Offering choice in benefits: A new Dutch HRM arrangement

International Journal of Manpower

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 304-322

  Hillebrink, Carlien ^a   Schippers, Joop ^b   Van Doorne Huiskes, Anneke ^b   Peters, Pascale ^c  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Flexible benefits; Human resource management; Organizational change; The Netherlands

Indexed keywords

EID: 47249129871     PISSN: 01437720     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/01437720810884737     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Baaijens, C. (2006), “Arbeidstijden: tussen wens en werkelijkheid”, PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
2. Baron, J.N. and Kreps, D.M. (1999), Strategic Human Resources, Frameworks for General Managers, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY.
3. Barringer, M.W. and Milkovich, G.T. (1998), “A theoretical exploration of the adoption and design of flexible benefits plans, a case of human resource innovation”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 305-25.
4. Benders, J., Delsen, L. and Smits, J. (2006), “Bikes versus lease cars, the use of cafeteria systems in The Netherlands”, International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 17 No. 6, pp. 1115-28.
5. Delsen, L., Benders, J. and Smits, J. (2006), “Choices within collective labour agreements à la carte in The Netherlands”, British Journal of Industrial Relations, Vol. 44 No. 1, pp. 51-72.
6. den Dulk, L. (2001), Work-Family Arrangements in Organisations; a Crossnational Study in The Netherlands, Italy, the United Kingdom and Sweden, Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam.
7. DiMaggio, P.J. and Powell, W.W. (1983), “The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 48 No. 2, pp. 147-60.
8. Goodstein, J.D. (1994), “Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 350-82.
9. Hewitt, Heijnis en Koelman (2003), Resultaten Flex-survey, Flexibele Employee Benefits 2003, Hewitt, Heijnis en Koelman, Amsterdam.
10. Hillebrink, C. (2006), Flexible Benefits in Dutch Organisations, Ridderprint, Ridderkerk.
11. Hillebrink, C., Schippers, J.J. and van Stigt, J. (2004), Keuzes in Arbeidsvoorwaarden; een Onderzoek onder Leden van FNV Bondgenoten naar CAO à la Carte, FNV Bondgenoten, Utrecht.
12. Ingram, P. and Simons, T. (1995), “Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1466-82.
13. Kirton, G. and Greene, A.M. (2005), The Dynamics of Managing Diversity, a Critical Approach, 2nd ed, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.
14. Konrad, A.M., Prasad, P. and Pringle, J.K. (2006), Handbook of Workplace Diversity, Sage, London.
15. Korteweg, J.A.C., Tijdens, K.G. and de Winter, J.M. (2003), Keuzemogelijkheden in CAO's, Wat is het de Werknemer Waard?, OSA, Tilburg.
16. Kuiper, R. (2004), “De 25 Beste Werkgevers, Profit en Non-profit – December 2004”, Intermediar, Vol. 40 No. 53, pp. 34-41.
17. Langedijk, M.C. (2001), Flexibel Belonen: De Keuze voor Arbeidsvoorwaarden op Maat, Koninklijke van Gorcum, Assen.
18. Laursen, K. and Mahnke, V. (2001), “Knowledge strategies, firm types, and complementarity in human-resource practices”, Journal of Management and Governance, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 1-27.
19. Meyer, J.W. and Rowan, B. (1977), “Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 83 No. 2, pp. 340-63.
20. Oliver, C. (1991), “Strategic responses to institutional processes”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 145-79.
21. Peters, P. and Batenburg, R. (2004), “De keuze van organisaties voor thuiswerken en formeel thuiswerkbeleid”, Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken, Vol. 20, pp. 32-45.
22. Remery, C. (1998), Effecten van Emancipatiegericht Personeelsbeleid, Ridderprint, Ridderkerk.
23. Remery, C., Schippers, J. and Doorne-Huiskes, A. (2003), “van Family-friendly policies in The Netherlands: the tripartite involvement”, Personnel Review, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 456-73.
24. Schrama, J.J.H. and van den Ameele, A.N. (2004), Arbeid en Zorg in CAO's 2003, SZW, Den Haag.
25. Scott, W.R. (2001), Institutions and Organizations, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
26. Staatscourant (2000), “Staatscourant Wet van 30 November 2000 tot Wijziging van Titel 7.10 (Arbeidsovereenkomst) van het Burgerlijk Wetboek met Betrekking tot Vakantie en Ouderschapsverlof”, Nos 2000/545, pp. 1-5.
27. StvA (1999), Naar Arbeidsvoorwaarden op Maat, Stichting van de Arbeid, Den Haag.
28. StvA (2004), De CAO: Wat en Hoe, Stichting van de Arbeid, Den Haag.
29. Tolbert, P.S. and Zucker, L.G. (1983), “Institutional sources of change in the formal structure of organisations: the diffusion of civil service reform, 1880-1935”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 22-39.
30. van der Burg, B.I., van Doorne-Huiskes, A., Schippers, J.J. and Siegers, J.J. (1989), “Loopbaanverschillen tussen Mannen en Vrouwen binnen Arbeidsorganisaties, een Structureel-individualistisch Verklaringsschema”, Sociologische Gids, Vol. 36, pp. 312-23.
31. van Drongelen, J. (2002), Teksten en Toelichting op de Wet Arbeid en Zorg, SDU Uitgevers, Den Haag.
32. van Sas, E. (forthcoming), “Decentralisatie en Individualisering in CAOs”, PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
33. van Sloten, G.C., Nauta, A. and Oeij, P.R.A. (2005), Arbeidsvoorwaarden en arbeidsverhoudingen op ondernemingsniveau; AVON monitor 2004, TNO Arbeid, Hoofddorp.