Transport of alkali halides through a liquid organic membrane containing a ditopic salt-binding receptor

Inorganic Chemistry

Volumn 43, Issue 19, 2004, Pages 5902-5907

  Mahoney, Joseph M ^a   Nawaratna, Gayathri U ^b   Beatty, Alicia M ^a   Duggan, Peter J ^b   Smith, Bradley D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALKALI; ANION; BROMINE; CALIXARENE; CATION; CHLORIDE ION; DITOPIC SALT RECEPTOR; HALIDE; LITHIUM CHLORIDE; LITHIUM ION; MONOTOPIC ANION RECEPTOR; MONOTOPIC CATION RECEPTOR; POTASSIUM BROMIDE; POTASSIUM CHLORIDE; POTASSIUM IODIDE; POTASSIUM ION; RECEPTOR; SODIUM BROMIDE; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SODIUM IODIDE; SODIUM ION; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DIFFUSION; HYDROPHILICITY; LIQUID; MEMBRANE BINDING; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; SOLID; SOLID STATE; SOLUBILITY; X RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHY; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 4644333267     PISSN: 00201669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ic0494859     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Principles and Practices of Solvent Extraction; Rydberg, J., Nusikas, C., Choppin, G. R., Eds.; Marcel Dekker: New York, 1992.
2. (b) Fundamentals and Applications of Anion Separations; Moyer, B. A., Singh, R. P., Eds.; Kluwer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2004.
3. Gloe, K.; Stephan, H.; Grotjahn, M. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2003, 26, 1107-1117.
4. Phase Transfer Catalysis, Fundamentals, Applications, and Industrial Perspectives; Starks, C. M., Liotta, C. L., Halpern, M., Eds.; Chapman and Hall: New York, 1994.
5. Lamb, J. D.; Chrisstensen, J. L.; Izatt, S. R.; Bedke, K.; Astin, M.; Izatt, R. M. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1980, 102, 3399-3407.
6. Recent examples of dual receptor systems that simultaneously complex an anion and a cation: (a) Byriel, K. A.; Gasperov, V.; Gloe, K.; Kennard, C. H. L.; Leong, A. J.; Lindoy, L. F.; Mahinay, M. S.; Pham, H. T.; Tasker, P. A.; Thorp, D.; Turner, P. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 3034-3040.
7. (b) Cafeo, G.; Gargiulli, C.; Gattuso, G.; Kohnke, F. H.; Notti, A.; Occhipinti, S.; Pappalardo, S.; Parisi, M. F. Tetrahedron Lett. 2002, 43, 8103-8106.
8. (c) Cafeo, G.; Gattuso, G.; Kohnke, F. H.; Notti, A.; Occhipinti, S.; Pappalardo, S.; Parisi, M. F. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2002, 41, 2122-2126.
9. (d) Qian, Q.; Wilson, G. S.; Bowman-James, K.; Girault, H. H. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 497-503.
10. (e) Kavallieratos, K.; Moyer, B. A. Chem. Commun. 2001, 1620-1621.
11. (f) Kavallieratos, K.; Sachleben, R. A.; Van Berkel, G. J.; Moyer, B. A. Chem. Commun. 2000, 187-188.
12. For recent papers that discuss ditopic salt-binding receptors, see the following: (a) Plieger, P. G.; Tasker, P. A.; Galbraith, S. G. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2004, 313-318.
13. (b) Pajewski, R.; Ferdani, R.; Schlesinger, P. H.; Gokel, G. W. Chem. Commun. 2004, 160-161.
14. (c) Zhou, L.; Sun, H.; Li, H.; Wang, H.; Zhang, X.; Wu, S.; Lee, S. Org. Lett. 2004, 6, 1071-1074,
15. (d) Gale, P. A. Coord. Chem. Rev. 2003, 240, 191-221.
16. (e) Webber, P. R. A.; Beer, P. D. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 2249-2252.
