Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: IV. Category combination

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 59-71

  Mumford, Michael D ^a,c   Baughman, Wayne A ^a   Maher, Michelle A ^b   Costanza, David P ^b   Supinski, Elizabeth P ^b  

^a AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c AMERICAN INSTITUTES FOR RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0009588599     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15326934crj1001_7     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Arieti, S. (1976). Creativity: The magic synthesis. New York: Basic Books.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211-227.
3. Basadur, M. S., Graen, G. B., & Green, G. B. (1982). Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding in an applied research organization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 612-617.
4. Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process-analytic models of creative capacities: Operations influencing the combination-and-reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37-62.
5. Bejar, I. I., Chaffin, R., & Embretson, S. (1991). Cognitive and psychometric analysis of analogical problem solving. New York: Springer-Verlag.
6. Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. J. (1987). Relation element theory: A new account of the representation and processing of semantic relations. In D. Gorfein & R. Hoffman (Eds.), Memory and tearning: The Ebbinghaus centennial conference (pp. 169-201). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
7. Chaffin, R., & Herrmann, D. J. (1988). The nature of semantic relations: A comparison of two approaches. In M. Evens (Ed.), Relational models of the lexicon: Representing knowledge in semantic networks (pp. 58-83). New York: Cambridge University Press.
8. Crouch, T. D. (1992). Why Witbur and Orville? Some thoughts on the Wright brothers and the process of invention. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 80-92). New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Davidson, J. E. (1995). The suddenness of insight. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 125-155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Ghiselin, B. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In C. W. Taylor & F. Barron (Eds.), Scientific creativity: Its recognition and development (pp. 30-43). New York: Wiley.
12. Greeno, J. G., & Simon, H. A. (1988). Problem solving and reasoning. In R. C. Atkinson, R. J. Hernstein, G. Lindzey, & R. D. Luce (Eds.), Steven's handbook of experimental psychology (pp. 589-672). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
13. Kelly, M. H., & Keil, F. C. (1985). The more things change ...: Metamorphoses and conceptual structure. Cognitive Science, 9, 403-416.
14. Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. New York: Macmillan.
15. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Maier, N. R. F., & Burke, R. J. (1970). Studies in creativity II: Influence of motivation in the reorganization of experience. In N. R. F. Maier (Ed.), Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups (pp. 34-43). Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
17. Maier, N. R. F., & Thurber, J. (1970). Studies in creativity IV: Appearance of fragmentation and reorganization in meaningfully associated units. In N. R. F. Maier (Ed.), Problem solving and creativity in individuals and groups (pp. 50-61). Belmont, CA: Brooks-Cole.
18. Mobley, M. I., Doares, L. M., & Mumford, M. D. (1992). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Evidence for the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 5, 125-155.
19. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., & Sager, C. E. (in press). Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative thinking. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
20. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Supinski, E. P., Costanza, D. P., & Threlfall, K. V. (1993). Cognitive and metacognitive skill development: Alternative measures for predicting leadership potential (Rep. No. SBIR A92-154, U.S. Army Research Institute for Behavioral and Social Sciences). Bethesda, MD: Management Research Institute.
21. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., Threlfall, K. V., Supinski, E. P., & Costanza, D. P. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: I. Problem construction. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 63-76.
22. Mumford, M. D., & Connelly, M. S. (1993). Cases of invention: A review of Weber and Perkins' Inventive minds: Creativity in Technology. Contemporary Psychology, 38, 1210-1212.
23. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
24. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122.
25. Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Threlfall, K. V., & Baughman, W. A. (1996). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: III. Category selection. Creativity Research Journal, 9, 395-406.
26. Osborn, A. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner's.
27. Owens, W. A. (1969). Cognitive, noncognitive, and environmental correlates of mechanical ingenuity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 53, 199-208.
28. Perkins, D. N. (1992). The topography of invention. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 238-250). New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Redmond, M. R., Mumford, M. D., & Teach, R. (1993). Putting creativity to work: Effects of leader behavior on subordinate creativity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 120-151.
30. Rothenberg, A. (1973). Word association and creativity. Psychological Reports, 33, 3-12.
31. Rothenberg, A. (1986). Artistic creation as stimulated by superimposed versus combined-composite visual images. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 370-381.
32. Rothenberg, A., & Sobel, R. S. (1980). Creation of literary metaphors as stimulated by superimposed versus separated visual images. Journal of Mental Imagery, 4, 37-91.
33. Runco, M. A., & Charles, R. (1993). Judgments of originality and appropriateness as predictors of creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 537-546.
34. Shapiro, S. I., & Palermo, D. S. (1970). Conceptual categorization and class membership: Normative data for representatives of 100 categories. Psychonomic Monograph Supplements, 3, 107-127.
35. Simonton, D. K. (1990). Psychology, science & history: An introduction to historiometry. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Simonton, D. K. (1995). Foresight in insight? A Darwinian perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The nature of insight (pp. 465-494). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1991). An investment theory of creativity and its development. Human Development, 34, 1-31.
38. Suler, J. R. (1980). Primary process thinking and creativity. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 144-165.
39. Tourangeau, R., & Rips, L. (1991). Interpreting and evaluating metaphors. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 452-472.
40. Tourangeau, R., & Sternberg, R. J. (1982). Understanding and appreciating metaphors. Cognition, 11, 203-244.
41. Tweney, R. D. (1992). Inventing the field: Michael Faraday and the creative "engineering" of electromagnetic field theory. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 31-47). New York: Oxford University Press.
42. Weber, R. J. (1992). Stone age knife to Swiss army knife: An invention prototype. In R. J. Weber & D. N. Perkins (Eds.), Inventive minds: Creativity in technology (pp. 217-237). New York: Oxford University Press.
43. Zwicky, F. (1957). Morphological astronomy. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.