Library usage patterns in the electronic information environment

Information Research

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2004, Pages

  Franklin, Brinley ^a   Plum, Terry ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

^b SIMMONS COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4644291610     PISSN: 13681613     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Antelman, K. (Ed.) (2002). Database-driven Web sites. New York: Haworth Information Press.
2. Baron, J. and Siepmann, M. (1999). Techniques for creating and using Web questionnaires in research and teaching. Retrieved 15 October 2003 from the University of Pennsylvania, Department of Psychology Website at http://www.psych.upenn.edu/~baron/examples/baron4.htm
3. Bertot, J.C. (2001). Measuring service quality in the networked environment: approaches and considerations. Library Trends, 49(4), 758-775.
4. Bertot, J.C., McClure, C.R. & Ryan, J. (2002). Statistics and performance measures for public library networked services. Chicago: American Library Association.
5. Breeding, M. (2002). Strategies for measuring and implementing e-use. Library Technology Reports, 38 (3), 1-70.
6. Couper, M.P. (2000). Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64(4), 464-494.
7. Couper, M.P., Traugott, M.W. & Mark, J.L. (2001). Web survey design and administration. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(2), 230-253.
8. Covey, D. (2002). Usage and usability assessment: library practices and concerns. Washington, DC: Digital Library Federation and Council on Library and Information Resources. (CLIR Report 105.) Retrieved 15 October, 2003 from the Council on Library and Information Resources Website at http://www.clir.org/ pubs/reports/pub105/contents.html
9. Dayton, C.M. & Scheers, N.J. (1990). Library study sample size determination for ratio estimators. Part I-Sensitivity study; Part II- Sample size tables (Unpublished technical report). [Note: Dayton is Professor of Statistics, University of Maryland.]
10. Dillman, D.A. & Bowker, D.K. (2001). The Web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. In,Ulf-Dietrich Reips & Michael Bosnjak, (Eds.). Dimensions of Internet science. Lengerich, Germany: Pabst Science Publishers. Retrieved 15 October 2003 from http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/ zuma_paper_dillman_bowker.pdf
11. Dillman, D.A., Tortora, R.D. & Bowker, D. (1998). Principles for constructing Web surveys. Pullman, WA: Washington State University, Social & Economic Sciences Research Center. (SESRC Technical Report 98-50). Retrieved 15 October 2003 from http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/Websurveyppr.pdf
12. Franklin, B. (2001). Academic research library support of sponsored research in the United States. In, Joan Stein, Martha Kyrillidou and Denise Davis, (Eds.) Proceedings of the 4th Northumbria International Conference on Performance Measurement in Libraries and Information Services. (pp. 105-112) Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
13. Franklin, B. & Plum, T. (2002). Networked electronic services usage patterns at four academic health sciences libraries. Performance Measurement and Metrics, 3(3), 132-133.
14. Gunn, H. (2002). Web-based surveys: changing the survey process. First Monday, 7(12). Retrieved 15 October 2003 from http://firstmonday.org/issues/ issue7_12/gunn/index.html
15. Kyrillidou, M. (1998, April). An overview of performance measures in higher education and libraries. ARL: A Bimonthly Newsletter of Research Library Issues and Actions, (197). Retrieved 29 April, 2004 from http://www.arl.org/ newsltr/197/overview.html
16. Lazar, J. & Preece, J. (2002). Using electronic surveys to evaluate networked resources: from idea to implementation. In, Charles R. McClure and John Carlo Bertot, (Eds.). Evaluating Networked Information Services: Techniques, Policy and Issues. (pp. 137-154). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
17. Lee, A.C., Frank, J.R., Cole, G., Mikhael, N.Z. & Miles, C.A. (2002). Web-based surveys for data gathering from medical educators: an exploration of the efficacy and impact of follow-up reminders. Paper presented at a meeting of the American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting. New Orleans, LA, April 2002. (ERIC Document. ED465792).
18. Luthor, J. (2000). White paper on electronic journal usage statistics. Washington, DC. Council on Library and Information Resources. Retrieved 15 October 2003 from the Council on Library and Information Resources Website at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub94/contents.html
19. McClure, C.R. & Bertot, J.C. (2001). Evaluating networked information services: techniques, policy and issues. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
20. Perkins, G.H. & Yuan, H. (2001). A comparison of Web-based and paper-and-pencil library satisfaction survey results." College & Research Libraries, 62(4), 369-377.
21. Shepherd, P.T. & Davis, D.M. (2002). Electronic metrics, performance measures, and statistics for publishers and libraries. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(4), 659-663.
22. Shim, W. & McClure, C.R. (2002). Data needs and use of electronic resources at academic research libraries. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(2): 217-236.
23. Tenopir, C. & Read, E. (2000). Patterns of database use in academic libraries. College and Research Libraries, 61(3), 236-246.
24. Thompson, B., Cook, C. & Thompson, R.L. (2002). Reliability and structure of LibQUAL+™ scores: measuring perceived library service quality. portal: Libraries and the Academy, 2(1), 3-12.
25. Unites States. Office of Management and Budget. (2000). OMB circular No. A-21: principles for determining costs applicable to grants, contracts, and other agreements with educational institutions. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.