17. (f) Tongraung, P.; Chantarasiri, N.; Tuntulani, T. Tetrahedron Lett. 2003, 44, 29-32.
18. (g) de Silva, A. P.; McClean, G. D.; Pagliari, S. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2010-2011.
19. (h) Miyaji, H.; Collinson, S. R.; Prokes, I.; Tucker, J. H. R. Chem. Commun. 2003, 64-65.
20. (i) Mansikkamaki, H.; Nissinen, M.; Schalley, C. A.; Rissanen, K. New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 88-97.
21. (j) Vivas-Reyes, R.; De Proft, F.; Biesemans, M.; Willem, R.; Geerlings, P. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2003, 1315-1324.
22. (k) Tozawa, T.; Tachikawa, T.; Tokita, S.; Kubo, Y. New J. Chem. 2003, 27, 221-223.
23. Cametti, M.; Nissinen, M.; Cort, A. D.; Mandolini, L.; Rissanen, K. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2420-2421.
24. (m) Glenny, M. W.; Blake, A. J.; Wilson, C.; Schroder, M. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 1941-1951.
25. (n) Akkus, N.; Campbell, J. C.; Davidson, J.; Henderson, D. K.; Miller, H. A.; Parkin, A.; Parsons, S.; Pleiger, P. G.; Swart, R. M.; Tasker, P. A.; West, L. C. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 1932-1940.
26. (o) Coxall, R. A.; Lindoy, L. F.; Miller, H. A.; Parkins, A.; Parsons, S.; Tasker, P. A.; White, D. J. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 55-64.
27. (p) Evans, A. J.; Beer, P. D. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 4451-4456.
28. (q) Bourgeois, J.; Fujita, M.; Kawano, M.; Sakamoto, S.; Yamaguchi, K. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 9260-9261.
29. (r) Oh, J. M.; Cho. E. J.; Ryu, B. J.; Lee, Y. J.; Nam, K. C. Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 2003, 24, 1538-1540.
30. (s) Kotch, F. W.; Sidorov, V.; Lam, Y. F.; Kayser, K. J.; Li, H.; Kaucher, M. S.; Davis, J. T. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 15140-15150.
31. (t) Camiolo, S.; Coles, S. J.; Gale, P. A.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Tizzard, G. J. Supramol. Chem. 2003, 15, 231-234.
32. (u) Albrecht, M.; Zauner, J.; Eisele, T.; Weis, P. Synthesis 2003, 7, 1105-1111.
33. (v) Tumcharern, G.; Tuntulani, T.; Coles, S. J.; Hursthouse, M. B.; Kilburn, J. D. Org. Lett. 2003, 5, 4971-4974.
34. (w) Atwood, J. L.; Szumna, A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 940-941.
35. Chrisstoffels, L. A. J.; De Jong, F.; Reinhoudt, D. N.; Sivelli, S.; Gazzola, L.; Casnati, A.; Ungaro, R. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 10142-10151.
36. (b) Beer, P. D.; Hopkins, P. K.; McKinney, J. D. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1253-1254.
37. (c) Farrell, D.; Gloe, K.; Gloe, K.; Goretzki, G.; McKee, V.; Nelson, J.; Nieuwenhuyzen, M.; Pal, I.; Stephan, H.; Town, R. M.; Wichmann. K. J. Chem. Soc., Dalton Trans. 2003, 1961-1968.
38. Mahoney, J. M.; Beatty, A. M.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2001, 123, 5847-5848.
39. (b) Koulov, A. V.; Mahoney, J. M.; Beatty, A. M.; Smith, B. D. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2003, 1, 27-29.
40. (c) Mahoney, J. M.; Marshall, R. A.; Beatty, A. M.; Smith, B. D.; Camiolo, S.; Gale, P. A. J. Supramol. Chem. 2001, 1, 289-292.
