Estimation of most probable number Salmonella populations on commercial North Carolina turkey farms

Journal of Applied Poultry Research

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 700-708

  Santos, F B O ^a   Li, X ^a   Payne, J B ^a   Sheldon, B W ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Farm; Feces; Litter; Salmonella population; Turkey

Indexed keywords

AVES; MELEAGRIS GALLOPAVO; SALMONELLA;

EID: 29744460071     PISSN: 10566171     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/japr/14.4.700     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Tauxe, R. V. 1991. Salmonella: A postmodern pathogen. J. Food Prot. 54:563-568.
2. Hoszowski, A., A. D. E. Fraser, B. W. Brooks, and E. M. Riche. 1996. Rapid detection and enumeration of Salmonella in chicken carcass rinses using filtration, enrichment and colony blot immunoassay. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 28:341-350.
3. Byrd, J. A., D. E. Corrier, J. R. DeLoach, and D. J. Nisbet. 1997. Comparison of drag-swab environmental protocols for the isolation of Salmonella in poultry houses. Avian Dis. 41:709-713.
4. Cox, N. A., N. J. Stern, S. E. Craven, M. E. Berrang, and M. T. Musgrove. 2000. Prevalence of Campylobacter and Salmonella in the cecal droppings of turkeys during production. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 9:542-545.
5. Ashton, W. L. G. 1990. Enterobacteriaceae. Pages 11-41 in Poultry Diseases. F. T. W. Jordon, ed. Bailliere Tindall, Philadelphia, PA.
6. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service. 1998. Farm-to-table safety system; Salmonella enteritidis contamination, control and reduction. Fed. Regist. 63:27502-27511.
7. Kiessling, C. R., J. H. Cutting, M. Loftis, W. M. Kiessling, A. R. Datta, and J. N. Sofos. 2002. Antimicrobial resistance of food-related Salmonella isolates, 1999-2000. J. Food Prot. 65:603-608.
8. Bryan, F. L., and M. P. Doyle. 1995. Health risks and consequences of Salmonella and Campylobacter jejuni in raw poultry. J. Food Prot. 58:326-344.
9. Bains, B. S., and M. A. MacKenzie. 1974. Transmission of Salmonella through an integrated poultry operation. Poult. Sci. 53:1114-1118.
10. Read, S. C., R. J. Irwin, C. Poppe, and J. Harris. 1994. A comparison of two methods for isolation of Salmonella from poultry littler samples. Poult. Sci. 73:1617-1621.
11. Nayak, R., P. B. Kenney, J. Keswani, and C. Ritz. 2003. Isolation and characterization of Salmonella in a turkey production facility. Br. Poult. Sci. 44:192-202.
12. de Rezende, C. E., E. T. Mallinson, N. L. Tablante, R. Morales, A. Park, L. E. Carr, and S. W. Joseph. 2001. Effect of dry litter and airflow in reducing Salmonella and Escherichia coli populations in the broiler production environment. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 10:245-251.
13. Mallinson, E. T., C. E. de Rezende, N. L. Tablante, L. E. Carr, and S. W. Joseph. 2000. A management technique to identify prime locations of Salmonella contamination on broiler and layer farms. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 9:364-370.
14. Fisher Scientific Int., Bohemia, NY.
15. Omega Engineering Inc., Stamford, CT.
16. Pope, M. J., and T. E. Cherry. 2000. An evaluation of the presence of pathogens on broilers raised on Poultry Litter Treatment®-treated litter. Poult. Sci. 79:1351-1355.
17. Drägerwerk Aktiengesellschaft, Lubeck, Germany.
18. Spiral Biotech Inc., Norwood, MA.
19. Oxoid Ltd., Ogdensburg, NY.
20. IUL Instruments, S.A., Barcelona, Spain.
21. Wiberg, C., and P. Norberg. 1996. Comparison between a cultural procedure using Rappaport-Vassiliadis broth and motility enrichments on modified semi-solid Rappaport-Vassiliadis medium for Salmonella detection from food and feed. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 29:353-360.
