An experimental method for measuring the emergence of new ideas in information discovery

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 460-477

  Kerne, Andruid ^a,b   Smith, Steven M ^a   Koh, Eunyee ^a   Choi, Hyun ^a   Graeber, Ross ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL METHODS; HUMAN CREATIVITY; INFORMATION COLLECTIONS; INFORMATION DISCOVERY; INFORMATION RESOURCE; NEW EXPERIMENTAL METHOD;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING;

INFORMATION SCIENCE;

EID: 46349093651     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: 15327590     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10447310802142243     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baddeley, A. D. (1992). Is working memory working? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44A, 1-31.
2. Baldonado, M., & Winograd, T. (1997). SenseMaker: An information-exploration interface supporting the contextual evolution of a user's interests. Proceedings of ACM Computer Human Interaction, 11-18.
3. Bates, M. (1989). The design of browsing and berry picking techniques for the online search interface. Online Review, 13(5), 407-431.
4. Belkin, N. (1982). ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38, 61-71.
5. Burke, M. (1999). Organization of multimedia resources. Hampshire, UK: Gower.
6. Carney, R. M., & Levin, J. R. (2002, March). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14, 5-26.
7. Costello, F. J., & Keane, M. T. (2000). Efficient creativity: Constraint guided conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 24, 299-349.
8. Ding, W., Marchionini, G., & Soergel, D. (1999). Multimodal surrogates for video browsing. Proceedings of Digital Libraries, 85-93.
9. Estes, Z., & Glucksberg, S. (2000). Interactive property attribution in concept combination. Memory & Cognition, 28, 28-34.
10. Estes, Z., & Ward, T. B. (2002). The emergence of novel attributes in concept modification. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 149-156.
11. Finke, R., Ward, T., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Fisher, K. E., Erdelez, S., & McKechnie, L. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of information behavior (ASSIST Monograph). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
13. Frechtling, J., & Sharp, L. (Eds.). (1997, August). User-friendly handbook for mixed method evaluations. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation Directorate for Education and Human Resources, Retrieved from http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/1997/nsf97153/start.htm
14. Glenberg, A. M. (2002). The Indexical hypothesis: Meaning from language, world, and image. In N. Allen (Ed.), Words and images: Working together - Working differently. Norwood, NJ: Albex.
15. Glenberg, A. M., & Langston, W. E. (1992, April). Comprehension of illustrated text: Pictures help to build mental models. Journal of Memory & Language, 31(2), 129-151.
16. Harter, S. P. (1992). Psychological relevance and information science. Journal of the American Society for Version 1.0 Information Science, 43(9), 602-615.
17. Hampton, J. A. (1997). Emergent attributes in combined concepts. In T. B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.), Creative thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes (pp. 83-110). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
18. Horvitz, E. (1999). Principles of mixed-initiative user interfaces. Proceedings of ACM CHI 1999, 159-166.
19. Interface Ecology Lab. (2007). combinFormation. Retrieved from http://ecologylab.cs.tamu.edu/combinFormation/
20. Kerne, A., Koh, E., Dworaczyk, B., Mistrot, M. J., Choi, H., Smith, S. M., et al.(2006). combinFormation: A mixed-initiative system for representing collections as compositions of image and text surrogates. Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2006, 11-20.
21. Kerne, A., & Koh, E. (2007). Representing collections as compositions to support distributed creative cognition and situated creative learning. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 13(2).
22. Kerne, A., Koh, E., Smith, S., Choi, H., Graeber, R., & Webb, A. (2007). Promoting emergence in information discovery by representing collections with composition. Proceedings of ACM Creativity & Cognition 2007, 117-126.
23. Kerne, A., & Smith, S. (2004). The information discovery framework. Proceedings of Designing Interactive Systems 2004, 357-360.
24. Kerne, A., Smith, S. M., Choi, H., Graeber, R., & Caruso, D. (2005). Evaluating navigational surrogate formats with divergent browsing tasks. Proceedings of Computer Human Interaction 2005 Extended, 1537-1540.
25. Marchionini, G. (1997). Information seeking in electronic environments. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Marshall, C. C., & Shipman, F. M. (1994). VIKI: Spatial hypertext supporting emergent structure. Proceedings of European Conference on Hypertext Technology 94, 13-23.
27. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002, March). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 87-99.
28. Mobley, M. I., Doares, L. M., & Mumford, M. D. (1992). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 125-155.
29. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Maher, M. A., Costanza, D. P., & Supinski, E. P. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: IV. Category combination. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 59-71.
30. Oxford English dictionary (2nd ed.). (1992). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
31. Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1999, October). Information foraging. Psychological Review, 106(4), 643-675.
32. Rothenberg, A. (1979). The emerging goddess. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Russell, D. M., Stefik, M. J., Pirolli, P., & Card, S. K. (1993). The cost structure of sensemaking. Proceedings of the INTERCHI 93, 269-276.
34. Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., & Vargas-Hernandez, N. (2003). Metrics for measuring ideation effectiveness. Design Studies, 24(2), 111-134.
35. Shah, J. J., Smith, S. M., Vargas-Hernandez, N., Gerkens, R., & Wulan, M. (2003). Empirical studies of design ideation: Alignment of design experiments with laboratory experiments. Proceedings of Am Soc Mechanical Engineering International Conference on Design Theory and Methodology, 1-10.
36. Shneiderman, B., & Plaisant, C. (2006). Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: multi- dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. Proceedings of BELIV '06: AVI 2006 Workshop on Beyond Time and Errors, 1-7.
37. Smith, E. E., Osherson, D. N., Rips, L. J., & Keane, M. (1988). Combining prototypes: A selective modification model. Cognitive Science, 12, 485-527.
38. Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (1995). The creative cognition approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
39. Thagard, P. (1984). Conceptual combination and scientific discovery. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, 3-12.
40. White, R. W., Kules, B., Drucker, S. M., & schraefel, m. c. (2006, April). Supporting exploratory search. Communications of the ACM, 49(4), 36-39.
41. Wildemuth, B., Marchionini, G., Yang, M., Geisler, G., Wilkens, T., Hughes, A., et al. (2003). How fast is too fast? Evaluating fast forward surrogates for digital video. Proceedings of ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries 2003, 221-230.
42. Wilkenfeld, M. J., & Ward, T. B. (2001). Similarity and emergence in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 21-38.
43. Wisniewski, E. J. (1996). Construal and similarity in conceptual combination. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 434-453.
44. Wisniewski, E. J. (1997). When concepts combine. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 167-183.
45. Woodruff, A. Rosenholtz, R., Morrison, J., Faulring, A., & Pirolli, P. (2002). A comparison of the use of text summaries, plain thumbnails, and enhanced thumbnails for Web search tasks. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(2), 172-185.