41. (d) Mahoney, J. M.; Davis, J. P.; Smith. B. D. J. Org. Chem. 2003, 68, 9819-6820.
42. In the specific cases of 1·KCl and 1·KBr, the respective unit cells contain two independent but structurally similar complexes.
43. The typical M-O distances for 1,10-diaza-18-crown-6 complexes are ∼2.45 Å for Na-O and ∼2.75 Å for K-O: (a) De Wall, S. L.; Meadows, E. S.; Barbour, L. J.; Gokel, G. W. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2000, 97, 6271-6276.
44. (b) De Wall, S. L.; Meadows, E. S.; Barbour, L. J.; Gokel, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121, 5613-5614.
45. (c) De Wall, S. L.; Meadows, E. S.; Barbour, L. J.; Gokel, G. W. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1553-1554.
46. (d) Meadows, E. S.; De Wall, S. L.; Barbour, L. J.; Gokel, G. W. Chem. Commun. 1999, 1555-1556.
47. (e) Gandour, R. D.; Fronczek, F. R.; Gatto, V. J.; Minganti, C.; Schultz, R. A.; White, B. D.; Arnold, K. A.; Mazzocchi, A. D.; Miller, S. R.; Gokel, G. W. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1986, 108, 4078-4088.
48. A-N distances for hydrogen-bonded halide-amide complexes follow. (a) Cl-N, 3.33 Å: Deetz, M. J.; Shang, M.; Smith, B. D. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 6201-6207.
49. (b) Br-N, 3.54 Å: Kavallieratos, K.; Bertao, C. M.; Crabtree, R. H. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1675-1683.
50. (c) I-N, ∼3.75 Å: Jeffreys, J. A. D.; Ferguson, G. J. Chem. Soc. B 1970, 826-829. Funato, N.; Takayanagi, H.; Konda, Y.; Toda, Y.; Harigaya, Y.; Iwai, Y.; Omura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,35, 1251-1254.
51. (c) I-N, ∼3.75 Å: Jeffreys, J. A. D.; Ferguson, G. J. Chem. Soc. B 1970, 826-829. Funato, N.; Takayanagi, H.; Konda, Y.; Toda, Y.; Harigaya, Y.; Iwai, Y.; Omura, S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1994,35, 1251-1254.
52. Wells, A. F. Structural Inorganic Chemistry, 5th ed.; Oxford University Press: Oxford, 1984; p 444.
53. Stolwijk, T. B.; Sudhölter, E. J. R.; Reinhoudt, D. N. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 7042-7047.
54. Levitskaia, T.; Marquez, M.; Sessler, J. L.; Shriver, J. A.; Vercouter, T.; Moyer, B. A. Chem. Commun. 2003, 2248-2249.
55. Olsher, U.; Kankins, M.; Kim, Y. D.; Bartsch, R. A. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1993, 115, 3370-3371.
56. Koulov, A. V.; Lambert, T. N.; Suklah, R.; Jain, M.; Boon, J. M.; Smith, B. D.; Li, H.; Sheppard, D. N.; Joos, J.; Clare, J. P.; Davis, A. P. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4931-4933.
57. -, and hence, its diffusion constant is likely to be higher. However, this effect alone is not enough to fully account for the observed increase in flux.
58. Smith, B. D.; Davis, J. P.; Draffin, S. P.; Duggan, P. J. Supramol. Chem. 2004, 16, 87-90.
59. 3 or the liquid membrane, NPOE. The X-ray structure of 1·KCl shows that the salt is bound inside the receptor as a contact ion pair with many ideal noncovalent interactions. It seems unlikely that KCl would bind strongly to the receptor if it were a solvent-separated ion pair. Even if this were the case, the fundamental conclusion of the study would be unchanged; for example, the polarity of a receptor-salt complex will be lowered if the salt is bound to the receptor as an associated ion pair (a contact ion pair is the best case). A complex with lowered polarity is more likely to diffuse faster through the liquid membrane.