Afocal magnification does not influence chick eye development

Optometry and Vision Science

Volumn 76, Issue 5, 1999, Pages 316-319

  Curry, Tracey A ^a   Sivak, Jacob G ^a   Callender, Murchison G ^a   Irving, Elizabeth L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b TORONTO WESTERN HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Chicks; Defocus induced ametropia; Magnification; Myopia

Indexed keywords

EYE MOVEMENTS; EYEGLASSES; GOGGLES; OPHTHALMOLOGY; OPTICAL INSTRUMENT LENSES;

AFOCAL MAGNIFICATION; DEFOCUS-INDUCED AMETROPIA; MYOPIA;

VISION;

A SCAN; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYE; EYE DEVELOPMENT; MYOPIA; NEWBORN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFRACTION ERROR; RETINA; RETINA IMAGE;

ACCOMMODATION, OCULAR; ANIMALS; ANIMALS, NEWBORN; CHICKENS; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EYE; EYEGLASSES; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTIVE ERRORS;

EID: 0033002171     PISSN: 10405488     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199905000-00020     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Irving EL, Sivak JG, Curry TA, Callender MG. Chick eye optics: zero to fourteen days. J Comp Physiol (A) 1996;179:185-94.
2. Pickett-Seltner RL, Weerheim J, Sivak JG, Pasternak J. Experimentally induced myopia does not affect post-hatching development of the chick lens. Vision Res 1987;27:1779-82.
3. Schaeffel F, Glasser A, Howland HC. Accommodation, refractive error and eye growth in chickens. Vision Res 1988;28:639-57.
4. Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG. Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:364-8.
5. Irving EL, Sivak JG, Callender MG. Refractive plasticity of the developing chick eye. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1992;12:448-56.
6. Irving EL, Callender MG, Sivak JG. Inducing myopia, hyperopia, and astigmatism in chicks. Optom Vis Sci 1991;68:364-8.
7. McBrien NA, Norton TT. The development of experimental myopia and ocular component dimensions in monocularly lid-sutured tree shrews (Tupaia belangeri). Vision Res 1992;32:843-52.
8. Halass S. Aniseikonia - a survey of the literature. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom 1966;43:505-24.
9. Lakshminarayanan V, Bailey JE, Enoch JM. Optics of phakic, pseudophakic, and aphakic eyes: effects on the Stiles-Crawford (SCE I) function. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:404-8.
10. Jalie M. The Principles of Ophthalmic Lenses. 4th ed. Aylesbury Bucks, Great Britain: Hazell, Watson & Viney Ltd, 1984:469-80.
11. Schmid KL, Strang NC, Wildsoet CF. Imposed retinal image size changes - do they provide a cue to the sign of lens-induced defocus in chick? Optom Vis Sci 1999;76:320-5.
12. Schaeffel F, Howland HC. Properties of the feedback loops controlling eye growth and refractive state in the chicken. Vision Res 1991; 31:717-34.
13. Wildsoet CF, Howland HC, Falconer S, Dick K. Chromatic aberration and accommodation: their role in emmetropization in the chick. Vision Res 1993;33:1593-603.
14. Schwahn HN, Schaeffel F. Chick eyes under cycloplegia compensate for spectacle lenses despite six-hydroxy dopamine treatment. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1994;35:3516-24.
15. Bartmann M, Schaeffel F. What are the features in the retinal image that are used to control axial eye growth? In: Elsner N, Heisenberg M, eds. Genes, Brain and Behavior, Goettingen Neurobiology Conference. Stuttgart: Thieme, 1993:452.