Can there be science-based precaution?

Environmental Research Letters

Volumn 1, Issue 1, 2006, Pages

  Weiss, Charles ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive management; Attitude toward risk; Cost benefit; Genetically modified crops; Legal principle; Precaution; Reasonable belief; Risk management; Science based; Standard of proof; Trade law; Utility function

Indexed keywords

CROPS; INTERNATIONAL LAW; INTERNATIONAL TRADE;

ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT; COST/BENEFIT; GENETICALLY MODIFIED CROPS; LEGAL PRINCIPLES; PRECAUTION; REASONABLE BELIEF; SCIENCE-BASED; UTILITY FUNCTIONS;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33846621027     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17489326     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/1/1/014003     Document Type: Review

References (40)

1. Harramoes P et al (ed) 2002 The Precautionary Principle in the 20th Century: Late Lessons from Early Warnings (London: Earthscan Publications)
2. Miller H I and Conko G 2001 The perils of precaution Policy Review 25-39 (Reprinted in Easton T A 2005 Taking Sides: Clashing Views on Controversial Environmental Issues 11th edn (Dubuque, IA: McGraw-Hill) pp 9-20)
3. Graham J D 2004 The perils of the precautionary principle: lessons from the American and European experience The Heritage Foundation Lecture #818 http://www.heritage.org/Research/Regulation/hl818.cfm (accessed 2/5/06)
4. World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body 2006 European Communities - measures affecting the approval and marketing of biotech products WT/DS291, WT/DS292, WT/DS293 available at http://www.wto.org/english/news_e/ news06_e/291r_e.htm
5. Weiss C 2003 Scientific uncertainty and science-based precaution Int. Environ. Agreements: Politics, Law Econ. 3 137-66
6. See also Weiner J 2002 Precaution in a multi-risk world Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: Theory and Practice ed P Dennis (Wiley: New York)
7. Commission of the European Communities 2000 Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle http://ec.europa.eu/comm/dgs/ health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf (accessed 22/5/06)
8. Michaels D and Celeste M 2005 Manufacturing uncertainty: contested science and the protection of the public's health and environment Am. J. Public Health 95 S39-48
9. Neff R A and Lynn R G 2005 Regulatory parallels to Daubert: Stakeholder influence, 'sound science' and the delayed adoption of health-protective standards Am. J. Public Health 95 S81-91
10. David M 2005 Doubt is their product: industry groups are fighting government regulation by fomenting scientific uncertainty Sci. Am. available at http://www.powerlinefacts.com/Sciam_article_on_lobbying.htm (accessed 22/5/06)
11. Michaels D and Celeste M 2005 Scientific evidence in the regulatory system: manufacturing uncertainty and the demise of the formal regulatory system J. Law Policy 12 (1) (accessed 22/5/06)
12. Maienschein J 2003 Whose View of Life: Embryos, Cloning and Stem Cells (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press) pp 228-9
13. Schioler E 2001 Seeds of Contention (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Press)
14. Delincée H 2003 Statement to 'Irradiated Food in School Lunches', a Packet Published by Public Citizen (Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota Beef Council) http://www.mnbeef.org/statement_to%20public%20citizen.delincee.htm
15. But see Public Citizen Why is the FDA Ignoring Toxic Chemicals in Irradiated Food? Washington, DC: 1600 20th Street, NW, 20009. http://www.citizen.org/cmep/foodsafety/food_irrad/artic les.cfm?ID = 12342 (both accessed 17/3/06)
16. 2003 Precaution, Environmental Science and Preventive Public Policy J Tickner (ed) (Washington, DC: Island Press)
17. World Commission on the Ethics of Scientific Knowledge and Technology 2005 The Precautionary Principle vol 7 (Paris: United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization) p 14 http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/ 0013/001395/139578e.pdf (accessed 22/5/06)
18. Lee K N 1993 Compass and Gyroscope (Washington, DC: Island Press) p 58
19. See also Lee K N 1993 Appraising adaptive management Conserv. Ecol. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol3/iss2/art3/ (accessed 22/5/06)
20. Weiss C 2006 Precaution: the willingness to accept costs to avert uncertain danger Coping with Uncertainty: Modeling and Policy Issues ed K Marti, Y Ermolev, M Markowski and G Pflug (Berlin: Springer) pp 315-30 (Revised from the article by Weiss in [4])
21. Mahlman J D 1998 Science and non-science concerning human-caused climate warming Ann. Rev. Energy Environ. 23 83-105
22. Inter-Governmental Panel on Climate Change 2001 Report of Working Group I http://www.ipcc.ch/pub/spm22-01.pdf (accessed 22/5/06)
23. See also Mahlman J D 1997 Uncertainties in projections of human-caused global climate warming Science 278 1416-7
24. Weiss C 2003 Expressing scientific uncertainty Law Probab. Risk 2 25-46
25. Weiss E B et al 1999 Rio Declaration on Environment and Development 1992 International Environmental Law: Basic Instruments and References, 1992-1999 (Ardsley, NY: Transnational Press) Principle 15, p 24
26. Second International Conference on the Protection of the North Sea (November 1987) 1988 Ministerial Calling for Reduction of Pollution vol 27 (London: International Legal Materials) p 835 available at http://www.odin.no/ md/nsc/declaration/022001-990245/dok-bn.html (accessed 22/5/06)
27. Marchant G E and Mossman K L 2004 Arbitrary and Capricious: The Precautionary Principle in the European Union Courts (Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute Press)
28. See also Sand P 1994 The greening of international law: emerging principles and rules Global Legal Studies J. 1 293-323
29. Treaty of the European Union, Official Journal, 1997, C340 11, (Consolidated Version), Title II, Article 174, Clause 2
30. Commission of the European Communities 2000 Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle available at http://ec.europa.eu/comm/ dgs/health_consumer/library/pub/pub07_en.pdf (accessed 22/5/06)
31. Sand P 1994 The greening of international law: Emerging principles and rules Global Legal Studies J. 1 293-323
32. Raffensperger C 2003 US vs 'Old Europe' on Biotechnology (Washington, DC: The Environmental Law Institute) The Environmental Forum available at http://www.sehn.org/pdf/july-aug2003.pdf (accessed 22/5/06)
33. World Trade Organization Appellate Body, EC Measures Concerning Meat and Meat Products (Hormones), WT/DS26/AB/R and WT/DS48/AB/R
34. Agreement Establishing WTO 1993 Annex IA: Multilateral Agreements on Trade and Goods, Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures, GATT Doc. MTN/FA
35. Schwartz B 1991 Administrative Law 3rd edn (Boston, MA: Little Brown)
36. Terry v Ohio 1968 392 US 1 summary available at http://www.answers.com/ topic/terry-v-ohio (accessed 22/5/06)
37. Resnik D B 2003 Is the precautionary principle unscientific? Stud. Philos. Biol. Biomed. Sci. 34 329-44
38. World Trade Organization Dispute Settlement Body 2003 European Communities: measures affecting the approval and marketing biotech products EU Dispute DS291
39. Carter M D 1997 Selling science under the SPS agreement: accommodating consumer preference in the growth hormone controversy Minn. J., Global Trade 6 625-56
40. US Food and Drug Administration 1996 Food Quality Protection Act, Title IV, Amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, Section 408, b, 2, a, ii and Section 408, b, 2, C, ii, I, and Section 408, C, 2, ii, http://www.fda.gov/opacom/laws/foodqual/fqpa4.htm (accessed 22/5/06)