Rise of consortia in the information and communication technology industries: Emerging implications for policy

Telecommunications Policy

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 159-173

  Hawkins, Richard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PUBLIC POLICY; STANDARDIZATION;

CONSORTIA TECHNICAL COMMITTEES;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 0033097978     PISSN: 03085961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0308-5961(98)00085-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Arthur, B. (1994). Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.
2. Dosi, G., & F. Malerba, F., (1996). Organizational learning and institutional embeddedness. In: G. Dosi, & F. Malerba, (Eds.), Organization and strategy in the evolution of Enterprise, pp. 1-24. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Gibbs, W. W., (1997). Taking computers to task. Scientific American, 64-71.
4. Hawkins, R. (1992). The doctrine of regionalism: A new dimension for international standardization in telecommunication. Telecommunications Policy, 16(4), 339-353.
5. Hawkins, R. (1997). Emerging technology clusters for new electronic services. Working Paper No. 19, FAIR Consortium, Socio-Economic Impacts of Advanced Communications series. Brighton: SPRU. < http://www.sussex.ac.uk /spru/ink/ >
6. Hawkins, R. (1997b). The changing nature of technical regulation in telecommunication networks. In W. Melody (Ed.), Telecommunication reform: principles and regulatory practices (pp. 197-206). Copenhagen, Technical University of Denmark.
7. ISO/IEC (1990). A vision for the future: Standards needs for emerging technologies, Geneva: ISO/IEC, 1990.
8. Johanson, J. & Mattsson, L. (1987). Interorganizational relations in industrial systems: A network approach compared with a transactions cost approach. International Studies of Management and Organization, 7, 3-24.
9. Mansell, R., Steinmueller, W. E. et al. (1996). The way forward: Advanced communication, economic growth and social development in Europe. European Commission, Advanced Communications Technologies and Services (ACTS) Programme, Brussels, European Commission DGXIII.
10. Mizumoto, T. (1997). Structural weaknesses of information and communication technology standardization in Japan. Keio Communication Review, 19, 19-37.
11. Nelson, R. (1994). The co-evolution of technology: Industrial structure and supporting institutions. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(1), 47-63.
12. Schmidt, S. K., & Werle, R., (1998). Co-ordinating technology: Studies in the international standardization of telecommunications, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Swankin, D. A. (1990). How due process in the development of voluntary standards can reduce the risk of anti-trust liability, Washington: NIST.
14. TTC, 1995. Survey report on Telecommunication-Related Forums' activities. Telecommunications Technology Committee, Tokyo.
15. Updegrove, A. (1994). Forming and representing high-technology consortia: Legal and strategic issues, Computer Lawyer, 8-17.
16. Updegrove, A. (1995). Consortia and the role of government in standard setting, In B. Kahin & J. Abbate, J. (Eds.), Standards policy for information infrastructure (pp. 321-348). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.