Computer-assisted implantology: Historical background and potential outcomes - A review

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 95-104

  Azari, Abbas ^a   Nikzad, Sakineh ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Computer assisted implantology; Dental implants; Prosthodonticdriven implantology

Indexed keywords

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

COMPUTER ASSISTED; COMPUTER-ASSISTED IMPLANTOLOGY; CT-SCAN; DATA-SOURCE; HISTORICAL BACKGROUND; IMPLANTOLOGY; INHERENT COMPLEXITY; POTENTIAL OUTCOMES; PROSTHODONTICDRIVEN IMPLANTOLOGY;

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;

ACCURACY; BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING; COMPUTER ASSISTED IMPLANTOLOGY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DRILL; ERROR; IMPLANT; INTERNET; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PROSTHESIS; PUBLICATION; RADIATION EXPOSURE; REVIEW; ROBOTICS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT PLANNING;

EID: 45949085744     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.188     Document Type: Review

References (120)

1. Kopp KC, Koslow AH, Abdo OS. Predictable implant placement with a diagnostic/surgical template and advanced radiographic imaging. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 89: 611-615.
2. Duff RE, Razzoog ME. Management of a partially edentulous patient with malpositioned implants, using all-ceramic abutments and all-ceramic restorations: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent 2006; 96: 309-312.
3. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, et al. Bending overload and implant fracture: retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10: 326-334.
4. Hobkirk JA, Havthoulas TK. The influence of mandibular deformation, implant numbers, and loading position on detected forces in abutments supporting fixed implant superstructures. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 169-174.
5. Stanford CM. Biomechanical and functional behavior of implants. Adv Dent Res 1999; 13: 88.
6. Becker CM, Kaiser DA. Surgical guide for dental implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 248-251.
7. Almog DM, Torrado E, Meitner SW. Fabrication of imaging and surgical guides for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 504-508.
8. Almog DM, Torrado E, Meitner SW. Fabrication of imaging and surgical guides for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 504-508.
9. Garber DA. The esthetic dental implant: letting restoration be the guide. J Oral Implantol 1996; 22: 45-50.
10. Pesun IJ, Gardner FM. Fabrication of a guide for radiographic evaluation and surgical placement of implants. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 548-552.
11. Lal K, White GS, Morea DN, et al. Use of stereolithographic templates for surgical and prosthodontic implant planning and placement. Part I. The concept. J Prosthodont 2006; 15: 51-58.
12. Widmann G, Bale JR. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 305-313.
13. Wat PY, Chow TW, Luk HW, et al. Precision surgical template for implant placement: a new systematic approach. Clin Implant Dent Relat 2002; 4(2): 88-92.
14. Basten CH. The use of radio-opaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 609-612.
15. Çehreli MC, Asian Y, Sahin S. Bilaminar dual-purpose stent for placement of dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 84: 55-58.
16. Koyanagi K. Development and clinical application of a surgical guide for optimal implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 88: 548-552.
17. Shahrasbi AH, Hansen AC. Surgical oral radiographic guide with a removable component for implant placement. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 330-332.
18. Jacobs R. Preoperative radiologic planning of implants in compromised patients. Periodontology 2003; 33: 12-25.
19. Reiskin AB. Implant imaging. Dent Clin North Am 1998; 42: 47-56.
20. BouSerhal C, Jacobs R, Quirynen M, et al. Imaging technique selection for the preoperative planning of oral implants: a review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2002; 4: 156-172.
21. Hounsfield GN. Computerized transverse axial scanning (tomography) I. Description of system. Br J Radiol 1973; 46: 1016-1022.
22. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML, et al. Computed tomography. Part I. Preoperative assessment of the mandible for endosseous implants surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 137-141.
