Understanding individual investor's behavior with financial information disclosed on the web sites

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 27, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 219-227

  Lee, Kun Chang ^a   Chung, Namho ^b   Kang, Inwon ^c  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b Chungju National University   (South Korea)

^c Kyung Hee University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Financial information; Individual investor; Investment; Structural equation model; Web sites

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; EXPOSURE CONTROLS; FINANCE; INTERNET; INVESTMENTS; SURVEYS;

DECISION QUALITY; DECISION SUPPORTS; FINANCIAL INFORMATION; INDIVIDUAL (PSS 544-7); INFORMATION QUALITY (IQ); INTEGRAL PART; PERCEIVED EASE OF USE (PEOU); PERCEIVED USEFULNESS (PU); QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL (TAM); WEB SITE;

WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 46149090397     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290601138146     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. AHIRE, S.L., GOLHAR, D.Y. and WALLER, M.A., 1996, Development and valuation of quality management implementation constructs. Decision Sciences, 27, pp. 3 - 56.
2. AJZEN, I. and FISHBEIN, M., 1980, Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
3. ANDERSON, J.C. and GERBING, D.W., 1982, Some methods for respecifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measures. Academy of Management Review, 19, pp. 47 - 59.
4. BENBASAT, I., DEXTER, A. and TODD P., 1986, An experimental program investigating color-enhanced and graphical information presentation: an integration of findings. Communications of the ACM, 29, pp. 1094 - 1105.
5. BHATTACHERJEE, A., 2000, Acceptance of e-commerce services: the case of electronic brokerage. IEEE Transaction on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics-Part A: Systems and Humans, 30, pp. 411 - 420.
6. BOHMSTEDT, G.W., 1970, Reliability and validity assessment in attitude measurement. In Attitude Measurement, G.F. Summers (Ed.), pp. 80 - 99 (Chicago, IL: Rand McNally).
7. BOLLEN, K.A., 1989, Structural Equations with Latent Variables (New York: John Wiley & Sons).
8. BOOMSMA, A., 1982, The robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In Systems under Indirect Observation: Causality, Structure, Prediction, K.G. Jorekog and H. Wold (Eds), pp. 149 - 173 (Amsterdam: North Holland).
9. CHAU, P.Y.K., 1993, Decision support using traditional simulation and visual interactive simulation. Information and Decision Technologies, 19, pp. 63 - 76.
10. CHAU, P.Y.K., 1996, An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, pp. 185 - 204.
11. CHAU, P.Y.K. and HU, P.J., 2002, Examining a model of information technology acceptance by individual professionals: an exploratory study. Journal of Management Information Systems, 18, pp. 191 - 229.
12. CORDELLA, T. and YEYATI, E.L., 2002, Financial opening, deposit insurance, and risk in a model of banking competition. European Economic Review, 46, pp. 471 - 485.
13. DAVIS, F.D., 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, pp. 319 - 340.
14. DAVIS, F.D., BAGOZZI, R.P. and WARSHAW, P.R., 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical model. Management Science, 35, pp. 982 - 1003.
15. DEVARAJ, S., FAN, M. and KOHLI, R., 2002, Antecedents of B2C channel satisfaction and preference: Validating e-commerce metrics. Information Systems Research, 13, pp. 316 - 333.
16. DUFWENBERG, M. and GNEEZY, U., 2002, Information disclosure in auctions: an experiment. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 48, pp. 431 - 444.
17. ECKERSON, W., 1992, Managers look to multimedia future. Network World, 9, pp. 25 - 31.
18. ESO, P. and SZENTES, B., 2002, Optimal Information Disclosure in Auctions: The Handicap Auction, Northwestern University, CMS-EMS Discussion Paper #1352.
19. ETTREDGE, M., RICHARDSON, V.J. and SCHOLZ, S., 2001, The presentation of financial information at corporate web sites. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 2, pp. 149 - 168.
20. FASB, 2000, Business Reporting Research Project: Electronic Distribution of Business Information (Norwalk, CT: Financial Accounting Standards Board).
21. FISHBEIN, M. and AJZEN, I., 1975, Belief Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research (Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley).
22. FORNELL, C. and LARCKER, D.F., 1981, Evaluating structural equation models with unobervables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 39 - 50.
23. GEFEN, D., KARAHANNA, E. and STRAUB, D.W., 2003, Trust and TAM in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27, pp. 51 - 90.
