Spatial S-R compatibility with centrally presented stimuli: An event-related asymmetry study on dimensional overlap

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 214-229

  Wascher, Edmund ^a   Reinhard, Meike ^b   Wauschkuhn, Bernd ^b   Verleger, Rolf ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTINGENT NEGATIVE VARIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESPONSE TIME; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; SPATIAL ORIENTATION;

ADULT; CEREBRAL CORTEX; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FIXATION, OCULAR; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; REACTION TIME; SOMATOSENSORY CORTEX; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL CORTEX; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS;

EID: 0032904152     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/089892999563346     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersen, R. A., Essick, G. K., & Siegel, R. M. (1985). Encoding of spatial location by posterior parietal neurons. Science, 230, 456-458.
2. Coles, M. G. H., Gehring, W. J., Gratton, G., & Donchin, E. (1992). Response activation and verification: A psychophysiological analysis. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 779-792.
3. Coles, M. G. H., Gratton, G., Bashore, T. R., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1985). A psychophysiological investigation of the continuous flow model of human information processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 11, 529-533.
4. Corbetta, M., Miezin, F. M., Shulman, G. L., & Petersen, S. E. (1993). A PET study of visuospatial attention. Journal of Neuroscience, 13, 1202-1226.
5. Dallal, G. E. (1986). STAT-SAK: The Statistician's Swiss Army Knife, V1.0. Boston: Tufts University.
6. De Jong, R., Liang, C.-C., & Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual-process model of effects of spatial stimulus-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
7. De Jong, R., Wierda, M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1988). Use of partial information in response processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 682-692.
8. Elmer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
9. Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974). Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task. Perception and Psychophysics, 16, 143-149.
10. Falkenstein, M., Hohnsbein, J., Hoormann, J., & Blanke, L. (1991). Effects of crossmodal divided attention on late ERP components. II. Error processing in choice reaction tasks. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 78, 447-455.
11. Fitts, P. M., & Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
12. Flowers, J. H. (1990), Priming effects in perceptual classification. Perception and Psychophysics, 47, 135-148.
13. Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., Sirevaag, E. J., Eriksen, C. W., & Donchin, E. (1988). Pre-and post-stimulus activation of response channels: A psychophysiological analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 331-344.
14. Gratton, G., Corballis, P. M., & Jain, D. (1997). Hemispheric organization of visual memories. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 92-104.
15. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior: A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.
16. Hommel, B. (1994). Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity. Psychological Research, 56, 179-184.
17. Hommel, B. (1995). Attentional scanning in the selection of central targets from multi-symbol strings. Visual Cognition, 2, 116-144.
18. Iacoboni, M., Woods, R. P., Mazziotta, J. C. (1996). Brain-behavior relationships: Evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus-response compatibility. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 321-331.
19. Jasper, H. H. (1958). The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 10, 371-375.
20. Kopp, B., Mattler, U., Goertz, R., & Rist, F. (1996). N2, P3 and the lateralized readiness potential in a no-go task involving selective response priming, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 19-27.
21. Kopp, B., Mattler, U., & Rist, F. (1994). Selective attention and response competition in schizophrenic patients. Psychiatry Research, 53, 129-139.
22. Kopp, B., Rist, F., & Mattler, U. (1996). N200 in the flanker task as a neurobehavioral tool for investigating executive control. Psychophysiology, 33, 282-294.
23. Kornblurn, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: The case of Stroop-and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135.
24. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
25. Lu, C.-H., & Proctor, R. W. (1995). The influence of irrelevant location information on performance: A review of the Simon and spatial Stroop effects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2, 174-207.
26. Mangun, G. R., & Hillyard, S. A. (1991). Modulations of sensory-evoked brain potentials indicate changes in perceptual processing during visual-spatial priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 17, 1057-1074.
27. McIntosh, A. R., Grady, C. L., Ungerleider, L. G., Haxby, J. V., Rapoport, S. I., & Horwitz, B. (1994). Network analysis of cortical visual pathways mapped with PET. Journal of Neuroscience, 14, 655-666.
28. Milner, A. D. & Goodale, M. A. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Pivik, R. T., Broughton, R. J., Coppola, R., Davidson, R. J., Fox, N., & Nuwer, M. R. (1993). Guidelines for the recording and quantitative analysis of electroencephalographic activity in research contexts. Psycbophysiology, 30, 547-558.
30. Requin, J., Riehle, A., & Seal, J. (1988). Neural activity and information processing in motor control: From stages to continuos flow. Biological Psychology, 26, 179-198.
31. Rösler, F., & Finger, T. (1993). A psychophysiological analysis of response-channel activation and outcome states in Eriksen's noise-compatibility task. Psychological Research, 55, 20-28.
32. Selemon, L. D., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (1988), Common cortical and subcortical targets of the dorsolateral prefrontal and posterior parietal cortices in the Rhesus monkey: Evidence for a distributed neural network subserving spatially guided behavior. Journal of Neuroscience, 8, 4049-4068.
33. Simon, J. R. (1969). Reactions towards the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, 174-176.
34. Simon, J. R. (1990). The effects of an irrelevant directional cue on human information processing. In R. W. Proctor & T. G. Reeve (Eds.), Stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 31-86). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
35. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., & Mulder, L. J. M. (1990). Selective response activation can begin before stimulus recognition is complete: A psychophysiological and error analysis of continuous flow. Acta Psychologica, 71, 169-201.
36. Smid, H. G. O. M., Mulder, G., Mulder, L. J. M., & Brands, G. J. (1992). A psychophysiological study of the use of partial information in stimulus-response translation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 1101-1119.
37. Stoffels, E. J., & van der Molen, M. W. (1988). Effects of visual and auditory noise on visual choice reaction time in a continuous-flow paradigm. Perception and Psychophysics, 44, 7-14.
38. Ungerleider, L., G., & Mishkin, M. (1982). Two cortical visual systems. In D. J. Ingle, M. A. Goodale, & R. J. W. Mansfield (Eds.), Analyses of visual behavior (p. 549-586). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Valle-Inclán, F. (1996). The locus of interference in the Simon effect: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 43, 147-162.
40. Wascher, E., Verleger, R., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996). In pursuit of the Simon effect: The effect of S-R compatibility investigated by event-related potentials. Journal of Psychophysiology, 10, 336-346.
41. Wascher, E., & Wauschkuhn, B. (1996), The interaction of stimulus-and response-related processes measured by event-related lateralizations of the EEG. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 99, 149-162.
42. Wauschkuhn, B., Wascher, E., & Verleger, R. (1997). Lateralized cortical activity due to preparation of saccades and finger movements: A comparative study. Etectroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 102, 114-124.
43. Yamaguchi, S., Tsuchiya, H., & Kobayashi, S. (1994). Electroencephalographic activity associated with shifts of visuospatial attention. Brain, 117, 526-553.