Event-related brain indices of Japanese scrambling

Brain and Language

Volumn 86, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 243-271

  Ueno, Mieko ^a   Kluender, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Anterior negativity; Canonical word order; ERP; Event related brain potential; Filler gap dependency; Head driven parser; Japanese sentence processing; LAN; P600; Scrambling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JAPAN; LANGUAGE; NORMAL HUMAN;

EID: 0043063930     PISSN: 0093934X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0093-934X(02)00543-6     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bader M., Lasser I. German verb-final clauses and sentence processing: Evidence for immediate attachment. Clifton C., Frazier L., Rayner K. Perspectives on sentence processing. 1994;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
2. Basilico, D., Piñar, P., & Anton-Méndez, I. (1995) Canonical word order and the processing of verbal traces in Spanish., The Proceedings of the eighth annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Tucson, Arizona.
3. Caplan D., Alpert N., Waters G. Effects of syntactic structure and propositional number on patterns of regional cerebral blood flow. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 10(4):1998;541-552.
4. Caplan D., Alpert N., Waters G. PET studies of syntactic processing with auditory sentence presentation. Neuroimage. 9(3):1999;43-51.
5. Caplan D., Alpert N., Waters G., Olivieri A. Activation of Broca's area by syntactic processing under conditions of concurrent articulation. Human Brain Mapping. 9(2):2000;65-71.
6. Caplan D., Vijayan S., Kuperberg G., West C., Waters G., Greve D., Dale A.M. Vascular responses to syntactic processing: Event-related fMRI study of relative clauses. Human Brain Mapping. 15:2002;26-38.
7. Comrie B. Language universals and linguistic typology. 1981;The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
8. Cooke A., Zurif E.B., DeVita C., Alsop D., Koenig P., Detre J., Gee J., Pinango M., Balogh J., Grossman M. Neural basis for sentence comprehension: Grammatical and short-term memory components. Human Brain Mapping. 15:2002;80-94.
9. De Vincenzi M. Filler-gap dependencies in a null subject language: Referential and nonreferential WHs. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 20:1991;197-213.
10. Fiebach C.J., Schlesewsky M., Friederici A.D. Syntactic working memory and the establishment of filler-gap dependencies: Insights from ERPs and fMRI. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 30:2001;321-338.
11. Fodor J.D. Parsing strategies and constraints on transformations. Linguistic Inquiry. 9:1978;427-473.
12. Frazier L., Clifton C. Successive cyclicity in the grammar and the parser. Language and Cognitive Processes. 4:1989;93-126.
13. Garnsey, S., Yamashita, H., Ito, K. & McClure, M. (2001) What when the verb at the end is happens? An ERP study of Japanese sentence comprehension. Poster session presented at the 14th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Philadelphia, PA.
14. Gibson E. Linguistic complexity: Locality of syntactic dependencies. Cognition. 68:1998;1-76.
15. Hagoort P., Brown C., Groothusen J. The syntactic positive shift (SPS) as an ERP measure of syntactic processing. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8(4):1993;439-483.
16. Holmes V.M., O'Regan J.K. Eye fixation patterns during the reading of relative clause sentences. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 20:1981;417-430.
17. Inoue A., Fodor J.D. Information-paced parsing of Japanese. Mazuka R., Nagata N. Japanese sentence processing. 1995;Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
18. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A. A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review. 99:1992;122-149.
19. Just M.A., Carpenter P.A., Keller T.A., Eddy W.F., Thulborn K.R. Brain activation modulated by sentence comprehension. Science. 274:1996;114-116.
20. Kaan E., Harris A., Gibson E., Holcomb P. The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes. 15(2):2000;159-201.
21. Keppel G. Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook. 1982;Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
22. King J.W., Just M.A. Individual differences in syntactic processing: The role of working memory. Journal of Memory and Language. 30:1991;580-602.
23. King J.W., Kutas M. Who did what to when?: Using word- and clause-level ERPs to monitor working memory usage in reading. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 7(3):1995;376-395.
24. Kluender R., Kutas M. Bridging the gap: Evidence from ERPs on the processing of unbounded dependencies. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 5(2):1993;196-214.
25. Kluender R., Kutas M. Subjacency as a processing phenomenon. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8(4):1993;573-633.
