Family-friendly policies in the Netherlands: The tripartite involvement

Personnel Review

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2003, Pages

  Remery, Chantal ^a   Van Doorne Huiskes, Anneke ^a   Schippers, Joop ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Employment; Family friendly organizations; Policy; Service industries; The Netherlands; Work

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038204448     PISSN: 00483486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00483480310477533     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Brewster, C., Hegewisch, A., Mayne, L. and Tregaskis, O. (1994), "Methodology of the Price Waterhouse Cranfield Project", in Brewster, C. and Hegewisch, A. (Eds), Policy and Practice in European Human Resource Management, Routledge, London, pp. 230-45.
2. den Dulk, I. (2001), Work Family Arrangements in Organisations, Rozenberg Publishers, Amsterdam.
3. Dex, S. and Scheibl, F. (1999), "Business performance and family friendly policies", Journal of General Management, Vol. 24 No. 4, pp. 22-37.
4. Franco, A. and Winqvist, K. (2002), "Women and men reconciling work and family life", Statistics in Focus, Vol. 3 No. 9.
5. Glass, J. and Fujimoto, T. (1995), "Employer characteristics and the provision of family responsive policies", Work and Occupations, Vol. 22 No. 4, pp. 380-411.
6. Goodstein, J.D. (1994), "Institutional pressures and strategic responsiveness: employer involvement in work-family issues", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 350-82.
7. Grootscholte, M., Bouwmeester, J.A. and de Klaver, P. (2000), Evaluatie Wet op het ouderschapsverlof. Onderzoek onder rechthebbenden en werkgevers. Eindrapport, Elsevier Bedrijfsinformatie, Den Haag.
8. Hemerijck, A.C. and Visser, J. (1997), "A Dutch Miracle": Job Growth, Welfare Reform and Corporatism in The Netherlands, Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam.
9. Holterman, S. (1995), "The costs and benefits to British employers of measures to promote equal opportunity", in Humphries, J. and Rubery, J. (Eds), The Economics of Equal Opportunities, Equal Opportunities Commission, Manchester, pp. 137-54.
10. Ingram, P. and Simons, T. (1995), "Institutional and resource dependence determinants of responsiveness to work-family issues", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1466-82.
11. Kalleberg, A.L., Knoke, D., Marsden, P. and Spaeth, J. (1996), Organizations in America: Analyzing Their Structures and Human Resource Practices, Sage, London.
12. Kossek, E.E., Dass, P. and DeMarr, B. (1994), "The dominant logic of employer-sponsored work and family initiatives: human resource managers' institutional role", Human Relations, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 1121-49.
13. Lewis, S. (1996), "Rethinking employment: an organizational culture change framework", in Lewis, S. and Lewis, J. (Eds), The Work-Family Challenge, Sage Publications, London.
14. Milliken, F.J., Martins, L.L. and Morgan, H. (1998), "Explaining organizational responsiveness to work-family issues: the role of human resource executives as issue interpreters", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 41 No. 5, pp. 580-92.
15. OECD (2001), "Balancing work and family life: helping parents into paid employment" in Employment Outlook 2001, OECD, Paris, pp. 129-66.
16. Oliver, C. (1991), "Strategic responses to institutional processes", Academy of Management Review, Vol. 16, pp. 145-79.
17. SGBO (2001), Kinderopvang in gemeenten. De monitor over 1999, SGBO, Den Haag.
18. Staatsblad (2001), Wet Arbeid en Zorg (Statute Book of The Netherlands), No. 625/644.
19. Teulings, C.N. and Hartog, J. (1998), Corporatism and Competition, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.