23. Schwarz MS, Rothman SLG, Rhodes ML, et al. Computed tomography. Part II. Preoperative assessment of the maxilla for endosseous implants surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1987; 2: 143-148.
24. Vannier MW, Marsh JL, Warren JO. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction images for craniofacial surgical planning and evaluation. Radiology 1984; 150: 179-184.
25. Ericson S, Kurol J. CT diagnosis of ectopically erupting maxillary canines - a case report. Eur J Orthodont 1988; 10(2): 115-121.
26. Helms CA, Katzberg RW, Moorish R, et al. Computed tomography of the temporomandibular joint meniscus. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1983; 41(8): 512-517.
27. Larheim TA, Kolbenstvedt A. High resolution computed tomography of the osseous temporomandibular joint: some normal and abnormal appearances. Acta Radiol 1984; 25: 465-469.
28. Cohen H, Ross S, Gordon R. Computerized tomography as a guide in the diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disease. JADA 1985; 110: 57-60.
29. de Bont LGM, van der Kuijl B, Stegenga B, et al. Computed tomography in differential diagnosis of temporomandibular joint disorders. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1993; 22: 200-209.
30. Jemt T. Implant treatment in resorbed edentulous upper jaws. A 3-year follow-up study in 70 patients. Clin Oral Implants Res 1993; 4: 187-194.
31. Misch CE. Density of bone: effect of treatment planning, surgical approach, and healing. In Contemporary Implant Dentistry, Misch CE (ed.). Mosby Year-Book: St. Louis, MO, 1993; 469-485.
32. Bahat O. Treatment planning, placement of implants in the posteriormaxillae: report of 732 consecutive Nobelpharma implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Impl 1993; 8: 151-161.
33. Bassi F, Procchio M, Fava C, et al. Bone density in human dentate and edentulous mandibles using computed tomography. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999; 10: 356-361.
34. Ulm C, Kneissel M, Schedle A, et al. Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous maxilla. Clin Oral Impl Res 1999; 10: 459-476.
35. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Bränemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontal 1991; 62: 2-4.
36. Jemt T, Book K, Linden B, et al. Failures and complications in 92 consecutively inserted overdentures supported by Bränemark implants in severely resorbed edentulous maxillae: a study from prosthetic treatment to first annual check-up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992; 7: 162-167.
37. Engquist B, Bergendal T, Kallis T, et al. A retrospective multicenter evaluation of osseointegrated implant supporting overdentures. Int J Oral Maxillofacial Implants 1988; 3: 129-134.
38. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. EAO guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13: 566-570.
39. Sonic M, Abrahams J, Faiella R. A comparison of the accuracy of periapical, panoramic and computerized tomographic radiographs in locating the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994; 9: 455-460.
40. Todd AD, Gher ME, Quintero G, et al. Interpretation of linear and computed tomograms in the assessment of implant recipient sites. J Periodontal 1993; 64: 1243-1249.
41. Klinge B, Peterson A, Maly P. Location of the mandibular canal: comparison of macroscopic findings, conventional radiography and computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1989; 4: 327-332.
42. Rosenfeld A, Mecall JA. The use of interactive computed tomography can predict the esthetic and functional demands of implant-supported prostheses. Compendium 1996; 17(12).
43. Lekholm U, Zarb GA. Patient selection and preparation. In Tissue Integrated Prostheses: Osseointegration in Clinical Dentistry, Bränemark PI, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T (eds). Quintessence: Chicago, 1985; 199-209.
44. Friberg B, Jemt T, Lekholm U. Early failures in 4641 consecutively placed Brånemark dental implants: a study from stage I surgery to the connection of completed prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991; 6: 142-146.
45. Jaffin RA, Berman CL. The excessive loss of Brånemark fixtures in type IV bone: a 5-year analysis. J Periodontal 1991; 62: 2-4.
