAL RECORDS; MIDDLE AGED; POVERTY; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URBAN POPULATION;

EID: 0038235855     PISSN: 0012186X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-003-1102-z     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Chaturvedi N, Stephenson JM, Fuller JH (1996) The relationship between socioeconomic status and diabetes control and complications in the EURODIAB IDDM complications study. Diabetes Care 19:423-430
2. Chaturvedi N, Jarrett J, Shipley MJ et al. (1998) Socioeconomic gradient in morbidity and mortality in people with diabetes: cohort study findings from the Whitehall Study and the WHO Multinational Study of Vascular Disease in Diabetes. BMJ 316:100-105
3. Connolly VM, Kesson CM (1996) Socioeconomic status and clustering of cardiovascular disease risk factors in diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 19:419-422
4. Unwin N, Binns D, Elliott K et al. (1996) The relationships between cardiovascular risk factors and socio-economic status in people with diabetes. Diabet Med 13:72-79
5. Mülhauser I, Overmann H, Bender R et al. (1998) Social status and the quality of care for adult people with Type I (insulin dependent) diabetes mellitus - a population-based study. Diabetologia41:1139-1150
6. Nilsson PM, Johansson S-E, Sundquist J (1997) Low educational status is a risk factor for mortality among diabetic people. Diabet Med 15:213-219
7. Roper NA, Bilous RW, Kelly WF et al. (2001) Excess mortality in a population with diabetes and the impact of material deprivation: longitudinal, population based study. BMJ 322:1389-1393
8. Koskinen SV, Martelin TP, Valkonen T (1996) Socioeconomic differences in mortality among diabetic people in Finland: five year follow up. BMJ 313:975-978
9. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group (1993) The Effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Eng J Med 329:979-985
10. Kelly WF, Mahmood R, Turner S et al. (1994) Geographical mapping of diabetic patients from the deprived inner city show less insulin therapy and more hyperglycaemia. Diabet Med 11:344-348
11. Pringle M, Stewart-Evans C, Coupland C et al.. (1993). Influences on control in diabetes mellitus: patient, doctor, practice, or delivery of care? BMJ 306:630-634
12. Hart JT (1971). The inverse care law. Lancet 1:405-412
13. Leese B, Bosanquet N (1995). Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. BMJ 311:546-550
14. Khunti K, Ganguli S, Lowy A (2001) Inequalities in provision of systematic care for patients with diabetes. Fam Pract 18:27-32
15. Khunti K, Ganguli S, Baker R et al. (2001) Features of primary care associated with variations in process and outcome of care of people with diabetes care. Br J Gen Pract 51:356-360
16. Campbell SM, Hann M, Hacker J et al. (2001) Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study. BMJ 323:784-787
17. North West Public Health Observatory (accessed on 10-09-2002). Information sources; http://www.nwpho.org.uk/information/
18. New JP, Hollis S, Campbell F et al. (2000) Measuring clinical performance and outcomes from diabetes information systems: an observational study. Diabetologia 43:836-843
19. Vaughan NJ, Home PD (1995) The UK Diabetes Dataset: a standard for information exchange. Diabetes Audit Working Group of the Research Unit of the Royal College of Physicians. British Diabetic Association. Diabet Med 12:717-722
20. New JP, Burns JA, Hollis S, Bennett J, Young RY (2002) Improving ascertainment rates for macrovascular disease within Electronic Diabetes Records using data linkage. Diabet Med 19 [Supp 2]:218
21. Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A, Helm C (1988) Health and deprivation: inequality and the North. Croom: Helm, London
22. Ramsay L E, Williams B, Johnston GD et al. (2000) British Hypertension Society guidelines for hypertension management 1999: summary. BMJ 319:630-635
23. Diggle PJ, Liang KY, Zeger SL. (1994) Analysis of longitudinal data. Oxford University Press, Oxford
24. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998). Tight blood pressure control and risk of macrovascular and microvascular complications in type 2 diabetes: (UKPDS 38). BMJ 317:703-713
25. UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group (1998) Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risks of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet 352:837-854