The logic of collaboration in education and the human services

Journal of Interprofessional Care

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 225-237

  Lawson, Hal A ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; Complex change; Integrated services

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMMUNITY CARE; COMPETENCE; COOPERATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EDUCATION; GOVERNMENT; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN RELATION; LEADERSHIP; MALPRACTICE; NEGLIGENCE; POLICY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SKILL; SOCIAL WORK; TRUST;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE, INTEGRATED; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NEGOTIATING; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; SOCIAL WORK; TRUST; UNITED STATES;

EID: 4644349900     PISSN: 13561820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13561820410001731278     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Abramson J. & Mizrahi, T. (1996). When social workers and physicians collaborate: Positive and negative interdisciplinary experiences. Social Work, 41, 270-281.
2. Alter, C. (1990). Conflict and cooperation in interorganizational service delivery systems. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 78-502.
3. Clark, P. & Drinka, T. (2002). Exploring responsibility, accountability, and authority in geriatric team performance. In: M. Mezey, C. Cassel, M. Bottrell, K. Hyer, J. Howe & T. Fulmer (eds), Ethical patient care: A casebook for geriatric health teams (pp. 208-229). Baltimore & London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
4. Crowson, R. & Boyd, W. (1996). Achieving coordinated school-linked services: Facilitating utilization of the emerging knowledge base. Educational Policy, 10, 253-272.
5. Duncan, H. (1962). Communication and social order. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Edelman, I. (2001). Participation and service integration in community-based initiatives. Journal of Community Practice, 9, 57-75.
7. Ferguson, R. (1999). Conclusion: Social science research, urban problems, and community development. In: R. Ferguson & W. Dickens (Eds), Urban problems and community development (pp. 569-610). Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution Press.
8. Gardner, S. (1999). Beyond collaboration to results: Hard choices in the future of services to children and families. Fullerton, CA: Center for Collaboration for Children, California State University.
9. Hall, R. (2002). Organizations: structures, processes, and outcomes. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
10. Kraatz, M. (1998). Learning by association? Interorganizational networks and adaptation to environmental change? Academy of Management Review, 41, 621-643.
11. Lawson, H. (2003). Pursuing and securing collaboration to improve results. In M. Brabeck and M. Walsh (Eds), Meeting at the hyphen: Schools-universities-communities-professions in collaboration for student achievement and well being (pp. 45-73). The 102nd Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education Yearbook. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Lawson, H. & Barkdull, C. (2001). Gaining the collaborative advantage and promoting systems and cross-systems change. In: A. Sallee, H. Lawson & K. Briar-Lawson (Eds), Innovative practices with vulnerable children and families (pp. 245-270). Dubuque, IA: Eddie Bowers Publishers, Inc.
13. Lawson, H. & Briar-Lawson, K. (1997). Connecting the dots: Integrating school reform, school-linked services, parent involvement and community schools. Oxford, OH: The Danforth Foundation & The Institute for Educational Renewal at Miami University.
14. Lawson, H. & Sailor, W. (2000). Integrating services, collaborating, and developing connections with schools. Focus on Exceptional Children, 33, 1-22.
15. McCann, J. & Gray, B. (1986). Power and collaboration in human service domains. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 6, 58-67.
16. McKnight, J. (1995). The careless society: Community and its counterfeits. New York: Basic Books.
17. Mitchell, R., Agle, B. & Wood, D. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853-886.
18. Molm, L., Takahashi, N. & Peterson, G. (2000). Risk and trust in social exchange: An experimental test of a classical proposition. American Journal of Sociology, 105, 1496-1427.
19. Moore, R. & Sandler, S. (2004). Supporting the education organizing movement: An exchange between intermediaries. San Francisco: Justice Matters Institute.
20. Nathan, M. & Mitroff, I. (1991). The use of negotiated order theory as a tool for the analysis and development of an interorganizational Field. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 163-180.
21. Oliver, C. (1990). Determinants of interorganizational relationships: Integration and future directions.' Academy of Management Review, 15, 241-265.
22. Oliver, C. (1992). The antecedents of deinstitutionalization. Organization Studies, 13, 563-588.
23. Ray, K. (2002). The nimble collaboration: Fine-tuning your collaboration for lasting success. St. Paul, MN: Amherst H. Wilder Foundation.
24. Reason, P. (1999). General medical and complementary practitioners working together: The epistemological demands of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 71-86.
25. Reilly, T. (2000). Collaboration in action: An uncertain process. Administration in Social Work, 25, 53-74.
26. Sandfort, J. (1999). The Structural impediments to human service collaboration: Examining welfare reform at the front line. Social Service Review, 73, 314-339.
27. Schmitt, M. (2001). Collaboration improves the quality of care: methodological challenges and evidence from US health care research. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 15, 47-66.
28. Seashore Louis, K., Toole, J. & Hargreaves, A. (1999). Rethinking school improvement. In J. Murphy, & K. Seashore Louis (eds), The handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 277-295). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
29. Shrader, R. (2001). Collaboration and performance in foreign markets: The case of high-technology manufacturing firms. Academy of Management Review, 44, 45-60.
30. Vangen, S. & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39, 5-31.
31. Wandersman, A., Valois, R., Ochs, L., de la Cruz, D., Adkins, E. & Goodman, R. (1996). Toward a social ecology of community coalitions. American Journal of Health Promotion, 10, 299-307.
32. White, J. & Wehlage, G. (1995). Community collaboration: If it is such a good idea, why is it so hard? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17, 23-38.
33. Wood, D. & Gray, B. (1991). Toward a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 27, 139-162.