46. Ekfeldt A, Christiansson U, Eriksson T, et al. A retrospective analysis of factors associated with multiple implant failures in maxillae. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 462-467.
47. Ekestubbe A, Thilander A, Groendahl K, et al. Absorbed doses from computed tomography for dental implant surgery: comparison with conventional tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1993; 22: 13-17.
48. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Efective dose and risk assessment from film tomography used for dental implant diagnostics. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1994; 23: 123-127.
49. Frederiksen NL, Benson BW, Sokolowski TW. Efective dose and risk assessment from computed tomography of the maxillofacial complex. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1995; 24: 55-58.
50. Stefanou EP, Donta-Bakoyianni C, Hourdakis D, et al. Radiation absorbed dose from linear tomography and CT scan of the maxillofacial complex [abstr]. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998; 27(suppl 1): 51.
51. Dula K, Mini R, van der Stelt PF, et al. Hypothetical mortality risk associated with spiral computed tomography of the maxilla and mandible. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104: 503-510.
52. Tyndall AA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2000; 89: 630-637.
53. White SC, Heslop EW, Hollender LG, et al. Parameters of radiologic care: an official report of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2001; 91: 498-511.
54. Harris D, Buser D, Dula K, et al. European Association for Osseointegration (EAO) guidelines for the use of diagnostic imaging in implant dentistry. A consensus workshop organized by the European Association for Osseointegration in Trinity College Dublin. Clin Oral Implant Res 2002; 13: 566-570.
55. KalenderWA, Siessler W, Klotz E, et al. Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. Radiology 1990; 173: 567-568.
56. Berland LL, Smith JK. Multidetector-array CT: once again, technology creates new opportunities. Radiology 1998; 209: 327-329.
57. Webber RL. Self-calibrated tomosynthetic, radiographic-imaging system, method and device. US Patent No. 5 359 637, 1994.
58. Mozzo P, Procacci C, Tacconi A, et al. A new volumetric CT machine for dental imaging based on the cone-beam technique: preliminary results. Eur Radiol 1998; 8(9): 1558-1564.
59. Dawson P. Patient dose in multislice CT: why is it increasing and does it matter? Br J Radiol 2004; 77: S10-13.
60. Amet EM, Ganz SD. Implant treatment planning using a patient acceptance prosthesis, radiographic record base, and surgical template. Part 1: presurgical phase. Implant Dent 1997; 6: 193.
61. Verde MA, Morgano SM. A dual-purpose stent for the implant supported prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69: 276.
62. Israelson H, Plemons JM, Watkins P, et al. Barium-coated surgical stents and computer-assisted tomography in the preoperative assessment of dental implant patients. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1992; 12: 52.
63. Klein M, Cranin AN, Sirakian A. A computerized tomographic (CT) scan appliance for optimal presurgical and preprosthetic planning of the implant patient. Prac Periodont Aesthet Dent 1993; 5: 33.
64. Mariano JE, Arenal AA, Ceballos AP, et al. Fabrication on an implant radiological-surgical stent for the partially edentulous patient. Quint Int 1995; 26: 111.
65. Basten CH. The use of radio-opaque templates for predictable implant placement. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 609.
66. Borrow W, Smith Justin P. Stent marker materials for computerized tomograph-assisted implant planning. Int J Periodont Rest Dent 1996; 16: 61.
67. Basten CH, Kois JC. The use of barium sulfate for implant templates. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 76: 451.
68. Rosenfeld AA, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Int J Periodont Restor Dent 2006; 26: 215-221.
69. Gillespie JE, Isherwood I. Three-dimensional anatomical images from computed tomographic scans. Br J Radiol 1986; 59: 289-292.
70. Jacobs R, Adriansens A, Naert I, et al. Predictability of reformatted computed tomography for pre-operative planning of endosseous implants. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1999; 28: 37-41.
71. Kraut RA. Utilization of 3D/dental software for precise implant site selection: clinical reports. Implant Dent 1992; 1: 134-139.