24. GRAVES, O., FLESHER, D. and JORDAN, R., 1996, Pictures and the bottom line: the television epistemology of US annual reports. Accounting Organization Society, 21, pp. 57 - 88.
25. GRIFFIN, R.W., 1990, Management, 3rd edition (Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin).
26. HAIR, J.F., ANDERSON, R.E., TATHAM, R.L. and BLACK, W.C., 1995, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, 4th edition (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall).
27. HIRSHLEIFER, D. and TEOH, S.H., 2002, Limited Attention, Information Disclosure, and Financial Reporting, Working Paper, Ohio State University.
28. HOPWOOD, A., 1996, Introduction. Accounting, Organization, Society, 21, pp. 55 - 56.
29. HUANG, A.H. and WINDSOR J.C., 1998, An empirical assessment of a multimedia executive support system. Information & Management, 33, pp. 251 - 262.
30. IGBARIA, M., GUIMARAES, T. and DAVIS, G.B., 1995a, Testing the determinants of microcomputer usage via a structural equation model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 11, pp. 87 - 114.
31. IGBARIA, M., IIVARI, J. and MARAGAHH, H., 1995b, Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information & Management, 29, pp. 227 - 238.
32. JARVENPAA, S.L. and TODD, P.A., 1997, Consumer reactions to electronic shopping on the World Wide Web. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1, pp. 59 - 88.
33. KIDA, T., SMITH, J. and MALETTA, M., 1998, The effects of encoded memory traces for numerical data on accounting decision making. Accounting, Organization, Society, 23, pp. 451 - 466.
34. LEDERER, A.L., MAUPIN, D.J., SENA, M.P. and ZHUANG, Y., 2000, The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web. Decision Support Systems, 29, pp. 269 - 282.
35. LEWELLEN, W.G., PARK, T. and RO, B.T., 1996, Self-serving behavior in managers' discretionary information disclosure decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 21, pp. 227 - 251.
36. LIM, K.H. and BENBASAT, I., 2000, The effect of multimedia on perceived equivocality and perceived usefulness of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 24, pp. 449 - 471.
37. LOHSE, G.L. and SPILLER, P., 1998, Quantifying the effect of user interface design features on cyberstore traffic and sales. In CHI'98 Conference Proceedings, 18 - 23 April 1998, Los Angeles, CA, J. Coutaz and J. Karat (Eds.).
38. LYMER, A., DEBRECENY, R., GRAY, G. and RAHMAN, A., 1999, Business Reporting on the Internet London, International Accounting Standards Committee.
39. MCKINSTRY, S., 1996, Designing the annual report of Burton PLC from 1930 to 1994. Accounting, Organization, Society, 21, pp. 89 - 111.
40. MCKNIGHT, D.H., CHOUDHURY, V. and KACMAR, C., 2002, Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13, pp. 334 - 359.
41. MONTAZEMI, A.R., CAMERON, D.A. and GUPTA, K.M., 1996, An empirical study of factors affecting software package selection. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13, pp. 89 - 115.
42. MOON, J.W. and KIM, Y.G., 2001, Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web context. Information & Management, 38, pp. 217 - 230.
43. MORI, P.A., 1996, Financial information disclosure, union power and integration. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2, pp. 283 - 299.
44. OZ, E. and WHITE, L., 1993, Multimedia for better training. Journal of Systems Management, 44, pp. 34 - 43.
45. PETTY, R. and CACCIOPPO, J., 1986, The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advanced Experimental Social Psychology, 19, pp. 123 - 205.
46. PITKOW, J.E. and KEHOE, C.M., 1996, Emerging trends in the WWW user population. Communications of the ACM, 39, pp. 106 - 108.
47. SEGARS, A.H. and GROVER, V., 1993, Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis. MIS Quarterly, 17, pp. 517 - 525.
48. TRITES, G., 1999, The impact of technology on financial and business reporting Toronto. Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants.
49. VENKATESH, V., 2000, Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11, pp. 342 - 365.
50. VENKATESH, V. and DAVIS, F.D., 2000, A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, pp. 186 - 204.
51. VENKATESH, V. and SPEIER, C., 2000, Creating an effective training environment for enhancing telework. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 52, 991 - 1005.
52. WATSON, C.J. and DRIVER, R.W., 1983, The influence of computer graphics on the recall of information. MIS Quarterly, 7, pp. 45 - 53.
53. XIA, W. and LEE, G., 2000, The influence of persuasion, training and experience on user perceptions and acceptance of IT innovation. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 371 - 384.