THE INFLUENCE OF PERSUASION, TRAINING, AND EXPERIENCE ON USER PERCEPTIONS AND ACCEPTANCE OF IT INNOVATION

Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2000

Volumn , Issue , 2000, Pages 371-384

  Xia, Weidong ^a   Lee, Gwanhoo ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION USE;

ACCEPTANCE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES; BELIEF AND ATTITUDES; CHANGE-OVER TIME; DIRECT USE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY USAGES; USER PERCEPTIONS; USERS' ACCEPTANCE;

INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

EID: 85024127111     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. Ajzen, I. “The Theory of Planned Behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (50:2), 1991, pp. 179-211.
2. Areni, C. S., and Lutz, R. J. “The Role of Argument Quality in the Elaboration Likelihood Model,” Advances in Consumer Research (15), 1988, pp. 197-203.
3. Agarwal, R., and Prasad, J. “The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies,” Decision Sciences (28:3), 1997, pp. 557-582.
4. Attewell, P. “Technology Diffusion and Organizational Learning: The Case of Business Computing,” Organization Science (3:1), 1992, pp. 1-19.
5. Bandura, A. “Self-Efficacy Mechanism in Human Agency,” American Psychologist (37:2), 1982, pp. 122-147.
6. Bandura, A. “Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change,” Psychological Review (84:2), 1977, pp. 191-215.
7. Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986.
8. Brembeck, W. L., and Howell, W. S. Persuasion, A Means of Social Influence, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1976.
9. Brown, L. A. Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective, New York: Methuen, 1981.
10. Cialdini, R. B., Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. “Attitude and Attitude Change,” Annual Review of Psychology, (32), 1981, pp. 357-404.
11. Cialdini, R. B., and Trost, M. R. “Social Influence: Social Norms, Conformity, and Compliance,” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 323-390.
12. Clark, P. Anglo-American Innovation, New York: Walter de Gruyter, 1987.
13. Davis, F. D. “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology,” MIS Quarterly (13:3), 1989, pp. 319-339.
14. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., and Warshaw, P. R. “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models,” Management Science (35:8), 1989, pp. 982-1003.
15. Davis, S., and Bostrom, R. P. “Training End Users to Compute: An Experimental Investigation of the Roles of the Computer Interface and Training Method,” MIS Quarterly (17:1), 1993, pp. 61-85.
16. DeLone, W. H. “Determinants of Success for Computer Usage in Small Business,” MIS Quarterly (12:1), 1988, pp. 51-61.
17. Fazio, R. H., and Zanna, M. P. “Direct Experience and Attitude Behavior Consistency,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (14), L. Berkowitz (ed.), New York: Academic Press, 1981, pp. 161-202.
18. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. “Acceptance, Yielding, and Impact: Cognitive Processes in Persuasion,” in Cognitive Responses in Persuasion, R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, and T. C. Brock (eds.), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1981.
19. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 1975.
20. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., and McArdle, J. “Changing the Behavior of Alcoholics: Effects of Persuasive Communication,” in Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, I. Ajzen and M. Fishbein (eds.), Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1980.
21. Fuerst, W., and Cheney, P. “Factors Affecting the Perceived Utilization of Computer-Based Decision Support Systems in the Oil Industry,” Decision Sciences (13:4), 1982, pp. 554-569.
22. Galletta, D. F., Ahuja, M., Hartman, A., Teo, T., and Peace, A. G. “Social Influence and End-User Training,” Communications of the ACM (38:7), 1995, pp. 70-79.
23. Grover, V. “An Empirically Derived Model for the Adoption of Customer-Based Interorganizational Systems,” Decision Sciences (24:3), 1993, pp. 603-640.
24. Hartwick, J., and Barki, H. “Explaining the Role of User Participation in Information System Use,” Management Science, (40:4), 1994, pp. 440-465.
25. Igbraria, M., Guimaraes, T., and Davis, G. B. “Testing the Determinants of Microcomputer Usage via a Structural Equation Model,” Journal of Management Information Systems (11:4), 1995, pp. 87-114.
26. Igbraria, M., Pavri, F., and Huff, S. “Microcomputer Application: An Empirical Look at Usage,” Information & Management (16:4), 1989, pp. 187-196.
27. Igbraria, M., Zinatelli, N., Cragg, P., and Cavaye, A. L. M. “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model,” MIS Quarterly (21:3), 1997, pp. 279-305.
28. Karahanna, E., and Straub, D. “The Psychological Origins of Perceived Usefulness and Perceived Ease of Use,” Information & Management (35:4), 1999, pp. 237-250.
29. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., and Chervany, N. L. “Information Technology Adoption Across Time: A Cross-Sectional Comparison of Pre-Adoption and Post-Adoption Beliefs,” MIS Quarterly (23:2), 1999, pp. 183-213.
30. Kelman, H. C. “Process of Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly (25), 1961, pp. 57-78.
31. King, R. C., and Kugler, J. L. “The Influence of Rhetorical Schemes on Innovation Decisions,” Journal of Information Systems (3), 1993, pp. 255-270.
32. King, R. C., and Xia, W. “Media Appropriateness: Effects of Experience on Communication Media Choice,” Decision Sciences (28:4), 1997, pp. 877-910.
