Quantification of extracranial ICA stenoses with vessel ultrasound by CCDS and B-flow in comparison to 64-slice multidector CTA, contrast-enhanced MRA and DSA;Quantifizierung von extrakraniellen A. carotis interna (ACI) stenosen mittels gefäßultraschall mit FKDS und B-flow im vergleich zur 64-zeilen-multidetektor-CTA, der MRA und DSA

Ultraschall in der Medizin

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 294-301

  Finkenzeller, Thomas ^a   Tacke, J ^b   Clevert, D A ^c   Jung, W ^d   Kubale, R ^e   Schreyer, A ^a   Feuerbach, S ^a   Jung, E M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL REGENSBURG   (Germany)

^b Klinikum Passau   (Germany)

^c LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^d SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e Institut für Röntgendiagnostik Sonographie und MR   (Germany)

Author keywords

Angiography; Carotid arteries; CT angiography; MR angiography; Ultrasound

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTRAVASCULAR ULTRASOUND; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; RELIABILITY; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; CONTRAST MEDIA; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 45949109468     PISSN: 01724614     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1027473     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Arning C, Hammer E, Kortmann H et al. Quantifying stenosis of the internal carotid artery: which ultrasound criteria are relevant? Ultraschall in Med 2003; 24: 233-238
2. Gaitini D, Soudack M. Diagnosing carotid stenosis by Doppler sonography: state of the art. J Ultrasound Med 2005; 24: 1127-1136
3. Neff KW, Kilian AK, Meairs S et al. Correlation of duplex sonographic stenosis grading by means of cross-sectional analysis and MR-tomographic blood volume flow quantification in unilateral stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 992-999
4. Arning C. Perivascular tissue vibrations: a criterium for high-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery. Ultraschall in Med 2001; 22: 62-65
5. Sabeti S, Schillinger M, Mlekusch W et al. Quantification of internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex US: comparative analysis of different flow velocity criteria. Radiology 2004; 232: 431-439
6. Hwang CS, Liao KM, Lee JH et al. Measurement of carotid stenosis: comparisons between duplex and different angiographic grading methods. J Neuroimaging 2003; 13: 133-139
7. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL et al. Carotid artery stenosis: grayscale and Doppler ultrasound diagnosis - Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound consensus conference. Ultrasound Q 2003; 19: 190-198 Review
8. Horrow MM, Stassi J, Schurman A et al. The limitations of carotid sonography: interpretive and technology-related errors. Am J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 189-194
9. Jung EM, Kubale K, Clevert DA et al. B-flow and contrast medium-enhanced power Doppler (Optison®) -preoperative diagnosis of high-grade stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 62-69
10. Jung EM, Kubale K, Clevert DA et al. B-flow and B-flow with 3D and SRI postprocessing before intervention and monitoring after stenting of the internal carotid artery. Clinical Hemorheology and Microcirculation 2007; 36: 35-46
11. Jung EM, Kubale K, Clevert DA et al. B-flow and color-coded B-flow in sonographic diagnosis of filiform stenosis of the internal carotid artery. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1251-1258
12. Jung EM, Kubale R, Ritter G et al. Diagnostics and characterisations of preocclusive stenosis and occlusions of the internal carotid artery with B-flow. European Radiology 2007; 17: 439-447
13. Wessels T, Harrer JU, Stetter S et al. Three-dimensional assessment of extracranial Doppler sonography in carotid artery stenosis compared with digital subtraction angiography. Stroke 2004; 35: 1847-1851
14. Harada K, Nakahara I, Tanaka M et al. Comparison of the findings of multislice CT and angiography after stenting for supraaortic arteries. No Shinkei Geka 2004; 32: 29-35
15. Lell M, Anders K, Leidecker C et al. CTA of carotid artery with different scanner types. Radiologe 2004; 44: 967-974
16. Straube T, Wolf S, Flesser A et al. MRT bei Karotisstents: Einfluss von Stenteigenschaften und Geräteparametern auf die Darstellung des Karotislumens. (MRI of carotid stents; influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen). Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 375-380
17. Aschenbach R, Eger C, Basche S et al. Grading of carotid artery stenosis using high resolution dynamic magnetic resonance angiography in comparison to intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. Are stenoses over 70% reliably detectable? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 357-362
18. Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Collie DA et al. Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis - effect of observer experience. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 126-132
19. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445-452
20. Kubale R, Arning C. Stellenwert der Doppler-sosgraphischen Verfahren zur Diagnose der Karotisstenose. Radiologe 2004; 44: 946-959
21. Bosiers M, Peeters P, Deloorse K et al. Does carotid artery stenting work on the long run: 5-year results in high-volume centers (ELOCAS Registry). J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino) 2005; 46: 241-247
22. Bibl D, Lampl C, Biberhofer I et al. Internal carotid artery stent placement without emboli protection: results and long-term outcome. Neurology 2005; 65: 132-134
23. Vitek JJ, Al-Mubarak N, Iyer SS et al. Carotid artery stent placement with distal balloon protection: technical considerations. JNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005; 26: 854-861
24. MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trail (ACST) Collaborative Group. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endaterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 363: 1491-1502
25. Halliday A, Mansfield A, Marro J MRC Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trail (ACST) Collaborative Group.. Prevention of disabling and fatal strokes by successful carotid endarterectomy in patients without recent neurological symptoms: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004; 364: 416
26. Clevert DA, Rupp N, Reiser M et al. Improved diagnosis of vascular dissection by ultrasound B-flow: a comparison with color-coded Doppler and power Doppler sonography. Eur Radiol 2005; 15: 342-347
27. Bartlett ES, Walters TD, Symons SP et al. Diagnosing carotid stenosis near-occlusing by using CT angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 2006; 27: 632-637
28. Clevert DA, Johnson T, Michaely H. High-grade stenoses of the internal carotid artery: comparison of high-resolution contrast enhanced 3D MRA, duplex sonography and power Doppler imaging. Eur J Radiol 2006; 60: 379-386
29. Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Collie DA et al. Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis - effect of observer experience. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 868-869
30. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Castellano R et al. Carotid Artery Stenosis: Intraindividual Correlations of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography, Contrast-enhanced MR Angiography, Conventional DSA, and Rotational Angiography for Detection and Grading. Radiology 2005; 236: 204-213
31. Clevert DA, Johnson T, Jung EM et al. Color Doppler, power Doppler and B-flow ultrasound in the assessment of ICA stenosis: Comparison with 64-MD-CT angiography. Eur Radiol 2006; online first