A general strategy for construction of both 2,6-cis- and 2,6-trans-disubstituted tetrahydropyrans: Substrate-controlled asymmetric total synthesis of (+)-scanlonenyne

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 47, Issue 22, 2008, Pages 4200-4203

  Lee, Hyunjoo ^a   Kim, Kwan Woo ^a   Park, Janghyun ^a   Kim, Hyoungsu ^a   Kim, Sanghee ^a   Kim, Deukjoon ^a   Hu, Xiangqian ^b   Yang, Weitao ^b   Hong, Jiyong ^b  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetric synthesis; Bromination; Michael addition; Natural products; Tetrahydropyrans

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL REACTIONS; KETONES; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; ORGANIC COMPOUNDS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ASYMMETRIC SYNTHESIS; BROMINATION; MICHAEL ADDITION; NATURAL PRODUCTS; TETRAHYDROPYRANS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

ALKYNE; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCT; PYRAN DERIVATIVE; SCANLONENYNE;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; LAURENCIA; STEREOISOMERISM; SYNTHESIS;

ALKYNES; BIOLOGICAL PRODUCTS; LAURENCIA; PYRANS; STEREOISOMERISM;

EID: 47049118956     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.200705663     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. For reviews, see: a) T. L. B. Boivin, Tetrahedron 1987, 43, 3309-3362;
2. b) R. D. Norcross, I. Paterson, Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 2041-2114;
3. c) E. J. Kang, E. Lee, Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 4348-4378;
4. d) P. A. Clarke, S. Santos, Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2006, 2045-2053.
5. a) For a lead reference concerning syntheses of 2,6-disubstituted tetrahydropyrans, see: N. Kawai, J.-M. Lagrange, M. Ohmi, J. Uenishi, J. Org. Chem. 2006, 71, 4530-4537;
6. b) H. G. Lee, I. L. Lysenko, J. K. Cha, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 3390-3392;
7. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 3326-3328.
8. For an example of an intramolecular hetero-Michael addition to a hydroxybutenolide for construction of a pyrano-γ-lactone, see: G. A. Kraus, B. Roth, J. Org. Chem. 1978, 43, 4923-4924.
9. M. Suzuki, Y. Takahashi, Y. Matsuo, M. D. Guiry, M. Masuda, Tetrahedron 1997, 53, 4271-4278.
10. a) H. M. Sheldrake, C. Jamieson, J. W. Burton, Angew. Chem. 2006, 118, 7357-7360;
11. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2006, 45, 7199-7202, and references therein;
12. b) J. Park, B. Kim, H. Kim, S. Kim, D. Kim, Angew. Chem. 2007, 119, 4810-4812;
13. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 4726-4728.
14. a) J. W. Burton, J. S. Clark, S. Derrer, T. S. Stork, J. G. Bendall, A. G. Holmes, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1997, 119, 7483-7498;
15. b) M. T. Crimmins, E. A. Tabet, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 5473-5476.
16. D. A. Evans, J. Bartroli, T. L. Shih, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1981, 103, 2127-2129.
17. T. K. Jones, S. G. Mills, R. A. Reamer, D. Askin, R. Desmond, R. P. Volante, I. Shinkai, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1989, 111, 1157-1159.
18. For reviews of the Wacker oxidation, see: a) J. Tsuji, Synthesis 1984, 369-384;
19. b) J. M. Takacs, X.-T. Jiang, Curr. Org. Chem. 2003, 7, 369-396.
20. For the aldehyde-selective Wacker oxidation of allylic diol derivatives, see: S.-K. Kang, K.-Y. Jung, J.-U. Chung, E.-Y. Namkoong, T.-H. Kim, J. Org. Chem. 1995, 60, 4678-4679.
21. It is interesting to note that the Wacker oxidation of the C12/C13-anti isomer under comparable conditions gave the corresponding ketone as the major regioisomer; see the Supporting Information.
22. Y. Oikawa, T. Yochika, O. Yonemitsu, Tetrahedron Lett. 1982, 23, 885-888.
23. CCDC-656345 (for 2), CCDC-667564 (for ent-3a), and CCDC-656346 (for 4b) contain the supplementary crystallographic data for this paper. These data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif; see also the Supporting Information.
24. -1, respectively.
25. a) Separation of the 10R and 10S isomers and subjection of each isomer to the IHMA conditions gave roughly the same result. b) The minor α,α′-cis isomer 3b did not equilibrate to the corresponding trans isomer 3a under the reaction conditions.
26. Independently synthesized 3′a equilibrated completely to 3′b after 80 h under the reaction conditions (≈ 30% after 24 h).
27. a) F. Ramirez, N. B. Desai, N. McKelvie, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1962, 84, 1745-1747;
28. b) E. J. Corey, P. L. Fuchs, Tetrahedron Lett. 1972, 13, 3769-3772.
29. W. M. Pearlman, Tetrahedron Lett. 1967, 8, 1663-1664.
30. a) R. Ratcliffe, R. Rodehorst, J. Org. Chem. 1970, 35, 4000-4002;
31. b) R. Mahrwald, F. Theil, H. Schick, H.-J. Palme, H. Nowak, G. Weber, S. Schwarz, Synthesis 1987, 1012-1013, and references therein;
32. c) J. Muzart, Synthesis 1993, 11-27.
33. 2 bromination of C13-ethyl, -vinyl, -(Z)-1-bromovinyl, -(E)-1-bromovinyl, and -1,1-dibromovinyl groups were 17, 13, 53, 10, and 77%, respectively.
34. a) L. Horner, H. Oediger, H. Hoffmann, Justus Liebigs Ann. Chem. 1959, 626, 26-34;
35. b) S. P. Schmidt, D. W. Brooks, Tetrahedron Lett. 1987, 28, 767-768.
36. a) A. Basha, M. Lipton, S. M. Weinreb, Tetrahedron Lett. 1977, 18, 4171-4172;
37. b) T. Shimizu, K. Osako, T. Nakata, Tetrahedron Lett. 1997, 38, 2685-2688, and references therein.
38. a) S. Nahm, S. M. Weinreb, Tetrahedron Lett. 1981, 22, 3815-3818;
39. b) protection of the hydroxy group at the C10 position was critical for the success of the Weinreb ketone synthesis.
40. H. Kim, H. Lee, D. Lee, S. Kim, D. Kim, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 2269-2274, and references therein.