Political Ads and citizen communication

Communication Research

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 423-451

  Cho, Jaeho ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Campaign media; Deliberation; Political advertising; Political talk; Voter mobilization

Indexed keywords

EID: 46249102906     PISSN: 00936502     EISSN: 15523810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093650208315976     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How attack ads shrink and polarize the electorate. New York: Free Press.
2. Ansolabehere, S., Iyengar, S., & Simon, A. (1999). Replicating experiments using aggregate and survey data: The case of negative advertising and turnout. American Political Science Review, 93, 901-909.
3. Barber, B. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
4. Barber, J.S., Murphy, S.A., Axinn, W.G., & Maples, J. (2000). Discrete-time multilevel hazard analysis. Sociological Methodology, 30, 201-235.
5. Bennett, W.L. (2005). News: The politics of illusion. New York: Longman.
6. Chaffee, S.H., Zhao, X., & Leshner, G. (1994). Political knowledge and the campaign media of 1992. Communication Research, 21, 305-324.
7. Danowski, J.A., & Ruchinskas, J.E. (1983). Period, cohort, and aging effects: A study of television exposure in presidential election campaigns, 1952-1980. Communications Research, 10, 77-96.
8. Demers, D.P. (1994). The relative constancy hypothesis, structural pluralism and national advertising expenditures. Journal of Media Economics, 7 (4). 31-48.
9. Freedman, P., & Goldstein, K. (1999). Measuring media exposure and the effects of negative campaign ads. American Journal of Political Science, 43 (4). 1189-1208.
10. Gans, H. (1980). Deciding what's news: A study of CBS Evening News, NBC Nightly News, Newsweek, and Time. New York: Vintage Books.
11. Garramone, G.M., Atkin, C.K., Pinkleton, B.E., & Cole, R.C. (1990). Effects of negative political advertising on the political process. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34 (3). 299-311.
12. Goldstein, K., & Freedman, P. (2002). Lessons learned: Campaign advertising in the 2000 elections. Political Communication, 19 (1). 5-28.
13. Hayes, A. (2006). A primer on multilevel modeling. Human Communication Research, 32, 385-410.
14. Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Huckfeldt, R., Sprague, J., & Levine, J. (2000). The dynamic of collective deliberation in the 1996 election: Campaign effects on accessibility, certainty, and accuracy. American Political Science Review, 94, 641-651.
16. Iyengar, S., & Petrocik, J.R. (2000). "Basic rule" voting: Impact of campaigns on party- and approval-based voting. In J. A. Thurber, C. J. Nelson, & D. A. Dulio (Eds.), Crowded airwaves: Campaign advertising in elections (pp. 113-148). Washington, DC: Brookings.
17. Jamieson, K.H. (1993). Dirty politics: Deception, distraction, and democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
18. Johnston, R., Hagen, M., & Jamieson, K.H. (2004). The 2000 presidential election and the foundations of party politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Just, M.R., Crigler, A.N., Alger, D.E., Cook, T.E., Kern, M., & West, D.M. (1996). Crosstalk: Citizens, candidates, and the media in a presidential campaign. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Kahn, K.F., & Kenney, P. (1999). Do negative campaigns mobilize or suppress turnout? Clarifying the relationship between negativity and participation. American Political Science Review, 93, 877-890.
21. Katz, E., Gurevitch, M., & Haas, H. (1973). On the use of the media for important things. American Sociological Review, 38, 164-181.
22. Kim, J., Wyatt, R.O., & Katz, E. (1999). News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication, 16, 361-385.
23. King, G., Honaker, J., Joseph, A., & Scheve, K. (2001). Analyzing incomplete political science data: An alternative algorithm for multiple imputation. American Political Science Review, 95, 49-69.
24. Lau, R.R., Sigelman, L., & Babbitt, P. (1999). The effects of negative political advertisements: A meta-analytic assessment. American Political Science Review, 93, 851-875.
25. Martin, P.S. (2004). Inside the black box of negative campaign effects: Three reasons why negative campaigns mobilize. Political Psychology, 25 (4). 545-562.
26. McClurg, S.D. (2004). Indirect mobilization: The social consequences of party contacts in an election campaign. American Politics Research, 32 (4). 406-443.
27. McLeod, J.M., Scheufele, D.A., Moy, P., Horowitz, E.M., Holbert, R.L., Zhang, W., et al. (1999). Understanding deliberation: The effects of discussion networks on participation in a public forum. Communication Research, 26, 743-774.
28. Meirick, P.C. (2005). Political knowledge and sponsorship in backlash from party- and candidate-sponsored attacks. Communication Reports, 18, 75-84.
29. Morley, D. (1992). Television, audiences and cultural studies. London: Routledge.
30. Neuman, W.R., Just, M.R., & Crigler, A.N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Olien, C.N., Donohue, G.A., & Tichenor, P.J. (1978). Community structure and media use. Journalism Quarterly, 55, 445-455.
32. Page, B.I. (1996). Who deliberates? Mass media in modern democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. Pan, Z., & McLeod, J.M. (1991). Multi-level analysis in mass communication research. Communication Research, 18, 140-173.
34. Pan, Z., Shen, L., Paek, H., & Sun, Y. (2006). Mobilizing political talk in a presidential campaign: An examination of campaign effects in a deliberative framework. Communication Research, 33, 315-345.
35. Patterson, T.E., & McClure, R.D. (1976). The unseeing eye: The myth of television power in national politics. New York: Paragon Books.
36. Pinkleton, B.E. (1998). Effects of print comparative political advertising on political decision-making and participation. Journal of Communication, 48 (4). 24-36.
37. Popkin, S.L. (1994). The reasoning voter: Communication and persuasion in presidential campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A.S. (1986). A hierarchical model for studying school effects. Sociology of Education, 59 (1). 1-17.
39. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A.S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
40. Rosenstone, S.J., & Hansen, J.M. (1993). Mobilization, participation and democracy in America. New York: Macmillan.
41. Rubin, A.M. (1994). Media uses and effects: A uses and gratifications perspective. In J. Bryant & D. Zillman (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 417-436). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
42. Shah, D.V., Cho, J., Eveland, W.P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling Internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32, 531-565.
43. Shah, D.V., & Scheufele, D.A. (2006). Opinion leaders as information seekers: Communication pathways to civic participation. Political Communication, 23 (1). 1-22.
44. Southwell, B.G., & Yzer, M.C. (2007). The roles of interpersonal communication in mass media campaigns. Communication Yearbook, 31, 419-462.
45. Tichenor, P.J., Donohue, G.A., & Olien, C.N. (1970). Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 159-170.
46. Valentino, N.A., Hutchings, V.L., & White, I.K. (2002). Cues that matter: How political ads prime racial attitudes during campaigns. American Political Science Review, 96, 75-90.
47. Wyatt, R.O., Katz, E., & Kim, J. (2000). Bridging the spheres: Political and personal conversation in public and private spaces. Journal of Communication, 50, 71-92.