MRI of carotid stents: Influence of stent properties and sequence parameters on visualization of the carotid artery lumen;MRT bei karotisstents: Einfluss von stenteigenschaften und geräteparametern auf die darstellbarkeit des karotislumens

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 177, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 375-380

  Straube, Torsten ^a   Wolf, S ^a   Flesser, A ^c   Deli, M ^b   Alfke, K ^a   Nabavi, A ^a   Jansen, O ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^b Entwicklungs /Forschungsztr M   (Germany)

^c Dendron/MTI   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carotid stents; CE MRA; Flip angle; Stent geometry

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; MEDILOY; NITINOL; SILICON; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CAROTID ARTERY; CAROTID ARTERY FLOW; CAROTID ARTERY STENT; CONTRAST ENHANCED MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; FLIP ANGLE; GEOMETRY; GRADIENT ECHO SEQUENCE; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETISM; MATERIAL COATING; MATERIALS; MODEL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUMP; RADIATION SHIELD; RADIOFREQUENCY; STENT; STENT LUMEN; STENT STRUT; TECHNICAL AID; TECHNIQUE; TUBE; TURBO SPIN ECHO SEQUENCE;

ALLOYS; ARTIFACTS; CAROTID ARTERIES; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MODELS, ANATOMIC; STENTS;

EID: 14944356452     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-813878     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. New PF, Rosen BR, Brady TJ et al. Potential hazards and artifacts of ferromagnetic and nonferromagnetic surgical and dental materials and devices in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology 1983; 147 (1): 139-148
2. Buchli R, Boesiger P, Meier D. Heating effects of metallic implants by MRI examinations. Magn Reson Med 1988; 7 (3): 255-261
3. Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Nonsusceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995; 5 (1): 75-88
4. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996; 23 (6): 815-850
5. Teitelbaum GP, Bradley WG Jr, Klein BD. MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stents, and coils. Radiology 1988; 166 (3): 657-664
6. Laissy JP, Grand C, Matos C et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of intravascular endoprostheses: investigation of three devices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1995; 18 (6): 360-366
7. Olree M, Bakker CJ, van Leeuwen MS et al. MRI of endovascular stents: in vitro analysis of imaging artifacts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1997; 20 (S1): 60-65
8. Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Debatin JF. Plain and covered stent-grafts: in vitro evaluation of characteristics of three- dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 211 (3): 693-697
9. Matsumoto AH, Teitelbaum GP, Carvlin MJ et al. Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging of vascular stents. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990; 14 (3): 357-361
10. Schürmann K, Vorwerk D, Bücker A et al. Magnetic resonance angiography of nonferromagnetic iliac artery stents and stent-grafts: A comparative study in sheep. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 1999; 22 (5): 394-402
11. Amano Y, Ishihara M, Hayashi H et al. Metallic artifacts of coronary and iliac arteries stents in MR angiography and contrast-enhanced CT. Clin Imaging 1999; 23 (2): 85-89
12. Bartels LW, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RF artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2002; 47 (1): 171-180
13. Meyer JM, Buecker A, Spuentrup E et al. Improved in-stent magnetic resonance angiography with high flip angle excitation. Invest Radiol 2001; 36 (11): 677-681
14. Bakker CJ, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA et al. Simulation of susceptibility artifacts in 2D and 3D Fourier transform spin-echo and gradient-echo magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1994; 12 (5): 767-774
15. Graf H, Klemm T, Lauer U et al. Systematik der Artefakte metallischer Gefäßprothesen (Stents) in der MRT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 1711-1719
16. Bartels LW, Smits HF, Bakker CJ et al. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. J Vase Interv Radiol 2001; 12 (3): 365-371
17. Tello R, Thomson KR, Witte D et al. Dynamic gadolinium DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance of intravascular stents. Invest Radiol 1998; 33: 411-414