26. Kluender, R., Münte, T. F. (1998). ERPs to grammatical and ungrammatical wh-questions in German: Subject/object asymmetries. Poster session presented at the 11th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Newark, NJ.
27. Love T., Swinney D. The influence of canonical word order on structural processing. Syntax and Semantics. 31:1998;153-166.
28. MacWhinney B., Pleh Cs. The processing of restrictive relative in Hungarian. Cognition. 29:1988;95-141.
29. Mahajan, A. K. (1992). The A/Ā -distinction and movement theory. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
30. Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2001) Event-related potentials for scrambled word order in Japanese. Poster session presented at the 14th Annual CUNY Conference on Human Sentence Processing, Philadelphia, PA.
31. Mazuka, R., Itoh, K., & Kondo, T. (2002). Cost of scrambling in Japanese sentence processing. In M. Nakayama (Ed.), Papers from International East Asian Psycholinguistics Workshop, Center for the Study of Language and Information, Stanford, CA.
32. Müller H., King J.W., Kutas M. Event related potentials elicited by spoken relative clauses. Cognitive Brain Research. 5:1997;193-203.
33. Münte T.F., Schwirtz O., Wieringa B.M., Matzke M., Johannes S. Elektrophysiologie komplexer Sätze: Erignskorrelierte Potentiale auf der Wort- und Satzebene. EEG-EMG. 28:1997;11-17.
34. Münte T.F., Schiltz K., Kutas M. When temporal terms belie conceptual order. Nature. 395:1998;71-73.
35. Nakagome K., Takazawa S., Kanno O., Hagiwara H., Nakajima H., Ito K., Koshida I. A topographical study of ERP correlates of semantic and syntactic violations in the Japanese language using the multichannel EEG system. Psychophysiology. 38:2001;304-315.
36. Nicol J.L. Reconsidering reactivation. Altmann G.T.M., Shillcock R. Cognitive models of speech processing: The second Sperlonga meeting. 1993;321-347 Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
37. Osterhout L., Holcomb P.J. Event-related brain potentials elicited by syntactic anomaly. Journal of Memory and Language. 31:1992;785-806.
38. Pechmann, T., Uszkoreit, H., Engelkamp, J., & Zerbst, D. (1994) Word order in the German middle field. Report 43, Computational Linguistics at the University of Saarland.
39. Phillips, C., Kazanina, N., Wong, K. & Ellis, R. (2001) ERP evidence on the time course of processing demands in wh-dependencies. Poster session presented at the 14th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Philadelphia, PA.
40. Pickering M., Barry G. Sentence processing without empty categories. Language and Cognitive Processes. 6(3):1991;229-259.
41. Pickering M. Direct association and sentence processing: A reply to Gorrell and to Gibson and Hickok. Language and Cognitive Processes. 8(2):1993;163-196.
42. Pritchett B. Grammatical competence and parsing performance. 1992;The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
43. Rösler F., Pechmann T., Streb J., Röder B., Hennighausen E. Parsing of sentences in a language with varying word order: Word-by-word variations of processing demands are revealed by event-related brain potentials. Journal of Memory and Language. 38(n2):1998;150-176.
44. Saito, M. (1985). Some asymmetries in Japanese and their theoretical implications. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
45. Saito M. Long distance scrambling in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics. 1:1992;69-118.
46. Schlesewsky M., Franselow G., Kliegl R., Krems J. The subject preference in the processing of locally ambiguous wh-questions in German. Hemforth B., Konieczny L. German sentence processing. 2000;65-93 Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht, Netherlands.
47. Stamenov M., Andonova A. Lexical access and co-reference processing in Bulgarian. Hillert D. Cross linguistic studies of language processing. 1997;Academic Press, San Diego.
48. Stromswold K., Caplan D., Alpert N., Rauch S. Localization of syntactic comprehension by positron emission tomography. Brain and Language. 52(3):1996;452-473.
49. Uehara, K. & Bradley, D. (1998). Processing scrambled argument structures in Japanese. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, New York.
50. Urbach, T. P. (1993). Access to non-syntactic information during parsing: Evidence from event-related potentials (ERPs) in garden-path sentences. Poster session presented at the 6th annual CUNY conference on human sentence processing, Amherst, MA.
51. Welbelhuth, G. (1989). Syntactic saturation phenomena and the modern germanic languages. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts.
52. Yamashita H. The effects of word-order and case marking information on the processing of Japanese. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research. 26(2):1997;163-188.
53. Yamashita, H. (in press). Scrambled sentences in Japanese: Linguistic properties and motivations for production, TEXT.