Trends in ICT standards: The relationship between European standardisation bodies and standards consortia

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 503-513

  Blind, Knut ^a,b,c   Gauch, Stephan ^b  

^a TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER INSTITUTE FOR SYSTEMS AND INNOVATION RESEARCH ISI   (Germany)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Formal standardisation; Information and telecommunication technology; Standardisation; Standardisation consortia

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER NETWORKS; ELECTRIC NETWORK ANALYSIS; INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; LABELING; PUBLIC POLICY; STANDARDIZATION; STANDARDS; TECHNOLOGY;

(R ,S ,S) POLICY; CASE STUDIES; ELSEVIER (CO); EMPIRICAL EVIDENCES; EUROPEAN; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY (ITC); PUBLIC PROCUREMENT; QUANTITATIVE APPROACHES; SIGNIFICANT REDUCTION; TECHNICAL CONTENT; TECHNICAL FIELDS; TECHNICAL ISSUES; TECHNICAL REGULATIONS;

LABELS;

EID: 46749087775     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.telpol.2008.05.004     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Belleflamme P. Coordination on formal vs. de facto standards: A dynamic approach. European Journal of Political Economy 18 1 (2002) 153-176
2. Berners-Lee T. Weaving the web: The original design and ultimate destiny of the world wide web (2000), Harper Business, New York
3. Blind K. The economics of standards: Theory, evidence, policy (2004), Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
4. Blind K., and Thumm N. Interaction between patenting and standardisation strategies: Empirical evidence and policy implications. Research Policy 33 (2004) 1583-1598
5. Blum U., Töpfer A., Eickhoff G., and Junginger I. Gesamtwirtschaftlicher Nutzen der Normung: Unternehmerischer Nutzen. 2 Bände ed (2000), Beuth-Verlag, Berlin
6. David P.A. Formal standard-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Telecommunications Policy 20 (1996) 789-815
7. David P.A., and Shurmer M. Formal standards-setting for global telecommunications and information services. Telecommunications Policy 20 (1996) 789-815
8. European Commission. (2007). In preparation of the future commission communication towards an increased contribution from standardisation to innovation in Europe. Discussion paper ENTR/I3/JA D (2007). Brussels.
9. Farrell J., and Saloner G. Coordination through committees and markets. Rand Journal of Economics 16 (1988) 70-83
10. Funk J.L., and Methe D.T. Market- and committee-based mechanisms in the creation and diffusion of global industry standards: the case of mobile communication. Research Policy 30 (2001) 589-610
11. Haug T. A commentary on standardization practices: lessons from the NMT and GSM mobile standards histories. Telecommunications Policy 26 (2002) 101-107
12. Hawkins R. The rise of consortia in the information and communication industries: emerging implications for policy. Telecommunication Policy 23 (1999) 159-173
13. Hawkins, R., (2004). The evolving relationship between formal and informal standardisation methods. In ASIA-LINK (Ed.), EU-ASIA Link Reader on I: Scientific discussion and professional experiences in the field of European standardization, II: Workshop: EU-Asia Link Curriculum-framework and assignment of teaching units/modules, Hamburg: Helmut-Schmidt-University, Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg.
14. Tassey G. Standardisation in technology-based markets. Research Policy 29 (2000) 587-602
15. Telecommunication Technology Committee (1995). Survey report on Telecommunication-Related Forums' activities Tokyo. Telecommunication Technology Committee.