Grading of Carotid Artery Stenosis Using High Resolution Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Angiography in Comparison to Intraarterial Digital Subtraction Angiography. Are Stenoses over 70% Reliably Detectable?;Graduierung von Karotisstenosen Mittels Hochaüfgelöster Dynamischer MR-Angiographie im Vergleich zur Intraarteriellen DSA. Können Stenosen über 70% Zuverlässig Erkannt Werden?

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 176, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 357-362

  Aschenbach, R ^a   Eger, C ^a   Basche, S ^a   Vogl, T J ^b  

^a HELIOS KLINIKUM ERFURT   (Germany)

^b GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Carotid artery stenosis; Dynamic magnetic resonance angiography; Intraarterial digital subtraction angiography

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; IOPROMIDE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CAROTID ARTERY OBSTRUCTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ECHOGRAPHY; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VALIDATION PROCESS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; CAROTID STENOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 1642340288     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2004-812894     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Oberholzer K, Kreitner KF, Kalden P et al. Kontrastverstärkte dreidimensionale MR-Angiographie der A. carotis bei 1.0 Tesla im Vergleich zur i. a. DAS - ist die Methode für die Diagnostik von Karotisstenosen geeignet? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 350-355
2. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trail Collaboratores. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high grade carotid artery stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445-453
3. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Arterosclerosis for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. J Am Med Ass 1995; 273: 1432-1228
4. European Carotid Surgery Trialist's Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337: 1235-1243
5. Horrow MM, Stassi J, Schurman A et al. The Limitations of carotid sonography: interpretative and technology-related errors. Amer J Roentgenol 2000; 174: 189-194
6. Polak JF, Dobkin GR, O'Leary DH et al. Internal carotid artery stenosis: accuracy and reproducibility of colour-Doppler assisted duplex imaging. Radiology 1989; 173: 793-798
7. Heisermann JE, Dean BL, Hodak JA. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. Am J Neuroradiol 1994; 15: 1401-1408
8. The Asymptomatic Carotid Arterosclerosis Study Group. Study design for randomised prospective trial of carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic Arterosclerosis. Stroke 1989; 20: 844-848
9. Lell M, Wildberger JE, Heuschild M et al. CT-Angiographie der A. carotis: Erste Erfahrungen mit einem 16-Schicht-Spiral-CT. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 1165-1169
10. Heiland S, Hartmann M, Sartor K. MR-Angiographie: Technische Grundlagen und Anwendungen in der Diagnostik neurologischer Erkrankungen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 677-685
11. Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Debatin JF. MR-Angiographie: Erste Wahl bei Abklärung des arteriellen Gefäßsystems. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 551-561
12. Friese S, Krapf H, Fetter M et al. Kontrastangehobene MR-Angiographie (CEMRA): Verbessern Kontrastmittel mit höherer T1-Relaxivität die Darstellung von Karotisstenosen? Fortschr Röntgenstr 2001; 173: 542-546
13. Krappel FA, Bauer E, Harland U. Kann die Time-of-flight-Angiographie in der MRT die präoperative Duplex- und Doppler-Untersuchung der Arteria carotis ersetzen? Ergebnisse eines prospektiven Vergleichs mit Literaturübersicht. Z Orthop 2002; 140: 435-439
14. Gottschalk S, Gaebel C, Haendler G et al. Kontrastmittelunterstü tzte 3D-MR-Angiographie (CEMRA) bei intrakraniellen Stenosen und Aneurysmen. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 704-713
15. Huston J 3rd, Fain SB, Riederer SJ et al. Carotid arteries: Maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. Radiology 1999; 211: 265-273
16. Shinji N, Tokiko K, Hiroshi F et al. Contrast enhanced MR angiography of the carotid artery using 3D-Time-resolved imaging of contrast kinetics (3D-TRICKS): Comparison with real-time fluoroscopic triggered 3D-elliptic centric view ordering. Radiation Medicine 2001; 19 (4): 185-192
17. Wilman AH, Riederer SJ, Huston J3rd et al. Arterial phase carotid and vertebral artery imaging in 3D contrast enhanced MR angiography by combining fluoroscopic triggering with an elliptic centric acquisition order. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40: 24-35
18. Golay X, Brown SJ, Itoh R et al. Time-resolved contrast enhanced carotid MR angiography using sensitivity enconding (SENSE). AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001; 22: 1615-1619
19. Sodickson DK, Manning MJ. SMASH imaging. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 1999; 7: 237-254
20. Morasch MD, Gurjala AN, Washington E et al. Cross-sectional magnetic resonance angiography is accurate in predicting degree of carotid stenosis. Ann Vasc Surg 2002; 18 (2): 890-896
21. Wutke R, Lang W, Fellner C et al. High-resolution contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography with elliptic centric k-space ordering of supraaortic vessels compared with selective x-ray angiography. Stroke 2002; 33 (6): 1522-1529
22. Wikström J, Johansson LO, Rossitti S et al. High resolution carotid artery MRA. Comparison with fast dynamic acquisition and duplex ultrasound scanning. Acta Radiologica 2002; 43: 256-261
23. Sundgren PC, Sunden P, Lindgren A et al. Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 592-599
24. Shigeki A, Hiroto N, Hiroshi K et al. Dynamic contrast enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of carotid artery: High resolution sequences in different acquisition planes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000; 21: 381-385
25. Wardlaw JM, Lewis SC, Collie DA et al. Interobserver variability of magnetic resonance angiography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis; effect of observer experience. Neuroradiology 2002; 44: 126-132
26. Derdeyn CP, Powers WJ, Moran CJ et al. Role of Doppler ultrasound in screening for carotid artherosclerosis. Radiology 1995; 197: 635-643
27. Johnson MB, Wilkinson ID, Wattam J et al. Comparison of Doppler ultrasound, magnetic resonance angiographic techniques and catheter angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Clinical Radiology 2000; 55: 912-920
28. Long A, Lepoutre A, Corbillon E et al. Critical review of non- or minimally invasive methods (Duplex Ultrasonography, MR- and CT-angiography) for evaluating stenosis of the proximal internal carotid artery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002; 24: 43-52
29. Jung EM, Kubale R, Clevert DA et al. B-Flow und kontrastmittelverstä rkte Power Mode mit Optison® - Präoperative Diagnostik der hochgradigen Stenose der A. carotis interna. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2002; 174: 62-69
30. Gabelmann A, Krämer SC, Rieber A et al. Vergleich zweier Gadolinium-Chelate (Gd-DTPA und Gd-BOPTA) in der 3D-MR-Angiographie der Karotiden: Erste klinische Ergebnisse. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2000; 172: 111
31. Goyen M, Herborn CU, Vogt FM et al. Using a 1M Gd-chelate (gadobrutol) for total-body three-dimensional MR angiography: Preliminary experience. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17 (5): 565-571