72. Ganz SD. CT scan technology: an evolving tool for avoiding complications and achieving predictable implant placement and restoration. Int Mag Oral Implantol 2001; 1: 6-13.
73. Levin R. A High-Tech Investment for a More Profitable Practice. CSI Levin Booklet. CSI Company, Columbia, Maryland 21045, 1998.
74. Verstreken K, Van Cleynenbreugel J, Marchal G, et al. Computer-assisted planning of oral implant surgery: a three-dimensional approach. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996; 11(6): 806-810.
75. Verstreken K, Cleynenbreugel JV, Martens K, et al. An image-guided planning system for endosseous oral implants. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998; 17(5): 842-852.
76. Golec TS. CAD-CAM multiplanar diagnostic imaging for subperiosteal implants. Dent Clin North Am 1986; 30(1): 85-95.
77. Truitt HP, James RA, Lindley PE, et al. Morphologic replication of the mandible using computerized tomography for the fabrication of a subperiosteal implant. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 65(5): 499-504.
78. Petzold R, Zeilhofer HF, Kalender WA. Rapid prototyping technology in medicine - basics and applications. Comput Med Imag Graph 1999; 23: 277-284.
79. Potamianos P, Amis AA, Forester AJ, et al. Rapid prototyping for orthopaedic surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 1998; 212(5): 383-393.
80. Liu Q, Leu MC, Schmitt SM. Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application. Int J Adv ManufTechnol 2006; 29: 317-335.
81. Lightman AJ. Medical applications. In JTEC/WTEC Panel Report on Rapid Prototyping in Europe and Japan, vol I, Analytical Chapters. Rapid Prototyping Association of the Society of Manufacturing Engineers: Dearborn, MI, 1997; 12: 129.
82. Jacobs PF. Rapid Prototyping and Manufacturing: Fundamentals of Stereolithography. Society of Manufacturing Engineers: Dearborn, MI, 1992.
83. Cooper KG. Rapid Prototyping Technology: Selection and Application. Marcel Dekker: New York, 2001.
84. D'Urso PS, et al. Custom cranioplasty using stereolithography and acrylic. Br J Plast Surg 2000; 53: 200-204.
85. Gateno J, Allen ME, Teichgraeber JF, et al. An in vitro study of the accuracy of a new protocol for planning distraction osteogenesis of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2000; 58: 985-990.
86. Potamianos P, Amis AA, Forester AJ, et al. Rapid prototyping for orthopaedic surgery. Proc Inst Mech Eng H J Eng Med 1998; 212(5): 383-393.
87. Klein HM, Schneider W, Alzen G, et al. Pediatric craniofacial surgery: comparison of milling and stereolithography for 3D model manufacturing. Pediatr Radiol 1992; 22(6): 458-460.
88. James WJ, Slabbekoorn MA, Edgin WA, et al. Correction of congenital malar hypoplasia using stereolithography for presurgical planning. J Oral Maxillofacial Surg 1998; 56: 512-517.
89. Barker TM, Earwaker WJS, Frost N, et al. Integration of 3D medical imaging and rapid prototyping to create stereolithographic models. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 1993; 16(2): 79-85.
90. Swann S. Integration of MRI and stereolithography to build medical models: a case study. Rapid Prototyp J 1996; 2(4): 41-46.
91. McGurkM, Potamianos P, Amis AA, et al. Rapid prototyping techniques for anatomical modelling in medicine. Ann Royal College Surgeons Engl 1997; 79: 169-174.
92. European Commission. BRITE-EURAM: Making a Lasting Impression on Europe. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Brussels, 2002.
93. Wouters K. What is the PHIDIAS Network? Phidias Newsletter 1998; 1.
94. EU Projekt PISA/BRPR970378 Project (No. BE96-3456) (1999) http://www.lft.unierlangen.de/SEITEN/PROJEKT_AB/ INNOPRO/PROJEKTE/Europa.html [accessed 16 October 2006].
95. Mankovich NJ, Cheeseman AM, Stoker NG. The display of three-dimensional anatomy with stereolithographic models. J Digit Imag 1990; 3: 200.
96. Tardieu PB, Vrielinck L, Escolano E. Computer-assisted implant placement. A case report: treatment of the mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2003; 18: 599-604.
97. Porada S, Millner PA, Chiverton N, et al. Computer aided surgery with lumbar vertebral drilling guides, using computer-aided planning, design and visualization. In Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, RRRU, Schol of Medicine, University of Leeds, 2001; 165.
