Central and parietal event-related lateralizations in a flanker task

Psychophysiology

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 762-771

  Willemssen, Rita ^a   Hoormann, Jörg ^a   Hohnsbein, Joachim ^a   Falkenstein, Michael ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ RESEARCH CENTRE FOR WORKING ENVIRONMENT AND HUMAN FACTORS   (Germany)

Author keywords

Direction encoding lateralization; Event related potential; Flanker task; Lateralized readiness potential

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIRECTION ENCODING LATERALIZATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LATERALIZED READINESS POTENTIAL; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PREMOTOR CORTEX; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TASK PERFORMANCE; TOPOGRAPHY;

ADULT; ATTENTION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROOCULOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; PARIETAL LOBE; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 4644299463     PISSN: 00485772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00201.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Berg, P. (1999). Konstanz Format. EEG and psychophysiology data analysis programs. Manual. Konstanz University: Author.
2. Berg, P., & Scherg, M. (1994). A multiple source approach to the correction of eye artifacts. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 90, 229-241.
3. Christ, S., Falkenstein, M., Heuer, H., & Hohnsbein, J. (2000). Different error types and error processing in spatial stimulus-response- compatibility tasks: Behavioral and electrophysiological data. Biological Psychology, 51, 129-150.
4. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-553.
5. De Jong, R., Liang, C. C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
6. Eimer, M. (1993). Spatial cueing, sensory gating and selective response preparation: An ERP study on visuo-spatial orienting. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 88, 408-420.
7. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
8. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
9. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoormann, J. (1994a). Time pressure effects on late components of the event-related potential (ERP). Journal of Psychophysiology, 8, 22-30.
10. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., & Hoormann, J. (1994b). Effects of choice complexity on different subcomponents of the late positive complex of the event-related potential. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 92, 148-160.
11. Geisser, S., & Greenhouse, S. W. (1958). An extension of box's results on the use of the F distribution in multivariate analysis. Annals of Mathematics and Statistics, 29, 885-891.
12. Hommel, B. (1994). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research, 56, 197-184.
13. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
14. Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282-294.
15. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-A model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
16. Mattler, U. (2003). Delayed flanker effects in lateralized readiness potentials. Experimental Brain Research, 151, 272-288.
17. Nunez, P. L. (2000). Toward a quantitative description of large-scale neocortical dynamic function and EEG. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 371-437.
18. Osman, A., Bashore,T. R., Coles, M. G. H., Donchin, E., & Meyer, D. E. (1992). On the transmittion of partial information: Inferences from movement-related brain potentials. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 217-232.
19. Scherg, M. (2003). BESA software package, version 4.2.28. München: MEGIS Software GmbH.
20. Simon, J. R., & Rudell, A. P. (1967). Auditory S-R compatibility: The effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 300-304.
21. Simon, J. R., Sly, P. E., & Vilapakkam, S. (1981). Effect of compatibility of S-R mapping on reactions toward the stimulus source. Acta Psychologica, 47, 63-81.
22. Sommer, W., Ulrich, R., & Leuthold, H. (1996). Das Lateralisierte Bereitschaftspotential als psychophysiologischer Zugang bei der Untersuchung kognitiver Prozesse. Psychologische Rundschau, 47, 1-14.
23. Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: an ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147-162.
24. Valle-Inclán, F., & Redondo, M. (1998). On the automaticity of ipsilateral response activation in the Simon effect. Psychophysiology, 35, 366-371.
25. Wascher, E., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (1997). EEG-Korrelate unerschiedlicher Informationsverarbeitung zur Reaktionsauswahl. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, XLIV, 82-102.
26. Wascher, E., Reinhard, M., Wauschkuhn, B., & Verleger, R. (1999). Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli: An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 214-229.