Participation and service integration in community-based initiatives

Journal of Community Practice

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 57-75

  Edelman, Ira ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based initiatives; Community participation; Cost effective social services; Service integration

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644337049     PISSN: 10705422     EISSN: 15433706     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J125v09n01_04     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams, P., and Nelson, K., 1995. “Introduction.”. In Reinventing human services, Edited by:Paul, Adams, and Nelson, Kristine. 1–14. New York:Aldine de Gruyter.
2. Adkins Amee, C. A., Noblit, G. W., and Richards, P. L., eds. 1999. Working together:Grounded perspectives on interagency collaboration, Cresskill, NJ:Hampton Press, Inc.
3. The Aspen Institute. 1997. Voices from the field:Learning from the early work of comprehensive community initiatives, Washington D.C.:The Aspen Institute.
4. Berry, J., Portney, K. E, and Thomson, K., 1993. The rebirth of urban democracy, Washington, D.C.:The Brookings Institution.
5. Braithwaite, J., 1993. Beyond positivism:Learning from contextual integrated strategies. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 30(4):383–399.
6. Calfee, C., Wittwer, F., and Merideth, M., 1998. Building a full-service school:A step-by-step guide, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers, Inc.
7. Carter, J. L., 1996. New partnerships with families:essential for program and policy. Georgia Academy Journal, 3(2):70–72.
8. Crowson Robert, L., 1998. School-community relations under reform, (2nd Edition), Berkeley, California:McCutcheon Publishing Company.
9. FIT, Family Investment Trust. 1995a. Missourians working together:A progress report, St. Louis, MO:FIT.
10. FIT, Family Investment Trust. 1995b. SUMMARY. Strong families through community, St. Louis, MO:FIT.
11. Fisher, R., 1993. Let the people decide:neighborhood organizing in America. Updated Edition, New York:Twayne Publishers.
12. Flower, J., 1998. A toolkit for building a healthy city. National Civic Review, 87(4):293–310.
13. Franklin, C., and Streeter, C. L., 1995. School reform:Linking public schools with human services. Social Work, 40(6):773–782.
14. Halpern, R., 1995. Rebuilding the inner city:A history of neighborhood initiative to address poverty in the United States, New York:Columbia University Press.
15. Kusserow, R. P., 1990. Services integration:A twenty-year retrospective, Washington, D.C.:Department of Health and Human Services.
16. Lehman, J. S., and Smeedling, T. M., 1997. “Neighborhood effects and federal policy.”. In Neighborhood poverty:Volume II, Edited by:Brooks-Gunn, Jeanne, Greg Duncan, J., and Lawrence Aber, J., 251–278. New York:Russell Sage Foundation.
17. Meier, D., 2000. “Can the odds be changed? What will it take to make small schools ordinary practice”. In Creating new schools:How small schools are changing American education, Edited by:Clinchy, Evans. New York:Teachers College Press.
18. Melaville, A., 1998. Learning together:The developing field of school-community initiatives, Flint, MI:The Mott Foundation.
19. Melaville, A., and Blank, M. J., 1993. Together we can:A guide for crafting a Pro-family system of education and human Services, Washington, D.C.:U.S. Departments of Education and Human Services.
20. Mizrahi, T., 1999. Strategies for effective collaboration in the human services. Social Policy, 29(4):5–20.
21. Moses, C. W., and Coltoff, P., 1999. “Organizational change to promote psychosocial and academic development.”. In Collaborative practice:School and human service partnerships, Edited by:Robbie Tourse, W. C., and Jean Mooney, F., 242–264. Westport, CT:Praeger.
22. Philliber, S., 1998. “The virtue of specificity in theory of change evaluation.”. In New approaches to evaluating community initiatives, volume 2:Theory, measurement, and analysis, Edited by:Fullbright-Anderson, Karen, Anne Kubisch, C., and James Connell, P., 87–99. Washington, D.C.:The Aspen Institute.
23. Phillips, J., and Springer, J. F., 1997. Lessons learned from community-partnership demonstration programs, Sacramento, CA:EMT Associates, Incorporated.
24. Pounder, D. G., 1998. Restructuring schools for collaboration:promises and pitfalls, Albany, NY:The State University of New York Press.
25. Rigsby, L. C., Reynolds, M. C., and Wang, M. C., eds. 1995. School-community connections:Exploring issues for research and practice, San Francisco:Jossey-Bass Publishers.
26. Schorr, L., 1997. Common purpose:Strengthening families and neighborhoods to rebuild America, New York:Anchor Books.
27. Shirley, D., 1998. Community organizing for urban school reform, Austin, Texas:University of Texas Press.
28. Smale, G. G., 1995. “Integrating community and individual practice.”. In Reinventing human services, Edited by:Adams, Paul, and Nelson, Kristine. 70–89. New York:Aldine de Gruyter.
29. Smylie, M. A., Crowson, R. L., Chou, V., and Levin, R. A., 1996. “The principal and community-school connections in Chicago's radical reform.”. In Coordination among schools, families, and communities:Prospects for reform, Edited by:James Cibulka, G., and Wm. Kritek, J., 171–196. Albany, NY:SUNY Press.
30. Warren, M., 1998. Community building and political power. The American Behavioral Scientist, 42(1):78–92.
31. White, J. A., and Wehlage, G., 1995. Community collaboration:If it is such a good idea, why is it so hard to do?. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(1):23–38.