98. Cuppone M, Seedhom BB, Berry E. Design of drill guides for the thoracic and cervical regions of the spine. In Proceedings of Medical Image Understanding and Analysis, 28-30 Clarendon Road, Leeds LS29NZ, England, 2001; 129.
99. Watzinger W, Birkfellner F, Wanschitz F , et al. Computer-aided positioning of dental implants using an optical tracking system - case report and presentation of a new method. J Craniomaxfac Surg 1999; 17(2): 77-81.
100. Almog DM, Benson BW, Wolfgang L, et al. Computerized tomography-based imaging and surgical guidance in oral implantology. J Oral Implantol 2006; 32(1): 14.
101. Fuller CD, Scarbrough TJ. Fiducial markers in image-guided radiotherapy of the prostate. US Oncolog Dis 2006; 75-78.
102. Brief J, Hassfeld S, Sonnenfeldb U, et al. Computer-guided Insertion of Dental Implants-A Clinical Evaluation. CAR 2003, 2001; 739-747.
103. Roberts DW, Strohbehn JW, Hatch JF, et al. A frameless stereotaxic integration of computerized tomographic imaging and the operating microscope. J Neurosurg 1986; 65: 545-549.
104. Satava RM. Emerging technologies for surgery in the 21st century. Arch Surg 1999; 134: 1197-1202.
105. Casap N, Tarazi E, Wexler A, et al. Intraoperative computerized navigation for flapless implant surgery and immediate loading in the edentulous mandible. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2005; 20: 92-98.
106. Dunkley P. Virtual reality in medical training. Lancet 1994; 343: 1218.
107. Wagner A, Ploder O, Enislidis G, et al. Image-guided surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1996; 25: 147-151.
108. Ewers R, Schicho K, Undt G, et al. Basic research and 12 years of clinical experience in computer assisted navigation technology: a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005; 34: 1-8.
109. Materialise. Internal booklet. Simplant CMF Photo Mapping Tutorial. Leuven, Belgium, 2006.
110. Birkfellner W, Huber K, Larson A, et al. A modular software system for computer-aided surgery and its first application in oral implantology. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2000; 19: 616-620.
111. Robotics medical imaging and dental implantology. Centre Du Robotics: http://caor.ensmp.fr/french/recherche/rim/Encadre ImplantologieRobotisee.php [accessed 6 November 2007].
112. Agency of the Economie of the Ministry of Finance and the Industry; Secretaryship of State to the Industry [in French]. 1998; http://www.cgm.org/ themes/deveco/formati/rap-tic. html [accessed 6 November 2007].
113. Dutreuil J, Goulette F, Laurgeau C. Computer-assisted dental implantology: a new method and a clinical validation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI) 2001, Niessen W, Viergever M (eds). Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS) 2208. Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2001; 384-391.
114. Neugebauer J, Karapetian VE, Schuler M, et al. Fabrication of surgical template for CT-based implant planning. Int Poster J Dent Oral Med 2004; 6(4): Poster No. 248.
115. Kielhorn J, Schnellbächer K. Treatment planning and immediate restorations: a team approach challenge. ZahnTechnique Magazine 2005; 9(4): 178-192.
116. Tal H, Schicho KA, Shohat M. Implant locating and placement based on a novel tactile imaging and registration concept: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007; 22: 1007-1011.
117. Solar P, Grampp S, Gsellmann B. A computer-aided navigation system for oral implant surgery using 3D-CT reconstruction and real time video-projection. In Computer Assisted radiology. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Computer and Communication Systems for Image Guided Diagnosis and Therapy, June 1996, Paris, France, Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al. (eds). Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1996; 884-887.
118. Brief J, Hassfeld S, Redlich T, et al. Robot-assisted insertion of dental implants - a clinical evaluation. In Lemke HU, Vannier MW, Inamura K, et al. (eds). Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress and Exhibition, 28 June-1 July 2000, San Francisco, CA. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2000; 932-937.
119. Widmann G, Bale R. Accuracy in computer-aided implant surgery-a review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006; 21: 305-313.
120. Wanschitz F, Birkfellner W, Watzinger F, et al. Evaluation of accuracy of computer-aided intraoperative positioning of endosseous oral implants in the edentulous mandible. Clin Oral Impl Res 2002; 13: 59-64.