33. Kraemer, L., Danziger, J. N., Dunkle, D.E., and King, J.L. “The Usefulness of Computer-Based Information to Public Managers,” MIS Quarterly (17:2), 1993, pp. 129-148.
34. Kwon, T. H., and Zmud, R. W. “Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation,” in Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, J. R. Boland and R. Hirschheim (eds.), New York: John Wiley, 1987, pp. 227-251.
35. Lee, D. S. “Usage Patterns and Sources of Assistance to Personal Computer Users,” MIS Quarterly (10:4), 1986, pp. 313-325.
36. Leonard-Barton, D. “Implementation Characteristics of Organizational Innovations: Limits and Opportunities for Management Strategies,” Communication Research (15:5), 1988, pp. 603-631.
37. Mathieson, K. “Predicting User Intentions: Comparing the Technology Acceptance Model with the Theory of Planned Behavior,” Information Systems Research (2:3), 1991, pp. 173-191.
38. Melone, N. P. “A Theoretical Assessment of the User-Satisfaction Construct in Information Systems Research,” Management Science (36:1), 1990, pp. 76-91.
39. Moore, G. C., and Benbasat, I. “Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation,” Information Systems Research (2:3), 1991, pp. 192-222.
40. Nelson, R. R. “Individual Adjustment to Information-Driven Technologies: A Critical Review,” MIS Quarterly, (14:1), 1990, pp. 87-98.
41. Nunnally, J. C. Psychometric Theory, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1967.
42. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Dubuque, IA: Wm. C. Brown, 1981.
43. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. “The Effects of Involvement on Responses to Argument Quantity and Quality: Central and Peripheral Routes to Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (46), 1984, pp. 69-81.
44. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T. “Issue-Involvement Can Increase or Decrease Persuasion by Enhancing Message-Relevant Cognitive Responses,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (37), 1979, pp. 1915-1926.
45. Petty, R. E., and Cacioppo, J. T., Goldman, R. “Personal Involvement as a Determinant of Argument-Based Persuasion,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (41), 1981, pp. 847-855.
46. Petty, R. E., Harkins, S. G., Williams, K. D. “The Effects of Group Diffusion of Cognitive Effort on Attitudes. An Information Processing View,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (38), 1980, pp. 81-92.
47. Petty, R. E., and Wegener, D. T. “Attitude Change: Multiple Roles for Persuasion Variables,” in The Handbook of Social Psychology, D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, and G. Lindzey (eds.), New York: McGraw-Hill, 1998, pp. 323-390.
48. Raymond, L. “End-User Computing in the Small Business Context: Foundations and Directions for Research,” Database (20:4), 1990, pp. 20-26.
49. Raymond, L. “The Impact of Computer Training on the Attitudes and Usage Behavior of Small Business Managers,” Journal of Small Business Management (26:3), 1988, pp. 8-13.
50. Rivard, S., and Huff, S. “Factors of Success for End-user Computing,” Communications of the ACM (31:5), 1988, pp. 552-561.
51. Rice, R. E., and Case, D. “Electronic Message Systems in the University: A Decision of Use and Utility,” Journal of Communication, (Winter), 1983, pp. 131-152
52. Rice, R. E., and Rogers, E. M. “Re-Invention in the Innovation Process,” Knowledge, (1), 1980, pp. 499-514.
53. rd ed.), New York: Free Press, 1983.
54. th ed.), New York: Free Press, 1995.
55. Rosenberg, N. Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1982.
56. Schewe, C. D. “The MIS User: An Exploratory Behavioral Analysis,” Academy of Management Journal (19:4), 1976, pp. 577-590.
57. Schmitz, J., and Fulk, J. “Organizational Colleagues, Information Richness and Electronic Mail: A Test of the Social Influence Model of Technology Use,” Communication Research, (18:4), 1991, pp. 487-523.
58. Slusher, M. P., and Anderson, C. A. “Using Causal Persuasive Arguments to Change Beliefs and Teach New Information. The Mediating Role of Explanation Availability and Evaluation bias in the Acceptance of Knowledge,” Journal of Educational Psychology (88), 1996, pp. 110-122.
59. Taylor, S., and Todd, P. A. “Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models,” Information Systems Research (6:2), 1995, pp. 144-176.
60. Thompson, V. A. Bureaucracy and Innovation, Huntsville, AL: University of Alabama Press, 1969.
61. Venkatesh, V. “Creation of Favorable User Perceptions: Exploring the Role of Intrinsic Motivation,” MIS Quarterly, (23:2), 1999, pp. 239-260.
62. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test,” Decision Sciences, (27:3), 1996, pp. 451-481.
63. Venkatesh, V., and Davis, F. D. “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies,” Management Science, (46:2), 2000, pp. 186-204.
64. Walther, J. B., and Burgoon, J. K. “Rational Communication in Computer-Mediated Interaction,” Human Communication Research (19:1), 1992, pp. 50-88.
65. Webster Jr., F. E. “New Product Adoption in Industrial Markets: A Framework for Analysis,” Journal of Marketing (33:3), 1969, pp. 35-39.
66. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., and Biek, M. “Working Knowledge and Attitude Strength: An Information Processing Analysis,” in Attitude Strength: Antecedents and Consequences, R. E. Petty and J. A. Krosnick (eds.), Nahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 1995, pp. 283-313.
67. Wright, J. S., and Warner, D. S. Advertising, New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.