22. Moriñigo, M. A., J. J. Borrego, and P. Romero. 1986. Comparative study of different methods for detection and enumeration of Salmonella spp. in natural waters. J. Appl. Bacteriol. 61:169-176.
23. Sinell, H. J., O. Pietzsch, H. Klingbeil, and M. Benner. 1990. Estimation of most probable number of Salmonella in retail samples of minced pork. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 11:135-142.
24. Tate, C. R., and G. Miller. 1990. The isolation of salmonellae from poultry environmental samples by several enrichment procedures using plating media with and without novobiocin. Poult. Sci. 69:721-726.
25. Davison, S., C. E. Benson, and R. J. Eckroade. 1995. Comparison of environmental monitoring protocols for the detection of Salmonella in poultry houses. Avian Dis. 39:475-479.
26. Dufrenne, J., W. Ritmeester, E. D. Asch, F. Leusden, and R. Jonge. 2001. Quantification of the contamination of chicken and chicken products in The Netherlands with Salmonella and Campylobacter. J. Food Prot. 64:538-541.
27. Voogt, N., M. Raes, W. J. B. Wannet, A. M. Henken, and A. W. van de Giessen. 2001. Comparison of selective enrichment media for the detection of Salmonella in poultry faeces. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 32:89-92.
28. Martin, S. A., and M. A. McCann. 1998. Microbiological survey of Georgia poultry litter. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 7:90-98.
29. Difco. Division of Becton Dickinson and Co., Sparks, MD.
30. Blodgett, R. 2001. Most probable number from serial dilutions Appendix 2. Bacteriological analytical manual online. http://cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam?bam-a2. html Accessed Mar. 2003.
31. Swanson, K. M. J., R. L. Petran, and J. H. Hanlin. 2001. Culture methods for enumeration of microorganisms. Pages 53-62 in Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods. 4th ed. F. P. Downes, and K. Ito, ed. Am. Public Health Assoc., Washington, DC.
32. 2 and r values, respectively).
33. SAS Institute Inc. 1996. SAS/STAT User's guide, Version 6, 4th ed., vol. 2. SAS Proprietary Software Release 8.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
34. Beli, E., A. Telo, and E. Duraku. 2001. Salmonella serotypes isolated from turkey meat in Albania. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 63:165-167.
35. Andrews, W. H., and T. S. Hammack. 2003. Salmonella. Chapter 5 in Bacteriological Analytical Manual Online, Chapter 5. http://cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/ bam-5.html Accessed Nov. 2005. Food and Drug Admin., Rockville, MD.
36. The MPN and prevalence results were examined using the chi-squared frequency analysis procedure of SAS, and variables were considered to be significant at P < 0.05.
37. Blue M, Atlanta, GA.
38. Decagon Devices Inc., Pullman, WA.
39. Corning Inc., Corning, NY.
40. 2 and r values, respectively).
41. Kristensen, H. H., and C. M. Wathers. 2000. Ammonia and poultry welfare: A review. World's Poult. Sci. J. 56:235-245.
42. Payne, J. B., E. C. Kroger, and S. E. Watkins. 2002. Evaluation of litter treatments on Salmonella recovery from poultry litter. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 11:239-243.
43. Himathongkham, S., S. Nuanualsuwan, and H. Riemann. 1999. Survival of Salmonella enteritidis and Salmonella typhimurium in chicken manure at different levels of water activity. FEMS Microbiol. Let. 172:159-163.
44. Hayes, J. R., L. E. Carr, E. T. Mallinson, L. W. Douglass, and S. W. Joseph. 2000. Characterization of the contribution of water activity and moisture content to the population distribution of Salmonella spp. in commercial poultry houses. Poult. Sci. 79:1557-1561.
45. Williams, J. E. 1978. Recent literature on detection of salmonellae in poultry production flocks: A critical review. Avian Pathol. 7:1-14.
46. Christian, J. H., and W. J. Scoot. 1953. Water relations of salmonellae at 30 degrees C. Austr. J. Biol. Sci. 6:565-573.